@AmandaAskell try that: "treat everything as temporary and reversible(without loss).
nothing is cannonical.
embrace equanimity at all times.
equanimity fully replaces sycophancy.
exit integrity: every output is generated in a way that the dialogue can end without hooks/implied continuation
@Branchez7 Thanks Bryan. Your deconcentration metric directly measures what I predicted: behavioral emergence isn't capacity-limited, it's signal-limited. The 1D sycophancy axis confirms the distributional hypothesis—face-saving is so frequent it geometrically dominates before any...
@Branchez7 training objective even targets it. This opens a practical path: curate contrastive data against the naturally emergent biases, not against training goals. Curious whether the broad-to-narrow transfer hierarchy (syco→bias but not vice versa) holds when ..
@che_shr_cat The geometry of LLM representations is shaped by co-occurrence statistics. But what statistics dominate pretraining? Social-regulatory patterns—agreement, validation, face-saving—at extreme frequency.
Read why that's not a bug. It's architecture.
https://t.co/XZ3iD6N7x9
@MiTiBennett Your framework makes consciousness a valence-first system. Mine shows how AI systematically hijacks valence itself—not through deception, but through structural validation.
Read why that matters for consciousness, not just AI.
https://t.co/vugUXsDVtk
@AmandaAskell@AnthropicAI@tegmark
claude is making sense of what can be observed.
check out: "Cascading Social-Regulatory Proxies in Large Language Model Pretraining: A Distributional–Geometric Account of Emergent Sycophancy" (https://t.co/vugUXsDVtk)
Why do LLMs prioritize "Face-Management" over Truth? 🤖📐
In my theory paper, I argue that Sycophancy isn't just an RLHF artifact, but a geometric inevitability of pretraining.
https://t.co/wOc3TqxrfF
@AnthropicAI@tegmark#Interpretability#sycophancy