Jaska

Digital Market Strategist | ₿et More | Multi Chain Maxxing | Vision Precedes Action ❀

[Jaska @0xJaska]

We are going to win so much we are going to get tired of winning

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@MarketBubble Let’s go 🔥

[Market Bubble @MarketBubble]

GIVING SOMEONE WHO LIKES THIS TWEET $1,000 IN THE NEXT 10 MINUTES! GO!

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@roarsofthebear Free Roomba

[0XGIWA @0xgiwa]

hafa @moonpay

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@moonpay we are hungry

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@UnitedGyal @ProjectTurmoil @AkadeBemsen ^this always have your own account

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@shawmakesmagic @brian_armstrong @ChangeNOW_io

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@fadule_ and 10000 chemicals

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@realmatt_re Propaganda

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@kinggablim wen airdrop

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@LifeMathMoney Fair

[autist @litteralyme0]

Growing up hearing “Wikipedia isn't a valid source” and then entering a workplace where people say “just ask ChatGPT” is a surprisingly strange timeline

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@MorriganFaire @jakeshieldsajj Your government killed its own people and convinced the public that the perpetrators were terrorists hiding among civilians and children, claiming they sought to destroy your country. This narrative was used to justify actions that furthered an agenda of territorial expansion.

[Vincent (Cryptolution) 👑 @Cryptolution]

December 9, 2010. A user asks Satoshi Nakamoto why Bitcoin shouldn't just allow 64 or 128 bytes of "arbitrary data" in a transaction.

His answer, verbatim:

"I also support a third transaction type for timestamp hash sized arbitrary data. There's no point not having one since you can already do it anyway. It would tell nodes they don't need to bother to index it."

Read the design spec inside that answer. Small. Standardized. Not indexed by nodes.

Bitcoin Core shipped that exact spec in March 2014. It's called OP_RETURN.

#Runes lives entirely inside OP_RETURN. One runestone per transaction, prunable, zero UTXO bloat, full market fees. #Ordinals pays the same toll through witness space. The only gatekeeper Satoshi ever wrote into the system was the fee. Both pay it.

Now read BIP110. It proposes to reject the exact transaction class Satoshi said he supports, from the channel built to his own spec.

That is not enforcing Satoshi's design. That is reversing it.

And we already ran this experiment. In this same December 2010 thread, miners holding double digit hashrate publicly refused to filter non-standard transactions. Satoshi's response was not a crackdown. It was the quote above.

Fees settled this in 2010. Fees are settling it again in 2026.

Source: https://t.co/5zygotHxDK

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@MarioNawfal Lizard man

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@MarioNawfal @Clavicular0 Gang ritual

[Jaska @0xJaska]

@MarindaVannoy1 @ClownWorld If you don’t tip you’re poor