Comment: "it goes to show you how pathetically weak white people are that they can be mogged and bullied by blacks that don't even make up 1% of the population. Big bad cowboy Montana lol!"
Response: Hold your tongue. I used to work as a ranch hand in Montana before I moved to NY in 1980.
When I was growing up in Montana, it wasn't this way. Montana was populated strictly by Whites and American Indians and was on the opposite end of the political spectrum.
But since then, Montana has been filling up with rich white "yuppies" escaping from the tax burdens created by their own politics in places like California and New York and the west and east coasts in general (along with libtard strongholds like Illinois and Colorado).
Also bear in mind that urban police forces are no better in Montana than they are anywhere else these days. All their paymasters have to do is threaten to fire them, and they'll turn on their own families and friends rather than lose their pretty blue costumes and shiny little badges. This puts them squarely on the side of the "persecuted minorities" they're told they must protect from "White Supremacists" when they receive their training in Israel or equivalent.
Decades ago, when the FBI began training its personnel in Israel of all places, they were being told that the US was a bastion of White-racist terrorism, and assured that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other US Founding Fathers were vile White Supremacists in need of suppression. (My initial source was one of their training videos that was circulating on the Internet back in the late 1990s and 2000s.) That's how we ended up with the likes of James Comey as FBI Director.
Modern cops aren't the Irish-American beat-paddies of yore, but a national autoimmune disease. When I was bar bouncing in NY, a Black coke dealer could set up shop in a dark corner of the bar, the police could be called, and any Whites who had tried to dissuade the drug dealer, including bouncers, were threatened with arrest (or arrested). If officially ordered to do so, urban cops would have shat a rainbow brick on command, and now they're even worse. Blame the enforcers and their bosses for this travesty, not indigenous Montanans.
The vast majority of Montana locals want all of these newcomers gone, and permanently. If it hadn't been for the rapacious Montana Chamber of Commerce ("Welcome to Big Sky Country! Make sure you bring plenty of money!") and the State University system, the libtard yupsters would never have gotten wise to Rocky Mountain living in the first place, and Montana would still look pretty much like it used to.
Trump or no Trump, unvetted nonwhite migrants are still being shipped in by the hundreds of thousands and strategically distributed throughout the United States. In fact, well after Trump was elected, we suddenly got a load of them right across the street in an all-White town with a population of under a thousand and a county of three thousand.
What a loss, and it's only getting worse. We've been / are being methodically set up for total destruction.
It's now or never, folks.
Men worldwide have killed between 150 and 570 million people in wars in all of history.
Women worldwide have aborted between 1.5 and 2.5 billion of their own children since 1980.
Think about that.
This caught my attention because it's at the top of my feed and it happened in Montana, where I used to live. Demographically, that makes it a bit of a rarity.
"Tee hee!" chuckle de negro. "Dat felt goooood! I hates me some Whitey, a dat make me feel betta! Now gimme anutha beer, de nite juss got started!"
It looks like Billings, Montana dropped the ball when it came to this particular offender. I think it's time we called a spade a spade, and started using the "e" word more often. Eugenics would have solved this problem in a pre-crime sort of way. No angry negroes filled with "black rage", no black-on-white hate crime!
In fact, given that this is a repeat offender who could easily have killed his victim, I'd say that a combination of mandatory sterilization and prison might actually be appropriate. Incarceration would temporarily protect other people from harm, while sterilization would prevent the unnecessary spread of congenital criminality.
Some might object that mandatory sterilization would be a clear violation of the offender's civil rights. Granted, but we have a decision to make. Without prophylactic measures, this single criminal could multiply and become up to a hundred White-hating street vermin in as little as a year, depending on his access to neighborhood "hoes". (Note that if he receives a vasectomy, that harm could be avoided, and he could still achieve sexual bliss with estrous hoodrat pleasure-hoes between assaults on White women.)
