Zachary C.

f***, i be’d instead of becomed again

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@RadishHarmers thank god

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@lilyf4g @spankeye @L1ly0fth3v4l3y i think Butler goes into this in “Bodies That Matter”, fabulous wonderful book imo

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spankeye @lilyf4g @L1ly0fth3v4l3y ty

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spankeye @lilyf4g @L1ly0fth3v4l3y which literature are you talking about? only familiar with Hooks and Butler but this seems wrong on bith counts. are they not radical?

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@rabidoventare @spce33 @boreddeleuzian it doesnt feel like you read philosophy of language at all… who specifically do you read lol?

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@Tallulah_66_XX @boreddeleuzian something that would allow you to say freakish things like what u said? does that cover it?

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spce33 @boreddeleuzian gotta be real saying “xxx has nothing to do with linguistics” is a kinda naieve flop in modern philosophy my guy

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spce33 @boreddeleuzian “sex has nothing to do with linguistics” ok haha see this is just indefensible. everything in the world of words has something to do with linguistics, if u cannot talk about it then it is hard to say it exists (again, recommending Lacan)

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@rabidoventare @spce33 @boreddeleuzian also, philosophy of language and no Butler? so u don’t like structural linguistics? de Saussure? Lacan? much of her work is at least around structural linguistics purview imo haha

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spce33 @boreddeleuzian @rabidoventare “have u ever had a thought that you hadnt read in a book yet” ok sure close enough to a gr8 question. hear me out —- Jacques Lacan — great stuff u may be interested. ideas later developed upon by many including Butler which is funnnn

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@rabidoventare @spce33 @boreddeleuzian im not sure i understand, is there a typo in the second sentence?

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@rabidoventare @boreddeleuzian @spce33 i read a lot. she seems gr8 to me. wut r u reading?

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spce33 @boreddeleuzian @rabidoventare u talk about these things like catechisms to obey; Foucault’s “the order of things” can help show u how that field is constructed as well. not “wrong” per se, but very obviously constructed. must warn u, this was a much harder book for me, but very rewarding as well

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@rabidoventare @spce33 @boreddeleuzian yeah i still dont think that is true at all haha, have u read her? what serious stuff is more comprehensible to you? for a baseline. who is an eminently comprehensible writer in the field of gender or sexuality studies to you?

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@Tallulah_66_XX @boreddeleuzian “safeguarding children against trans ideology” — gotta be real it kinda seems like they should be safeguarded against your ideology freak

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@boreddeleuzian @spce33 @rabidoventare its starting to feel like they don’t want to read or learn at all 😱

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@rabidoventare @spce33 @boreddeleuzian ill be honest… she is not that hard to read haha. one of the easiest i have found. have u actually tried or r u just sayin stuff lol

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spce33 @boreddeleuzian no i dont think a persons sex is easily proven? i think the book i talked about goes deeply into that.

i think the question u asked only makes sense if u assume sex is easily proven, which again i do not

[Zachary C. @zachcwc]

@spce33 @boreddeleuzian i am saying that “objective reality of sex is easily proven” seems wrong? i am getting this notion from the book i mentioned. i gave a simple version of why in the tldr but if u want to read more i recommend that book.