al-'Araf above forbidding udhr bil jahl in shirk. The Mushrikīn(which includes the Prophet parents) from Ahl al-Fatrah would be in hell. There's no imtihān for them.
As ibn Taymiyyah said: فإن أقوال العلماء يحتج لها بالأدلة الشرعية لا يحتج بها على الأدلة الشرعية
'al-Allamah ash-Shinqitī made istidlāl from the ayah وما كنا معذبين حتى نبعث رسولا which is clearly talking about the 'adhab of the dunyah according to ash-Shawkānī and the hadith of imtihān of Ahl al-fatrah which is clearly da'īf according to ibn Abd al-Barr. There's Hisham...
Shaikh Muhammad Al-Amīn As-Shinqity (rahimahuLlah) made a very beautiful and convincing argument that the Prophet's parents are among the people of fatrah.
And Qatadah who's a mudalis in the isnād(he never said hadathanī). Ash-Shinqitī believed there's precedence for qat'ī(nass from the Qur'an) over akhbār ahad(singular hadith) if there's i'tirāḍ. There's no i'tirād in this case because there's ayat al-mithaq already in surat..
Majority of these people are sūfis, but they think they're better than others. Because they pray 5 times in a day, without understanding the religion itself. Majority have zero knowledge on aqeedah(tawhīd). You guys are delusional.
When I first moved to Europe, I had the mentality that only Arabs practiced islam better than Northern Arewa people. One day, I accompanied my friend to see a native Dutch Muslimah he wanted to marry. She reverted a couple of years ago and to my surprise, she was in full hijab head to toe, you could barely see even her fingers and her Mahram was present. When I expressed shock, he told me they never meet without her Mahram and though he has her number, they never had private conversations without the presence of her Mahram. They communicated only through a watsaap group where her Mahram was present. I was shocked to see native Dutch practicing islam with much principle, discipline & passion than many of us the so called “born muslims”.
It's funny most of the people on this list are those who made jarh on Abū Hanīfah. Ḥammād bn Salamah said Abū Hanifah was a māriq(kāfir), al-Awza'ī gave thanks to Allāh when Abū Hanīfah died. These āthār are there in kitab us-sunnah li Abdullah bn Imam Ahmad.
Ibn Taymiyyah's defense of Imam Abu Hanifa.
“Whoever declares Abū Ḥanīfah, or those like him from the Imams of Islam, to be a disbeliever is himself more deserving of takfīr. For the Imams of Islam whom the Muslims agreed upon as being rightly guided and knowledgeable, and who have a truthful reputation in the Ummah — such as Mālik, al-Thawrī, al-Layth b. Saʿd, al-Awzāʿī, Abū Ḥanīfah, al-Shāfiʿī, Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, Isḥāq b. Rāhwayh, Abū ʿUbayd, and their likes — whoever declares them disbelievers has opposed the consensus of the Ummah and departed from its religion.”
[Ibn Taymiyyah, Jāmiʿ al-Masāʾil, vol. 7, pp. 337–338]
“Just as Abū Ḥanīfah — even though people disagreed with him on some matters and objected to him regarding them — no one doubts his fiqh, understanding, and knowledge. And things were transmitted from him intending to make him look bad, but they are definitely lies against him, such as the issue of the wild pig and similar matters.”
Ibn Taymiyyah, Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, 2/619–620.
Narrating from innovators is a matter of ikhtilaf and needs tafsīl, people like Ibn Abass, Imam Mālik and from the mu'asirin like Sh. Rabee' don't accept the riwayāt of Ahl al-bid'ah muṭlaqan. Whether the person bid'ah is bid'at al-mukafirah/mufasiqah. Especially the da'ees+
There’s a diff between narrating from innovators & seeking ilm from them. The muhaditheen used to narrate from the khawarij bc they were known to be reliable [in this respect] as they believed lying was kufr. This isnt proof that we can sit with ahl ul bid’ah & learn from them.
This is wrong and not from the sunnah, you've taken them away from the mercy/guidance of Allāh while they're still alive. La'na is 'ummūm for the people of bid'ah not on 'ayn(that's still alive). You can takfīr/tabdī' them.
This is a lie Abū Hanīfah was a person of ra'ī that's why he do reject the ahadith of the Prophet.
"If the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, had met me and I had met him, he would have adopted much of what I said. And what is religion but sound judgment?"
Ebu Hanife'nin bazı meselelerde zayıf hadisi bırakıp kıyasa yönelmesi, o hadisin uydurma veya zayıf olduğunu düşünmesinden ya da kendi usulünce sahih görmemesindendir. Müctehid isabet ederse iki, hata ederse bir sevap alır.
İbn Teymiyye, Mecmuu’l-Fetava, Cilt 20, s. 304-306
@jado375 Whether you deem it to be better or the same. According to him tahakum Ila taghut is still kufr. These are his statements in his matn not the sharh.
Seeking Judgement to other than the Shari'ah is kufr Akbar according to Sh. Muhammad bn Ibrāhīm in his matn of risālah tahkīm al-qawānīn. Whether it's due to juhud or not. You guys are trying to remove actions from īmān(manhaj of the murji’ah). There's no darurah in kufr!!!
Willingly seeking Judgement from the tawaghīt is kufr Akbar, Unless there's ikrah(coercion).
The question to you people is how would someone know whether there's juhud in the mind of the person seeking Judgements from the tawaghīt?!
Everyone is claiming Salafis these days, but ask them of their opinion on al-intikhabat al-taghutiyah in a democratic system and the hukm of democracy itself. This exposes their reality and deceits. They're never Salafis but Salafī-wannabes(on the manhaj of Sururis/ikhwanis)
Hating the kuffar for Allāh's sake is from the uṣul of your dīn which is al-walā’ wal barā’. We're not talking about the washed fashion of Islam you've been sold. Islam isn't liberalism. If you think the kuffar/mushrikīn are your friends you need to go learn your dīn.
The asl of the ayah ومن لم يحكم بما أنزل الله فأولئك هم الكافرون is kufr Duna kufr(minor kufr) as explained by ibn Abass. But those who’ve made istihlāl/istibdal of the Shari’ah to democracy/man-made laws makes the ayah kufr Akbar. Because the Jews in the hadīth didn't...
Ruling by man-made laws that’re opposed to the Shari’ah is kufr Akbar not kufr Duna kufr as clear in the hadīth of Barā' bn ‘Azib. Because they've made the istihlāl of the hukm that's known already and has hadd in the Shari’ah. It's only kufr Duna kufr if it's done due to...
Ruling by man-made laws that’re opposed to the Shari’ah is kufr Akbar not kufr Duna kufr as clear in the hadīth of Barā' bn ‘Azib. Because they've made the istihlāl of the hukm that's known already and has hadd in the Shari’ah. It's only kufr Duna kufr if it's done due to...