"To design is to make decisions for others. Because it involves an exchange of power, however slight, design is best understood as a moral pursuit."
Free download: https://t.co/lOeu9ysiWC
It's telling how many designers are content to "change the world," with no moral or political specificity, no regard for unintended consequences, wrapped in a warm blanket of privileged optimism.
@HeartSocialMdia @blk_amanda I can locate no better place for navigating morality in a free society than institutions. I'm open (and frankly, sort of eager) to being shown a better way of thinking about it, if there is one. It's not enough just to tear it down. That's why I think the conversation matters!
@HeartSocialMdia @blk_amanda I think I understand what you're saying. At root, the question is whether we should use rhetoric and reason to undermine and replace lousy insitutions (an Enlightenment idea) or find a framework other than "institutions" for pursuing moral design.
@HeartSocialMdia @blk_amanda Oh, it's absolutely not on her. She offered to do some research for our #moraldesign conversation, and I'm grateful for her contribution. Thank you for clarifying.
@blk_amanda Even so, I'll hold the molotov cocktail while you light it. But we should probably have a blueprint for what we want to rebuild in the ashes. If not morals, markets and mediating institutions, then what? Excited to see what you find!
@blk_amanda Thank you for posting this. Important to hold historical contexts carefully. Plenty of good and bad in Enlightenment thinking. But it's misguided to suggest that white supremacy and/or colonialism find their primary footing in thinkers like Smith. He was/is used by all sides.
Just sat in a room full of strangers at #edUiconf and talked vulnerably and honestly about #moraldesign. It was amazing! Learned a ton. Thankful for all who participated and for the opportunity. It was a conversation I'll return to often.
I'm hopeful.