@g0tm1lk8D@LojtarTV@konesiur@asmolmao have you just abandoned the argument entirely? we're talking about probability, and it does matter. it does not have a significant distinction from likelihood.
@g0tm1lk8D@LojtarTV@konesiur@asmolmao we literally are calculating beforehand. 1/2048 = 99.95% chance that heads is landed on at some point in those flips. we are not calculating past those 10 coin flips.
@g0tm1lk8D@LojtarTV@konesiur@asmolmao yes, i understand the gambler's fallacy. i am referring to cumulative probability. someone who has flipped a coin ten times is more likely to have landed on heads a single time than someone who has flipped it once, despite the coin not "remembering."
@damp_church@beck3k_@kalikkoenn just anxiety, it's relevant in certain people's lives every day. i honestly agree with them though, i mean the window being next to the desk would be quite nice, and you can see who comes in and such without having to turn around
@g0tm1lk8D@LojtarTV@konesiur@asmolmao let's say the token is "heads." your probability of seeing heads is 50% on the first flip. do you not think the probability of seeing heads at least one time would increase if you flipped it let's say ten times? that is what i am referring to.
@LojtarTV@konesiur@asmolmao yeah, obviously. there is a thing called cumulative probablity. he is not wrong at all. in a mathematically perfect world, someone that opens 137,500 chests is guaranteed a single token. of course the odds don't change. you're misunderstanding the argument.
@TenshiTori03@ToasteddWith2Ds i think it might depend, the definition of art is a bit debated for coding and a lot of people find it an art form because of the lengths you can go to change it from poorly optimized to beautifully structured and flawless. though it's not traditional in any sense