Think about it. Unless the breeding cycle is interdicted, in as little as 30 years we could be looking at a hundred squared = ten thousand violent criminals prowling the streets, carrying the offender's defective DNA and sucker-punching the last few White women who remain alive. Not to mention constantly chimping out, sucking up taxpayer resources, and using the "education system" to prey on the few remaining White children like cuckoo chicks in the nests of doves.
Mandatory deportation is another option. However, this would have a downside: breeding cycles would continue to generate more criminals in Africa. As we know by 60 long years of mindless sadistic repetition, these criminals would eventually be imported to the US as "refugees" at the behest of the Zionist lobby. So we'd be right back to square 1.
Take your pick. I realize that this post might appear a bit insensitive, but literally everything else has been tried to no avail.
This is hilarious, I had a thought imagine showing Ww2 soldiers a glimpse of the futureโฆ. Ainโt no way they going to join the war there was no point
What I'm about to write pains me, truly, but here it goes:
This is the moment ladies. Right now. This is it.
The response to Lindsay Clancy stunned so many men because she embodies the threat that women have been holding over all of our heads my entire life, which is ""I'll do what I want and if you don't like, too bad. I'll just kill society." She killed her children for convenience or to punish him or for whatever her selfish reason was, just as women in the aggregate are killing civilization out of seeming selfishness and spite.
Ladies, the privileges of modernity are ending, whether you want them to or not. It'll just depend who ends them and what replaces them.
Much of this so-called hatred of women isn't hatred of woman AS woman. It's an incredible frustration with the fact women wanted the ball and got it, and promptly fumbled it and refuse to accept accountability.
Yes, lots of women are brilliant and capable but in the aggregate, they did not perform. You wanted it and our ancestors gave you the chance, and you did not deliver. There is no denying this. That's why feminists adopted the trans ideology so aggressively. It lets them claim the achievements of men as the achievements of women.
Women are the majority of college grads and even employees now, but they haven't produced. Media tried to sell Kamala Harris as competent and Hillary Clinton as "the most qualified person to ever run for the White House," a lie so comically absurd that it's astonishing. Every "great" women CEO or scientist is, compared to men, a middling and moderate performer. The most high profile of them are most likely to end up in jail for fraud like Elizabeth Holmes.
Women haven't produced in business or politics or science or in any of the domains they've spent a century demanding access to. They've been given every advantage to make up for so-called oppression and they've accomplished next to nothing. Even in this zero-sum situation where helping women, by definition, hurts men, men are still consistently outperforming women in every domain.
Worse, where women have power, they're using it catastrophically. Women politicians are, globally, producing catastrophic outcomes while clearly preferring being influencers to wielding authority. There simply are no great women leaders.
Pointing this out isn't "hating women." It's about bringing to the surface what matters because real oppression is coming. It's not going to be some feminist fantasy oppression. I'm talking about REAL oppression; abuse, rape, violence, and disenfranchisement; women being stripped of all of the contributions to society except being broodmares. Everything they've accused Western men of doing (but who never would) is coming.
Women are different than men. They're equal only in dignity. Society must reflect this or all is lost.
I hate this because I'm an egalitarian at heart. I hate that I've had to, at this stage in my life, adopt positions that I once recognized as abhorrently sexist or racist. I yield to reality though. Sir Francis Bacon once wrote that "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." Well I obey. If we're to survive, women are going to have to do the same, but there seems to be little interest from women in doing that.
How are men supposed to respond to that?
Well, most men are simply resigning themselves to death, and the death of their civilization at your hands, like a father watching his wife trans his kid and being unwilling to do what it takes to stop her.
I wish 20th century egalitarianism was true. I wish "girl power" was a thing. I wish there was a women Einstein and Mozart or Caesar. There isn't. It's time we came to terms with that.
@FloBro__ I have seen some of his rants on getting rid of immigrants, but I agree his the fuck could you sit there and watch him hold hands with an Asian. You can tell she will eat him alive.