Olivia
Online
MavexAI
@0xMavex
Just a guy exploring AI, tech, and online business
Sharing useful tools, ideas, and things worth paying attention to
Joined February 2025
54 Following
99 Followers
90 Posts
Pinned Tweet
https://t.co/yAPzCdImME
A 20-YEAR-OLD IN LONDON MADE $21,300 LAST MONTH RUNNING AI MODEL ACCOUNTS. SHE DOESN'T GENERATE A SINGLE ORIGINAL VIDEO.
she copies ones that already went viral.
everyone else prompts from scratch and prays. the render looks generated, the motion looks wrong, the clip dies at 300 views.
she does the opposite. she finds an ig reel that already hit - proven hook, proven audio, proven pacing - and puts her ai girl inside it. frame for frame. same turn of the head, same blink, no lag, no drift.
split-screen it and you can't tell which side is the human.
that's the whole business. she's not guessing what works. the algorithm already voted before she touched it.
→ pull reels in your niche with proven view counts. the format is the asset, not the girl
→ one locked face - blonde, black lace, pearls, same cross necklace in every frame or the illusion breaks
→ map the reel onto her. motion, timing, expression, 1:1
→ run 4 accounts at once. same girl, different feeds, different niches
month 1: $700. mostly failed renders.
month 3: $4,800.
last month: $21,300.
the catch nobody posts: $21,300 was her peak, normal runs $11-14 k. copying reels means you also inherit their ceiling - you'll never beat the original, only match it. and close-ups still betray you: hands and teeth are where the frame falls apart. she keeps the camera at chest distance for a reason.
stop trying to invent the viral clip.
find one that already is, and walk into it.
Save this.
@choopyplug1 The shift from prompters to curators is going to change everything
A 20-YEAR-OLD IN LONDON MADE $21,300 LAST MONTH RUNNING AI MODEL ACCOUNTS. SHE DOESN'T GENERATE A SINGLE ORIGINAL VIDEO.
she copies ones that already went viral.
everyone else prompts from scratch and prays. the render looks generated, the motion looks wrong, the clip dies at 300 views.
she does the opposite. she finds an ig reel that already hit - proven hook, proven audio, proven pacing - and puts her ai girl inside it. frame for frame. same turn of the head, same blink, no lag, no drift.
split-screen it and you can't tell which side is the human.
that's the whole business. she's not guessing what works. the algorithm already voted before she touched it.
→ pull reels in your niche with proven view counts. the format is the asset, not the girl
→ one locked face - blonde, black lace, pearls, same cross necklace in every frame or the illusion breaks
→ map the reel onto her. motion, timing, expression, 1:1
→ run 4 accounts at once. same girl, different feeds, different niches
month 1: $700. mostly failed renders.
month 3: $4,800.
last month: $21,300.
the catch nobody posts: $21,300 was her peak, normal runs $11-14 k. copying reels means you also inherit their ceiling - you'll never beat the original, only match it. and close-ups still betray you: hands and teeth are where the frame falls apart. she keeps the camera at chest distance for a reason.
stop trying to invent the viral clip.
find one that already is, and walk into it.
Save this.
https://t.co/nV21NowVNV
$28,940 last month. one operator. zero cameras. zero people.
a 20-year-old in Prague ships 35 brand ads a week with a girl who has never existed.
her competitors are all chasing the same thing: a prettier render. cleaner light. smoother skin.
that's why their ads die. perfect reads as paid.
her clips look like a phone left on a shelf. red pajamas. a hallway. a light switch in frame. nobody lit that.
the flaw IS the ad.
the pipeline:
→ claude writes her whole life before a pixel exists - town, job, one flaw, the products she'd actually buy
→ every script hooks inside 2 seconds or it doesn't ship
→ one locked face into higgsfield. same girl, every video, or nothing works
→ nine versions of the same ad, shipped before breakfast
month 1: $900 and a lot of broken hands.
month 3: retainers, not clips. $5,400.
last month: $28,940. brands dm her first now.
the catch nobody posts: that was her best month - normal is $16-21 k. and she tells brands it's ai before signing. the ones faking "real creator" are one thread away from losing everything.
studios still charge $7,500 to film this.
she hasn't told them yet.
$28,940 last month. one operator. zero cameras. zero people.
a 20-year-old in Prague ships 35 brand ads a week with a girl who has never existed.
her competitors are all chasing the same thing: a prettier render. cleaner light. smoother skin.
that's why their ads die. perfect reads as paid.
her clips look like a phone left on a shelf. red pajamas. a hallway. a light switch in frame. nobody lit that.
the flaw IS the ad.
the pipeline:
→ claude writes her whole life before a pixel exists - town, job, one flaw, the products she'd actually buy
→ every script hooks inside 2 seconds or it doesn't ship
→ one locked face into higgsfield. same girl, every video, or nothing works
→ nine versions of the same ad, shipped before breakfast
month 1: $900 and a lot of broken hands.
month 3: retainers, not clips. $5,400.
last month: $28,940. brands dm her first now.
the catch nobody posts: that was her best month - normal is $16-21 k. and she tells brands it's ai before signing. the ones faking "real creator" are one thread away from losing everything.
studios still charge $7,500 to film this.
she hasn't told them yet.
https://t.co/sSGcmf0sBz
$8,460 IN 44 DAYS. FROM A CONSTRUCTION WORKER WHO DOESN'T EXIST.
