0xMaster

Crypto Class of 2017. Finding the best yields across #DeFi
@ramsesstats

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@udiWertheimer Lol

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

Correcto. Yo te recomiendo al 100% @RamsesExchange

Son developers con mucha experiencia en este mercado.

Si quieres conocer mas, puedes leer los documentos del protocolo en https://t.co/xglwTBdxje

Y si quieres ver los stats mas potentes y como se comparan con otros protocolos como Nest aqui puedes ver

https://t.co/5qtWksaCTn

Y para comprar $RAM, puedes ir a la pagina oficial de Ramses; https://t.co/Fpk9P4PPO6

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@Jimitza84 @DonVsol @NestExchange No, @RamsesExchange no es de Avalanche.

@PharaohExchange es el de Avalanche

Ramses es exclusivamente de HyperEVM

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@HoodieChicken @prjx_hl @NestExchange over the long term, the emission-based pool should beat the fee based pool of prjx

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@LHBCrypto Insanely beautiful

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@Ramsesstats I hope we can sustain this shit all the way to the end of the epoch.

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@Ramsesstats @RamsesExchange

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@cagyjan1 No way bro! Congrats!!

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@mathburn666 Sorry to break it bro, but how is this sustainable over the long term?

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@Ramsesstats Ohh that's quite impressive

Are we sure we didn't increase emissions?

[Ramses Stats @Ramsesstats]

gRAM

Only to those who celebrate 🎉

Ramses is projected to make $135,000+ in revenue for the epoch 🚀

Track it live on:

https://t.co/ibXJQkvLHP

That's an increase of 90% over last epoch without increasing the emissions spend.

Of course, this is a projection and it is still early.

hyperliquid:native

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@bodybuidler @NestExchange Very interesting

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@MrButlerhl @NestExchange my man do you even know about IL?

No, you won't be making a clean $41k a year

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

Damn based on that stats competition page, as I previously discussed on one of my tweets, the $NEST lockers are going to have a rough time if the income does not catch up to emissions fast enough.

Thats why the people that know about these systems are already selling $veNEST at a 48% discount.

hyperliquid:native

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@northpool9 Only in trumps world lol

thats just the daily pump of fake narratives to prop up the market

[Ramses Stats @Ramsesstats]

gRAM

Ramses is projected to make $70,090 for their $xRAM voters this epoch. 🔥

The protocol is only spending $31,579 in emissions to achieve this.

$RAM is the MOST efficient/healthy protocol in the history of emission-based protocols.

https://t.co/rRHJ5AytNV

hyperliquid:native

[0xMaster @0xMasterCrypto1]

@mastermojo83 @NestExchange oh very nice

[Ramses Stats @Ramsesstats]

Important difference between @RamsesExchange and @NestExchange :

Both use emissions to pay LPs, but the claim path is different with a very different trust model.

On Nest, gauge-level emissions are stored on-chain, but user-level LP claims depend on an off-chain signer. Users claim through GaugeRewarder with:

claim(totalAmount, deadline, signature)

The contract checks that the signature came from signer() before releasing $NEST.

That means Nest has a trust assumption in the emissions claim layer.

But what does it mean exactly?

->signer compromised -> invalid claims can be authorized up to the funded balance
-> signer offline -> new claims cannot be signed
->signer refuses to sign -> a user can be censored at the claim layer
-> admin changes signer -> same trust surface moves to the new key
-> That also means the displayed APR "can" be different than the realized claim.

$RAM does not have that off-chain signer step.

Ramses emissions flow through on-chain voter/gauge accounting. Allocation is derived from votes and gauge state, and LP rewards do not depend on a separate signer approving each user’s claim.

That is the design difference.

Nest manages rewards off-chain.

Ramses keeps the emission path on-chain. NO trust assumption. NO operational risk.

hyperliquid:native