it occurred to me the other day that “AI” is fundamentally our era’s Acts of Enclosure: claiming the intellectual commons as private property, now metered and resold to those who formerly benefited from it as a common human resource
there is an argument (which I've made privately until now) that one of the principal innovations of the large language model labs is a *legal* innovation, not a technical one
by building a system that hoovers up mind-bogglingly large volumes of human information and feeds it into a recombinatorial association machine, the companies have bulldozed the existing IP regime and made the contents of ~all human IP (including the most mundane) searchable, reconfigurable, and usable while also obscuring any trace of origin and eliminating a need to provide credit or attribution. much of the perceived benefit is therefore access and exposure to IP people would not otherwise have had access to, presented behind a system that abstracts the IP from its context and history and presents it as net-new information.
I imagine we would have seen ~similar productivity outcomes had Google actually been allowed to make productive use of the Google Books database over a decade ago.
we should anticipate a consequent intellectual proletarianization, a new mass class with nothing to sell but themselves, cut off forever from what was formerly “wisdom,” “intuition,” and common knowledge
Dear friends, during some recent medical examinations, the doctors found a small, localized nodule in my lung. It was detected at a very early stage and is well-localized. The doctors believe that it is best to intervene, so, following their advice, I have decided to undergo surgery to remove it. The operation is already scheduled to take place in the coming days. I thank you for your spiritual closeness and entrust myself to your prayers.
incidentally I was reading in Rosmarie Waldrop’s amazing book on Edmond Jabès that he would go to the beach and collect pebbles that looked like faces and give them to his friends, which imo is a pretty good candidate for the acme of human life
this characteristic does not, for instance, make you good at farming, dancing, lovemaking, cooking, teaching, or playing music
perhaps why certain people on this app propose a future in which these things are done by machines
a lot of you are intellectually deformed by having been convinced, when young, that a certain characteristic which you possess — a kind of arrogant obstinacy, useful for test-taking, computer code, and almost nothing else — is called “intelligence”