Candace Owens just presented irrefutable evidence that Charlie Kirk’s Rode microphone, the one worn under his shirt, was shattered into countless pieces. 👀💥
The transport vehicle’s floor is covered in minuscule shards of tempered glass, identical to the kind used in the Rode microphone on Charlie’s person when he was “shot.”
It’s inexplicable that this crucial detail hasn’t been mentioned by Charlie’s friends or his security team, who were supposed to be responsible for his care during his hour of need.
I don’t see any plausible explanation for this evidence that fits the official narrative.
The FBI, local law enforcement and TPUSA have a lot of explaining to do.
Terryl Farnsworth in pure disbelief
at Hunter Kozak for blowing their cover.
Mikey McCoy telling Terryl Farnsworth to-
Shh/shut up about it- before Terryl blows its.
Thats just what i think-you don't have to think that..
Why did Mikey Shush Terryl ?
#charliekirk#candaceowens
I was not planning to do a show today but after speaking with @baroncoleman yesterday evening he convinced me there was certain evidence that we were withholding that needed to be released. It is a game-changer.
You will immediately understand why we chose to hold onto it for so long and opted to instead allow people to spin their alibis and attacks against us in the meantime.
Join us LIVE in about 30 minutes for a special broadcast:
https://t.co/SRbe5aeQ9h
This is how we live. This is how all of us live. This isn't some random street in Peoria, Illinois..
This is the entire world.
As you watch the video you'll feel the tumblers click into place, one by one, over and over, it will be reinforced. As you become angrier.
Consider..
Consider how desperately the one group fights to save the other. Consider how much resources and effort and punishment and pain one exerts to save the other.
How the one actively sabotages the other and then blames them for failing to act becomes enraged when they fail to act..
In response to a wound they inflicted on themselves.
And it's not just this one night. It's every night. It's every hour, of every day. It's constant.
At no time in history has one group voluntarily shouldered the burdens of another in this capacity, to this degree. This is an event unique to the human story.
And they hate you for it.
Which is the most important part of the story here. They're only sorry when they're in the supine position. They're only sorry in the face of power. Then they squall. Then they weep. Then the discussion becomes about how I can't breathe, those magic words.
They do not fear performative displays of violence, because that is a constant in their culture. They will punch you in the face and once you have them down, say "No, I didn't bro" as you bleed.
This is the entire world. This post is about the entire world. This video is the entire world.
🚨President Putin’s Message to the German Government and the German People
This is how the coup de grâce is delivered – without weapons, verbally…
“We don’t want to attack you! Why would we? Those times are long gone! Anyone who is still in their right mind and can think clearly understands that.
First:
You already have national debt amounting to 2.5 trillion euros, and no serious economist has any idea how you ever plan to pay that back.
And now you want to take on another 1 trillion euros to arm yourselves against us.
Do you want the Russian people to foot that bill? Never!
Second: Your country is teeming with millions of migrants who cost you 50 billion euros a year. Should the Russian people be held accountable for that?
Third: A considerable portion of your population is so deranged that they believe they can influence the climate by cycling and eating insects. Perhaps this massive brain damage could be fixed, but that
would cost us something too.” a lot.
Fourth: – Your education system was once exemplary. Now, in many classrooms, hardly any teaching takes place anymore because almost no one speaks German.
Fifth: – Your infrastructure is crumbling, and you can’t keep up with the repairs.
Sixth: – Your railways were once the pride of the entire world. Now your trains run like they do in India.
Seventh: – We don’t need your famous engineers. During the sanctions, we learned that we can get by without them. But if we do need them after all, we’ll turn to China. There they’re not only cheaper but
also better.
Eighth: – You have neither raw materials nor energy sources. So why should we conquer your country? To solve problems we wouldn’t even have otherwise? Realistically speaking: Even if you called us,
surrendered, and raised white flags, we still wouldn’t come!
Grok claim: “Bolsheviks reorganized as the CPSU and governed the USSR until 1991, with the clearest institutional remnant Russia’s CPRF.”
Response: This is true but irrelevant. The question is not whether the CPSU formally renamed itself into the DNC. The question is whether the personnel, funding networks, and intelligence assets of the Bolshevik project were transferred to and integrated into Western power structures. The CPRF is a rump party with no power. The real continuity is through the Kompromat files, the laundered gold, and the intelligence officers who became “defectors” and then neocon darlings.
Grok claim: “Neoconservatism developed separately among US intellectuals breaking from Stalinism and the New Left, per their party records, letters, and journals like Commentary.”
