Ozymandias

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@spyderrmann What did he do in winning the euros in 2016? Crappiest euros win ever. 3rd placed finish and only beat Wales in 90 mins. And didn't even feature for most of the final.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@UtdMaI What did Ronaldo even contribute to his Euro win. Crappiest major tournament win in history. Qualifies for knockouts with a best placed 3rd finish and only beat Wales in 90 mins.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@chigozi89964847 @gyaigyimii This is so wet

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@Tepelbos @visegrad24 Where does the Quran allow for this?

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs I am mistaken on this particular example. You mentioned rock where strictness can be applied. I stand corrected here, barakallahu feek

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs Stupidity. Shirk too but only if they ascribe divinity.

The criterion for shirk has been strict for Ahlus Sunnah (at least until the 18th century)

You can't take single ayahs in isolation without considering the totality of what the mushriks did and what they admitted to doing.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs Then we are in agreement alhamdulillah

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs https://t.co/txtcOaxVUp

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs Then what do you make of Allah commanding the angels to make sujud to Adam. Would you not categorise sujud as an act reserved only for Allah? So did Allah command the angels to commit shirk? Or does this not count as shirk? If it doesn't, then the intent is the driver.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs Circular reasoning. You define du'a as worship, then cite mushrikeen making du'a as proof of that definition. This isn't classical Islam. It's an 18th century Najdi view.

The Qur'an says they worshipped - calling upon idols was one form of that worship, not what made it worship.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs You're supposing as Ibn Abdul Wahab wrongly did that actions alone determine shirk. This is false. What made it worship was their belief and so too their admission that it is an act of uboodiyah as the Quran mentions.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs 39:3 is stating they explicitly worshipped. Muslims don't worship the dead. Intent dictates what the form is in its essence. Otherwise the extreme act of sujood is always shirk but it isn't necessarily unless coupled with intention, take Yusuf's brothers and the angels to Adam.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@loves_coding @SalafisLs You're reducing it to the action void of intention. That's an absurdity. They believed the idols had divine agency.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@othmaanX @cookingtrolls @Adam80494145 @mohammed_hijab @Leafywashere00 My convinced opinion actually is that we cannot say with any certainty it's any particular age. Rather it shouldn't be frowned upon to have a spectrum of opinion on her age just like there is with the age of Khadija Ra.

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@abdul_now It is protected by demonstrating that honest examination conducted with proper methodology either holds under pressure or self-corrects with integrity. A barrier that cannot survive contact with the tradition's own tools is not intellectual authority. It is enforced credulity. /5

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@abdul_now Al-Daraqutni flagged chains he considered defective. This is not revisionism, it is the tradition's own self-correcting mechanism functioning as intended.
The authority of the Sahihayn is not protected by insulating specific narrations from scrutiny. /4

[Ozymandias @zcaboah]

@othmaanX @cookingtrolls @Adam80494145 @mohammed_hijab @Leafywashere00 Yes, at least read it and then you can comment on it beyond "Claude"