@akothari If they are smart, they will have clauses in the contracts that allow them to reallocate compute back to their own models if they need it if demand picks up
@DanielvsBabylon Interesting.. you donβt think the garden was a physical place on Earth then? Agree pre-existence of souls is not biblically supported
@milesdeutscher This assumes the models are the only driver of progress in the AI space. Half of the value is in the harness. Much more progress to come
@luke_metro@MarcusMilione This assumes one knows how to use Figma. I would rather tell Claude Design it didnβt get it right 10 times than even begin to understand how to use Figma
@nikitabier@LangmanVince Can you make a feature where you hash a video when it is uploaded for the first time and check future uploads against the same hash to check if it is a duplicate? If a duplicate is detected you could credit the original poster
@OpTic_BigTymeR Tried Claude Design yet? I just used it for a work project (Iβm a dev at global pharma company) and it worked a treat. I can give you the whistle stop tour
@GergelyOrosz Companies will build their own internal tools until SaaS prices come down, then theyβll move back to buying off the shelf again. We pay $300k a year for 300 seats of basic ServiceNow ITSM. Absolutely insane
@thsottiaux@Yuchenj_UW Implying that using AI to build creates worse products than writing manually? Weird thing for someone building an AI coding product to say
@mlund100@kale_abe Borrow BTC, sell it straight away.
If price goes down further then they can buy it back at the cheaper price to pay back the borrowed BTC and keep the proceeds from selling the BTC they borrowed. This is called shorting