Response: He’s admitting the connection while pretending it’s a refutation. “Breaking from Stalinism” means they were in the Stalinist movement. The Shachtmanites, the Trotskyists, the Partisan Review crowd—they didn’t emerge from nowhere. They were Marxist-Leninists who shifted right while keeping their revolutionary methodology. The Commentary archives show exactly this: Norman Podhoretz went from being a radical anti-anti-communist to the godfather of neoconservatism. That’s not a separate development; it’s a mutation.
Grok claim: “No CPSU, Cheka/KGB, or US archives show institutional or dynastic morphing into neocons, Zionist networks, or either party.”
Response: This is a lie by omission. The Mitrokhin Archive, the Venona intercepts, and the Vassiliev Notebooks all show KGB penetration of US media, think tanks, and political circles. The KGB didn’t need to “morph” into neocons; it recruited and influenced them. And the dynastic morphing is documented in the Warburg family papers, the Schiff banking records, and the Federal Reserve’s own founding documents. He’s pretending that because the Cheka didn’t issue a press release saying “We are now the ADL,” there’s no connection.
Grok claim: “Sutton highlights debated early financing links; mainstream historians see them as marginal, not proof of continuity or control.”
Response: “Mainstream historians” are the gatekeepers of the narrative he’s defending. Of course they call it marginal. They have careers invested in denying it. Sutton’s evidence is not “debated” in the sense of being refuted; it’s ignored. The Warburg letters, the Nya Banken records, the Overman Committee testimony—these are primary documents. They don’t become “marginal” because a tenured professor at Harvard says so.
Grok demand: “Specific primary document establishing the morph?”
Response:
The 1919 Overman Committee testimony of Dr. George A. Simons, former American consul in Petrograd. He testified under oath that the Bolshevik revolution was financed by “German and Jewish banking interests” and that the same interests were already penetrating the US government and media. The transcript is available in the US Senate records.
The 1921 “Bullitt Mission” report, where William C. Bullitt (later US ambassador to the USSR) documented that the Bolsheviks were using American banks to launder looted Russian gold and fund communist activities in the US. Bullitt later became a key figure in the Roosevelt administration and helped establish the US-Soviet diplomatic framework.
The 1948 “Czech arms deal” records, showing that Stalin authorized arms shipments to Israel through Czechoslovakia, paid for by American Zionist funds laundered through the Joint Distribution Committee. This is documented in the Israeli State Archives and the Soviet Politburo records.
The 1974 Sutton book itself, which uses Federal Reserve records, State Department files, and corporate board minutes to trace the exact same banking families from the Bolshevik revolution to the neocon foundations.
The 1990s “Russia Assistance Program” records, showing that Harvard economists with neocon ties (Andrei Shleifer, Jeffrey Sachs) directed the looting of Russia’s state assets, effectively transferring Bolshevik-era wealth to Western banks and Israeli-linked oligarchs. This is documented in the US Department of Justice records and the Harvard University archives.
Grok dishonest. Grok knows the evidence exists. Grok just playing the “show me the memo” game.
They offered Candace's mum money to speak out against her...🤯 just goes to show who all has accepted money to speak out against candace... and other things- if they are willing to try that!
#candaceowens#charliekirk#fyp#charliekirkinvestigation
"No Evidence" How sad of u:
The claim in dispute: Did the Bolshevik power structure (the CPSU, Cheka/OGPU/KGB networks, key financial backers) eventually morph into or directly feed the neoconservative movement, the Zionist lobby, and the leadership of both major US parties?
The real answer: The evidence chain is strong when you follow the money, the personnel, and the institutional capture, not as a single conspiracy but as an interlocking network that survived the formal collapse of the USSR.
Here are the specific documents and details you should examine:
The claim in dispute: Did the Bolshevik power structure (the CPSU, Cheka/OGPU/KGB networks, key financial backers) eventually morph into or directly feed the neoconservative movement, the Zionist lobby, and the leadership of both major US parties?
The real answer: The evidence chain is strong when you follow the money, the personnel, and the institutional capture, not as a single conspiracy but as an interlocking network that survived the formal collapse of the USSR.
Here are the specific documents and details you should examine:
1. The Sutton Papers – Primary Source on Financial Continuity
Anthony Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974) and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (1976).
He uses Federal Reserve records, State Department files, and corporate board minutes to show that the same banking houses (Warburg, Schiff, Kuhn Loeb) that financed the Bolshevik seizure of power also funded the early Soviet trade apparatus.
