Cyrus

Focuz

[me irl @me_when_irl]

"You're sentenced to work 9 to 5 with 2 weeks vacation a year for the rest of your life"

[Cassandra Unchained @michaeljburry]

July 2026 Charity of the Month
Seva Foundation
Transforming Lives by Restoring Eyesight

https://t.co/NSESsJ45cv

https://t.co/la5slhlLo9

[Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 @mtgreenee]

This is the most horrific thing happening in our lifetimes and America is complicit and does nothing to stop it.

Even worse, we fund it.

[The Greek Trader @TheGreekTrader]

The Final Review for the market "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31" is pretty much OVER.

13.60M UMA tokens have been revealed voting NO, enough for consensus to be achieved.

This means that once the Reveal Phase ends, the market will resolve to NO in ~14–18 hours.

At this point, the voting is effectively over and the outcome can't be changed.

Don't listen to CT KOLs who know nothing about Polymarket and are telling you to buy YES.

[Polymarket Money @PolymarketMoney]

$MSTR sold 32 Bitcoin for ~$2.5M last week.

[Domer❤️‍🔥 @Domahhhh]

I do agree it was a scam. Although I think it's wrong to blame it solely on Polymarket (even tho they're def also to blame).

UMA/UMA Rocks/hidden precedents/clarifications on vibes....It's a totally, totally broken system where scams are now a regular occurrence. It is comically broken at this point. And it's not funny at all when you're the victim.

The point of a prediction market is predicting what will happen.

Anyone who predicted Yes was correct.

Expiring it to No, which is a total lie, is a joke. It overturns the whole point of betting on the future.

[PMTraderAdam @PMTraderAdam]

I feel for willo2

This never should have been allowed to happen

These fringe rule cases are really hurting the future for prediction markets

[MEXC Predict @MEXC_Predict]

Regarding the prediction event “Will MicroStrategy sell any Bitcoin by ___?”, MEXC acknowledges that users on both the YES and NO sides have different views regarding the final outcome.

After carefully reviewing user feedback and conducting further internal assessment, MEXC has decided to apply a user-friendly resolution to this disputed event by treating both YES and NO positions as settled at 1.

Specifically, YES positions will be settled directly at 1, while users holding NO positions will receive equivalent compensation as if their NO positions were also settled at 1.

At MEXC, we believe fairness matters. We are willing to take additional responsibility to reflect our respect for community feedback, our commitment to handling disputed outcomes fairly, and our long-term goal of building a more transparent and user-friendly Prediction Market platform.

MicroStrategy report: https://t.co/8aaFHcgOpd
MEXC Prediction Market: https://t.co/grz8nGJzCa

#MEXC #MEXCPredict #Bitcoin

[₿itcoin ₿eliever @BTCBeliever21]

🟠 ''MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?''

🏅 I became a top ~0.07% all-time trader ranked #1126 on @Polymarket with this trade, but there is an issue.

The outcome is a clear ✅ YES. But they ruled ❌ NO.

📄 @Strategy clearly states in the 8-K filing with the SEC that they sold 32 BTC in the month of May, 2026:

🪙 ''On June 1, 2026, Strategy announced updates with respect to its bitcoin holdings: 32 BTC sold''

📅 ''During Period May 26, 2026 to May 31, 2026''

🆕 The news was all over @X. Strategy sold 32 BTC! They sold last week, in May. There is no way around it.

👨‍🏫The rules on this Polymarket event are clear:

📃 ''This market will resolve to "Yes" if MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by 11:59 PM ET on the date specified in the title. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".''

📃 ''The primary resolution source for this market will be information from MSTR and on-chain data, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.''

💹 The market rules point to when Strategy SOLD.

📢 Not to when Strategy ANNOUNCED the sale.

❌ Polymarket cancelled the outcome in contradiction to their own rules. The team made an executive decision on this. They resolved a clear YES, into a shocking NO.

🏆 I was the #1 holder of this market until the dispute. I also was the initial disputer of the NO outcome.

🔎 I ask for @Polymarket to seriously investigate this.

And could I maybe get my $750 dispute bond back? 😅

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

@ProfessorCornel @Polymarket Polymarket added this "Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."

It's insane because clearly the market was open while the 8K was issued.

There was no reason to think the 8K would be disqualified, but Polymarket decided not to recognise it.

[Coin Bureau @coinbureau]

🚨 IS THIS POLYMARKET'S MOST CONTENTIOUS RESOLUTION EVER?

