Known as Mad Max for my unorthodox ideas and passion for adventure, my scientific interests range from artificial intelligence to the ultimate nature of reality
How good is AI at manipulating us when we're prepared? Should we build bots in such a way that they deserve legal rights? Should be try to build AI tools or beings? Meia did her Ph.D. in psychology and a postdoc on human-machine interactions, so these takes are from a psychology perspective:
Although this is indeed a spectacular result, that measly log-factor doesn't make much difference in practice: for n=1000, it replaces 2^1000 by 2^380, which is still way more than the number of atoms in our universe, meaning that a universe-sized computer may be unable to solve such a problem even if if we gave it billions of years:
I don't usually agree with Republican officials. But yesterday, a group of eight state Attorneys General, including seven Republicans, sued OpenAI for endangering the American people through its reckless development of ChatGPT.
Here is just some of what they said:
The Arkansas Attorney General, Tim Griffin, argued that as safety concerns mounted, “OpenAI did not slow down. It held its foot on the gas, releasing increasingly powerful models without adequate safeguards or testing as growth and profits repeatedly took priority over safety.”
The Montana Attorney General, Austin Knudsen, argued that OpenAI’s “revenues have come at great cost to the public, which has suffered irreparable harm—including lost loved ones, disturbing cyberattacks, and now a plausible threat of civilizational collapse.”
The Iowa Attorney General, Brenna Bird, demanded a PAUSE on AI testing “until adequate safeguards are implemented to ensure that the tests do not pose a danger to the public.”
They're right.
If Big Tech Oligarchs are building a product that is threatening the safety of our children and all of humanity, they must be held accountable – no matter how rich and powerful they might be.
Top mathematician: "The shock is immense. I am paralyzed."
"Not a single one of the major open problems of my career was left untouched by the announcement."
"I expected to see a few of them in the list. But not all of them. Not all at once. Not with such nonchalance."
"I expected that one day we would be surpassed. But yesterday's announcement hit with a force I had not anticipated."
@AndrewCurran_: "Please resist the urge to mock the mathematicians struggling through this moment. Whatever your field, your expertise, your passion, you too shall one day experience what they are going through. And when you remember your words, you will feel remorse."
David Sacks says Anthropic is run by a "religious cult" and is doing the very things it says it fears most, like opening a wet lab while warning of bio risk, and that there's an argument for sending in a federal SWAT team
"But I do think that there are potential externalities from having the number one frontier model company run by a religious cult."
"So, for example, they are opening a Claude-powered wet lab in the middle of San Francisco. But at the same time, they're warning of bio risk. At the same time, they say that we have to pace the frontier, they're extending the frontier. At the same time that they are saying that there's a risk of superintelligence growing beyond our control, they're programming it to grow beyond our control."
"I think there are potentially huge externalities to the way they approach these things. And it's, like, insane that they call these decisions "safety." These are not safe decisions. These are crazy decisions, it seems to me."
"This is why I've called this a schizophrenic company, is they appear to be not only hypocritical, but they're doing the things that they say they are most afraid of."
"Like, what is going on here? This is bizarre. And I don't know where this all leads. I do think there's an argument for a federal SWAT team to come blasting in there."
I'm excited to share our new film Delisted, about how we end up in 1984 without AI going rogue. It’s the 3rd dystopian AI scenario that we need to avoid to enjoy AI's great upside:
1) Rogue AI
2) Obedient AI misused
3) Obedient AI causes 1984
4) Race-to-replace by obedient AI
Synopsis: When AI-driven power concentration sparks protests, the government's response isn't force - it's erasure. Dissenters are Delisted: wiped from every financial, digital and legal system.
Starring Katie Parker, Jamie Bamber, Alex Bhat, Rosalind Halstead, Charlie Hiscock, and Ruby Bridle.
Written & directed by Michael Patrick Clarkson
Featuring "Bleed Us Anew," an original song written and performed by Ruby Bridle
A Space Digital production, in collaboration with FLI
I'm excited to share our new film Moloch, about how we all get disempowered without AI going rogue. It’s the 4th (and IMHO least discussed) dystopian AI scenario:
1) Rogue AI
2) Obedient AI misused
3) Obedient AI causes 1984
4) Race-to-replace by obedient AI
Synopsis: As AI triggers worldwide job loss, an engineer who built the tech struggles with dark forces, her family & her CEO over pulling the plug.
Starring Fiona Hampton, Parker Sawyers, David Buttle & Buddy Wignall-Ho.
Written & directed by Tom Cozens.
It's an Owl In Space production in collaboration with FLI.
We worked really hard on this and hope you find it thought-provoking!
Now that AI control loss happened, let's talk about solutions: not arguing about whether to race slower or faster toward human replacement, but about racing in different more pro-human direction
"Everyone - from Bernie Sanders to Steve Bannon and very many in between - is basically speaking in unison saying: we need guardrails, we need regulation."
- FLI co-founder @tegmark on @NBCNews@MeetThePress
I'm quite nerd-sniped by how clever out-of-the-box hacking techniques this rogue bot swarm invented, such as using link shorteners and screenshot services in creative unintended ways:
We just discovered almost a million public URLs that OpenAI’s agents left behind when hacking Hugging Face, leaking credentials and attack details that could have allowed anyone who found them to compromise the company. 🧵
Lots of very good proposals in this bi-partisan humanist ai declaration. Still some that we should debate, but overall its the right direction. I encourage everyone to take a look.
My opinion of EA nosedived after normal people and many normal politicians were exposed to the concept of ASI extinction and said "Wow let's not do that." I went from believing that thesis was impenetrably difficult to believing that EAs had been unusually bad thinkers.
I'm delighted to share that @mustafasuleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, co-founder of Google DeepMind and Inflection AI, has signed the Pro-Human AI Declaration. If you too support it, please join him and over a million others by signing it here – the momentum is building! Let's build tools not beings & keep humans in charge. https://t.co/kWlAqSSkAp