I hate to say it, but I’m done making excuses for President Trump.
The things he’s done this term genuinely infuriate me:
• Calling the Epstein files “fake news” and a scam
• Starting a full-blown war with Iran after he already took out their nuclear sites
• Turning into a full-blown Zionist cheerleader
• Repeatedly claiming inflation is “down” while we’re all getting crushed by higher prices on gas, groceries, and everything else
I voted for him three times.
But I’m tired of the lying. America First should actually mean America First, not Israel, not Ukraine, not only his family and friends ... AMERICA.
I think I speak on behalf of many when I say that we have heard the same routine to the point of exhaustion. If you can't identify a factual error in what @RealCandaceO has said, then the constant personal attacks, pejoratives and jobations accomplish nothing. Address the evidence, challenge the arguments and point to specific mistakes or (as the kids say) STFU. Otherwise, those of us who still value critical thinking have heard enough. Either offer a reasoned rebuttal or find another hobby, because repeating the same talking points is not an argument. And referring to her is demonic or evil means absolutely nothing. Are we clear on this?
President Trump,
Thank you for bringing attention to our fraudlent elections.
We must pass the SAVE America Act.
Please consider also letting incumbent Senators know that — if they don’t secure our elections — you will help campaign & support primaries against them.
We need your help — peacefully — playing hardball.
Respectfully.
@FBIDirectorKash@FBI_Response Hey Kash I think your account may have been hacked. You actually sound like you're going to do something. It can't be you.
Hi Viva!
I’m the one who initially broke this story way back in January so I can help you out here. I reported that Tyler went to Panguitch and he ordered the a steak, medium rare, which came with a side of mashed potatoes and vegetables. He did not order any beer and I made it clear at that time that the cameras at the restaurant were inoperable, but that Tyler paid with his card. (I believe I said credit card—so I indeed stand corrected if it was debit instead. Credit and debit cards tend to look alike, so forgive the mistake).
The receipt you are looking at is real and reflects my reporting. Tyler Robinson did not leave until approximately 10pm that evening.
Outside of a bullet train, it’s going to be a tough sell to explain how he could have possibly made it back to Orem shortly after midnight in time to be pulled over.
Going to have to drop a lot more cash on overwhelmed influencers and bodycam crashes, I suspect.
Great work @DiligentDenizen following up on this story. As we all know, there will be more to come!
Our government took zero responsibility for lockdowns, vaccine socialism, vaccine mandates, mask mandates and mentally abusing schoolchildren with insane rules for years.
No foreign country made them do that.
The data was clear. Still they robbed and abused everyone.
Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along!
Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.”
They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying.
I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself.
What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude.
Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.”
To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few:
THE OTHER GUNMAN
An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case.
He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up.
DISPATCH AUDIO
911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.”
DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE
The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.”
DNA DISCREPANCIES
Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle.
INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS
During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment.
THE UNFIRED BULLET
During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was.
ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO
Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom.
As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims.
Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.”
As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture.
Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones.
And… exhale.
These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk.
What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions.
Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice.
This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people.
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
Mikki Willis
Investigative Filmmaker
The real stolen election is that 90% of Congress is compromised, both Presidential candidates were purchased (so we can’t vote our way out of it) and even when you voted for Trump you got a Covid lockdown then the deep state war.
The people in on it aren’t fixing the issue.
If I were the Republican Party, I would do a query for every address where 6+ voters are registered.
Then, I would go through that list to look for how many of those addresses are P.O. Boxes, vacant lots, malls, businesses, churches, shelters, or other non-residential locations.
Then, after locating those non-residential locations, I would see how many of those voters voted & whether they voted by mail.
Narrative: Robinson hated Kirk for anti LGBT positions. He's a leftist! He's antifa! Right?
Boyfriend's testimony: he rarely if ever talked politics and he NEVER mentioned Charlie Kirk
I seriously can't believe the anti-Candace brigade won't acknowledge how bizarre this is.
A political assassin never talked about his victim and barely ever talked politics and they just moved on as if this is normal.
It's not normal. Honestly it reads like a frame job. But TPUSA just chugs along like this testimony didn't happen.
Huge chunks of this story are B.S.
It bothers me to no end.
I covered the Twiggs testimony and the lying influencer brigade last night on LL if interested.
If you didn't watch the court proceedings last week I implore you to tune in. The narrative makes zero sense and you should stop listening to the paid liars who ignore the truth about it.
Real question and I don’t care who it pisses off, why should we vote for Republicans in November?
Mass deportations aren’t happening. Most of us are single issue voters on immigration and DHS under Markwayne has decided they would rather appease CNN and MSNBC.
Republicans won’t pass Save America, they won’t support the mass deportations we voted for. They haven’t done, frankly, jack shit outside of a tax cut extension.
So why? Why push Maine to vote for Susan Collins? Because at least she’s not an admitted communist? In the end, though, what’s really the difference?
Vote Republican, get Democrat policy anyway.
Thomas Massie is a GREAT American that tried to stop Republicans from betraying America by tying our military and intelligence to a foreign country’s military and intelligence.
You are a vile and disgusting paid neocon political consultant.
Everything we voted against in 2024.
Let’s clear this up.
You personally told me via phone that his invite was because they were spending an offensive amount of money and had additionally structured some financial deal regarding some documentary.
Do you deny this? That you said Ben was buying his way into Amfest to spite me after my firing?
Every Republican Senator voted to merge our military with Israel’s military.
The most America LAST thing they could possibly do, selling our military out to a foreign country.
It’s absolute treason and betrayal.
Did they allow you to hold his blood stained microphone like you so giddily declared?
Did you want it because it’s likely what exploded and killed him?