On June 1, Strategy officially disclosed it had sold 32 BTC between May 26–31, its first Bitcoin sale in over three years.

Traders immediately piled into 'YES' shares on Polymarket's "Will Strategy sell Bitcoin before May 31?" market, sending them above 80¢ as the outcome appeared all but confirmed.

However, the outcome was later steered toward "NO" after Polymarket added a late clarification stating that confirmation of the sale had to occur within the market's timeframe- a condition that was not part of the original rules.

The controversy deepened when the market remained unresolved even after Strategy's 8-K disclosed the sale, with traders claiming large UMA holders accumulated significant 'NO' positions while the dispute remained open.

One trader, BTCBeliever21, says he accumulated 200,000 YES shares for roughly $15,000 and watched the position peak above $150,000 before the market resolved against him.

He is joined by all 'YES' holders who argue the that the contract asked whether Strategy will sell Bitcoin before May 31 and not whether the sale will be publicly disclosed before May 31.

[VIKTOR @thedefivillain]

$20 BILLION BUSINESS BTW

The resolution of this market is honestly a joke. It's clearly supposed to settled on 'YES'.

You can see the difference between the rules of the "weekly BTC purchases" markets, where it was clearly written that the market will resolve based on announcements, and the currently disputed market where it was NOT written.

[₿itcoin ₿eliever @BTCBeliever21]

There is a similar market on @Polymarket.

Here they also issued an incorrect clarification.

But then still chose to resolve the market to YES.

Exactly the same situation regarding Strategy Inc. sale within the window, and a later 8-K announcement.

https://t.co/zz7qrAjwDY

[Cyrus @zcrynow]

@willo2_Poly @Domahhhh @shayne_coplan @0xMerp @mdudas @fozzydiablo @0xMerp @lukecannon727 @llamaonthebrink @econoar @HugoMartingale @williamlegate @Polymarket @devjoshstevens

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

I was just scammed for $500K by Polymarket.

I am "willo2", the top holder of YES on "MicroStrategy sells Bitcoin by May 31st".

Here's what happened:

[Science girl @sciencegirl]

The distinctive features of a Tibetan fox

[RT @RT_com]

Brazil is going viral with ‘running raves’

Sao Paulo’s PACETRONIK events mix group runs with electronic music and club energy

The running rave concept is already backed by ASICS Brasil

Footage: PACETRONIK

[Tomket Lovers Community @TomketLovers]

Kita tuh gampang banget kebawa bahas akhir zaman.

Timeline kiamat, teori ini itu, Dajjal, perang besar, matahari terbit dari barat.

Seru sih. Deg-degan juga.
Tapi kadang gue mikir…

Kenapa kita lebih semangat nebak kapan dunia selesai,
daripada beresin hidup sendiri?
Kita takut sama cerita kiamat,
tapi masih santai ninggalin sholat.

Kita merinding denger soal hisab,
tapi dosa harian dianggap “ah nanti aja tobatnya.”
Kayak… prioritasnya kebalik nggak sih?

Padahal yang paling realistis itu bukan nunggu tanda besar muncul.
Yang realistis itu: umur kita nggak ada yang tahu.

Kiamat dunia mungkin masih lama.
Tapi “kiamat versi kita” bisa kapan aja.

Dan nggak ada notifikasi.
Nggak ada countdown.
Nggak ada trailer dulu.

Gue juga lagi belajar. Bukan paling bener.

Cuma pengingat bareng aja.
Mungkin yang perlu kita takutin bukan kapan dunia hancur,
tapi kalau ternyata kita dipanggil dalam keadaan belum siap.

Pelan-pelan beresin diri.
Pelan-pelan benerin yang bisa dibenerin.

Karena jujur aja…
kita nggak tahu besok masih dikasih kesempatan atau nggak.
Semoga kita nggak cuma jago bahas akhir zaman

[Milk Road Macro @MilkRoadMacro]

Warren Buffett used to read 5 to 6 hours every single day.

5 daily newspapers. Magazines. 10Ks. Annual reports.

He had been doing this for over 70 years.

Most people want Buffett's returns without Buffett's reading habits.

That's not how it works.

"I just read and read and read."

No system. No shortcut. No AI summary.

Just hours of sitting with information, thinking about it, and letting it compound in your head the same way money compounds in a portfolio.

The edge isn't the reading. It's what 70 years of reading does to your pattern recognition.

He still reads slower than he did when he was young. He still does it anyway. Most people quit reading the moment they leave school. Buffett never stopped.

That gap sustained over decades is the entire explanation for why he sees things other people miss.