@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui You should read the verse that comes before 9:5.
Quran 9:4 explicitly exempts treaty-keeping polytheists/disbelievers, so it very much depends on the target and whatever you have treaties with them.
@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui The majority believes that these verses were not abrogated.
And notably, Ibn Taymiyyah explicitly wrote that the view that 2:190 was not abrogated was the majority scholarly opinion, associated with Malik, Ahmad ibn Hanbal and others.
@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui You’re conflating Umar’s later policies with Khalid’s actions, which the Prophet himself condemned and payed compensation. Qur’an 2:190 prohibits transgression in fighting, while 60:8 commands kindness and justice toward non-Muslims who don’t fight Muslims.
@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui Umar fought the roman empire and the persian empire, the most powerful empires at the time, and they themselves acquired their lands through conquests and controlled lands in Arabia. No one condemns ancient conquests. The ancient world was "conquer or be conquered".
@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui Ibn hisham's works also include inauthentic works. His works, just like Tabari's works, are collections of histotical accounts of varying authenticity.
@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui In simple terms, not everything in Tabari's works is authentic as he was just a compiler of accounts regardless of whatever they are true or not and the story that you are talking about here, as of my knowledge, is not authentic and therefore not true.
@TheWeirdoRed@rewhum@Srhmps @AbdulAguigui You are literally just making things up.
Prophet Muhammad sent khalid to PEACEFULLY preach islam however khalid disobeyed him and when the prophet discovered what he did, he explicitly condemned khalid and ordered Ali to go and pay the effected people compensation.