@lockin_500@Elanit@subiime@padspoker 😂 true
but if its streamed u have at least do check. it makes no sense that you could have the answer to the most important question and not seek it
The primary purpose of a rule is to ensure you can be as fair as possible, wouldn't you agree?
Without stream you cant see which card would be discarded so you shuffle again. Fair.
Whats your priority here, is not to be fair? If its possible to see it in the cameras, why not use them? Because of the delay on the stream? Whats the priority here?
@TrackingTheEdge@tombos21 Poker sites are not interested in rewards pure skill, they just care to maximize their profits, and it comes from having more players playing the highest rake game possible, and this only happens when you have degenerated gamblers playing and u increase the rake
@OMaciel1903 “O aumento da dívida, em relação ao que havia sido orçado, tem relação com a amortização dos ativos (rescisões, por exemplo).”
Eu gosto dos teus posts, mas tu sabe o q significa isso? É uma questão de mudança de fluxo, apenas
@tombos21 Lol i love your questions xD
1) yeah, u can exploit it
2) i think yes if its always the same pattern and u can find out quickly. If it makes like: 50% of the times aggro low and 50% aggro high it would mix again and u wouldnt find a pattern and then unexploitable xD
@Joeingram1@GTOWizard but this shows that the fact that its pot limit makes the game somewhat limited, right? a node where you just call the range has no strategic complexity whatsoever :( but at least PLO has much less range betting than texas…
Our player Pedro Toledo “biluzin” was one of the players unfairly banned by WPN last year when they decided not to pay the promised rakeback, claiming that he, Fred “Nizza” Nizzatto, and Danilo “UrsoBranco” Jientara had engaged in softplay (all playing 200,000 hands of 200 blitz per month) or bring thr same person (????) in a pool with less than 100% rakeback (?????), which was around 65%. Now that Pedro has won the Coin Poker CGWC playing against the best in the world, will the site commit to reviewing the error? @WPN_CEO@ACRPokerBR@AcrPokerLatam
2p2 thread is here: https://t.co/IiZV8z44CU
here btn blinds works way better than sb and bb, and squid makes people play waay wider. But idk, each markt is very different 😓 i just dont think things that are in theory way more incentivized to play but that doesnt is easy to catch easily for weak players like antes or no blinds would make people play more. I think they would basically ignore it. When u make a huge penalty like squid, then you have action
I played a lot of 5% uncapped games in brazil, (even with mississipi straddle in majority of the cases) 8-9-10max where u have to play like 8% ep rfi or limp only sb and bb.. everyone (even “regs”) was playing 15-20% or more like if there was no rake or low cap on it 🤣 squid or minimum vpip in some manner would be the best for action in a recs-weak regs environment imo.. just good (online) regs can adapt or understand how aggressive rake and blinds structure affects your strategy in general.. in my experience live regs/regfishes are totally cluelesss about it…
So, it really depends on the ecosystem you're in. I don't know what the rake is like for the biggest streams in the US and Triton, for example, which has a large market for sponsors. Here in Brazil, we ran two seasons of High Limit Poker Brazil, of which I am the CEO, and I can guarantee you that: a) without rake or with a rake team, the numbers don't add up (which is terrible because that would be my ideal world). b) recreational players here have no idea about the changes in strategy according to the rake, and few regs care.