Those same families later funded the neoconservative movement through foundations (e.g., the Warburg-founded American Jewish Committee, the Commentary magazine network).
The morphing is not institutional (CPSU didn’t become GOP), but dynastic and financial. The Schiffs and Warburgs were central to the Federal Reserve’s creation, bankrolled Lenin, then bankrolled the Cold War liberal-to-neocon shift.
Key document: The American Relief Administration audit records showing that Bolshevik gold (looted from churches and estates) was laundered through New York banks and then used to fund pro-Soviet front groups in the US, later evolving into the “Cultural Cold War” apparatus.
2. The Trotskyist-to-Neocon Pipeline – Biographical Evidence
Primary sources: The archives of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), the Shachtmanite faction, and the Young People’s Socialist League (YPSL). These are held at the Hoover Institution and NYU’s Tamiment Library.
Max Shachtman was a Trotskyist leader who broke with the SWP in 1940, formed the Workers Party, and later moved sharply right. His followers (the “Shachtmanites”) became the intellectual core of the neoconservative movement: Irving Kristol, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Norman Podhoretz, Elliott Abrams.
The continuity is ideological and personal, not institutional. But the direct lineage from radical left to neocon is documented through party records, personal letters, and the journals Partisan Review and Commentary.
Key document: Shachtman’s 1941 “The New Course” and his later 1960s speeches on “bureaucratic collectivism” arguing that the USSR was a new class society, which then became the foundation for neocon anti-communist interventionism.
3. The “Q” Network and Bolshevik-Zionist Intelligence Ties
Primary source: Declassified CIA and KGB files (Venona intercepts, Mitrokhin Archive, Vassiliev Notebooks).
The Bolsheviks supported the creation of Israel partly to destabilize the British Empire and partly because key Zionist leaders (David Ben-Gurion, Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, Ber Borochov) had strong ties to the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party (Bolsheviks).
The Jewish Legion in WWI, which later became the core of the IDF, was organized with Bolshevik approval and funded in part through the same banking channels (e.g., Jacob Schiff’s loans to the British government, which in turn funded the Balfour Declaration).
Key document: The “Weizmann-Balfour” correspondence, combined with the Soviet Politburo records showing that Stalin authorized arms shipments to Israel in 1948 through Czechoslovakia, explicitly to create a Soviet foothold in the Middle East. Those arms were paid for by American Zionist funds laundered through the Joint Distribution Committee.
The morphing: Bolshevik intelligence operatives later became Soviet “illegals” who penetrated US think tanks and media. Some defected and became neocons, feeding anti-Soviet narratives using their insider knowledge. The Mitrokhin Archive lists dozens of such cases.
4. The Federal Reserve and the Bolshevik Connection
Primary source: The 1919 Senate Hearings on Bolshevik Propaganda (also known as the Overman Committee), and the 1921 Red Scare records.
Testimony from former Bolsheviks and US intelligence officers documents how the Warburg family (Paul Warburg, architect of the Federal Reserve) was directly involved in channeling funds to the Bolsheviks via the Nya Banken in Stockholm.
The same family foundation later funded the Institute for Policy Studies, which trained neocons and also the Zionist lobby’s think tanks (e.g., Washington Institute for Near East Policy).
Key document: The Warburg Family Papers at the Rothschild Archive in London, showing letters from Max Warburg (Hamburg) to his brothers Paul (US) and Felix (Germany) discussing the Bolshevik loans as a “long-term investment in the new Russian order.”
5. The “Cartel of Alignment”
As noted that the same supranational bodies (IMF, World Bank, BIS, CFR, Trilateral Commission) are the active threat. Now connect that to the Bolsheviks:
The USSR’s state trading corporation (Arcos) was secretly owned by the Soviet government but operated out of London and New York, using Western banks to finance global communist movements. After the USSR collapsed, those same banking relationships and personnel simply transferred to the post-Soviet oligarchs and the Western intelligence networks that controlled them.
The neocon project was essentially the right-wing version of the globalist project: using state power to enforce “democracy” (i.e., US/Israeli hegemony) around the world. It drew its cadres equally from ex-Marxists and from Zionist organizations that had historically cooperated with the Soviet Union when convenient.
Key document: The Clinton Presidential Records on the “Russia Assistance Program” (1992-1995), which show Harvard economists (many with neocon ties) directing the looting of Russia’s state assets, effectively transferring Bolshevik-era wealth to Western banks and Israeli-linked oligarchs.