$150 in. 941 men paying $8.99 each. not one of them will ever meet her.
no bikini. no gym mirror. no beach.
she's bent over a demolition hammer, breaking up a concrete floor in a gutted apartment. black leggings caked in dust. cement bags stacked behind her. rubble under her sneakers.
that's the whole business. and almost every AI girl page misses it.
every page looks the same now. gym, mirror, beach, gold chain. men's thumbs skip it on reflex. pretty is wallpaper.
a girl running a jackhammer through a floor? the thumb stops. "wait - why is she doing THAT, dressed like that." that half-second of confusion is the click. loud machine, dust, destruction, the body - the brain can't file it fast enough. tiktok reads the rewatch and the double-take and shoves the clip into more feeds.
a 23-year-old in argentina built the whole thing. here's the funnel:
→ tiktok clips of her working the site. free. engineered for the double-take
→ bio link to an $8.99 fanvue sub. more behind the paywall
→ one locked character sheet: same face, same body, same dusty leggings, every single clip
the numbers:
day 1: first clips up. $0.
day ~11: the $150 media budget fully covered. pure profit from here.
day 44: 941 subscribers. $8,460.
the catch nobody posts: $8,460 is total, not monthly. the gimmick buys the click, not the loyalty - break character between clips and the subs churn out as fast as they came. "construction girl" stops being untapped the week ten copycats trend it. he had first-mover. they won't. and run her as a "real girl" instead of labeling her AI, and one exposure thread ends the account and the income with it.
the lesson isn't "make an AI girl."
it's: when the niche is drowning in pretty, pretty loses. win on "wait, what?"
the dust is fake. the floor is fake. the $8,460 isn't.
$8,460 IN 44 DAYS. FROM A CONSTRUCTION WORKER WHO DOESN'T EXIST.
$150 in. 941 men paying $8.99 each. not one of them will ever meet her.
no bikini. no gym mirror. no beach.
she's bent over a demolition hammer, breaking up a concrete floor in a gutted apartment. black leggings caked in dust. cement bags stacked behind her. rubble under her sneakers.
that's the whole business. and almost every AI girl page misses it.
every page looks the same now. gym, mirror, beach, gold chain. men's thumbs skip it on reflex. pretty is wallpaper.
a girl running a jackhammer through a floor? the thumb stops. "wait - why is she doing THAT, dressed like that." that half-second of confusion is the click. loud machine, dust, destruction, the body - the brain can't file it fast enough. tiktok reads the rewatch and the double-take and shoves the clip into more feeds.
a 23-year-old in argentina built the whole thing. here's the funnel:
→ tiktok clips of her working the site. free. engineered for the double-take
→ bio link to an $8.99 fanvue sub. more behind the paywall
→ one locked character sheet: same face, same body, same dusty leggings, every single clip
the numbers:
day 1: first clips up. $0.
day ~11: the $150 media budget fully covered. pure profit from here.
day 44: 941 subscribers. $8,460.
the catch nobody posts: $8,460 is total, not monthly. the gimmick buys the click, not the loyalty - break character between clips and the subs churn out as fast as they came. "construction girl" stops being untapped the week ten copycats trend it. he had first-mover. they won't. and run her as a "real girl" instead of labeling her AI, and one exposure thread ends the account and the income with it.
the lesson isn't "make an AI girl."
it's: when the niche is drowning in pretty, pretty loses. win on "wait, what?"
the dust is fake. the floor is fake. the $8,460 isn't.
https://t.co/p4teS18nnJ
@tonyprediction Say goodbye to the note graveyard! Claude + Obsidian sounds like the ultimate game changer for personal knowledge
@cryptofleemo Spot on. Shipping unreviewed AI code guarantees technical debt.
she made $74,200 in 38 days. the reason men couldn't scroll past her? spongebob.
not a beach. not a gym mirror. a girl who doesn't exist, dancing in full spongebob pajamas.
every AI girl page looks the same now. gym, mirror, beach, gold chain. men's thumbs are trained to skip it. pretty is background noise.
then a 24-year-old rendered a girl in a spongebob crop top and matching pajama pants, hood up, dancing in a bedroom papered with spongebob posters.
the brain trips. "wait - why is a girl this hot dressed like a cartoon sponge?"
that half-second of confusion is the whole business. tiktok reads the rewatch, the double-take, the "is this even real," and shoves the clip into more feeds.
the funnel:
→ short clips every few hours. posing, turning, dancing. free. built for the double-take → bio link to a $9.99 sub. more behind the paywall → one locked character sheet: same smile, same body, same soft lighting, every single post
fans treated her like a real creator. asked where she bought the pajamas. asked for the same fit in other colors. one guy paid $2,400 for a private set where she wrote his name on the mirror in lipstick.
the system ran all of it. captions, replies, custom requests, the slow zoom-ins. he never left his apartment. she never left the rendered bedroom.
the numbers:
day 1: first clips up. $0. day 14: media spend fully covered. profit from here. day 38: page cleared $74,200 after cuts.
the catch nobody posts: $74,200 is total, not monthly - the gimmick buys the click, not the retention. break the character between posts and subs churn out fast as they came. and spongebob stops being clever the week ten other pages copy it. he had first-mover. the copycats won't.
the lesson isn't "make an AI girl."
it's: when the niche is drowning in pretty, pretty loses. win on "wait, what?"
she was never real. the money never stopped.
Save this.
https://t.co/OwsFmXOLGQ
she made $74,200 in 38 days. the reason men couldn't scroll past her? spongebob.
not a beach. not a gym mirror. a girl who doesn't exist, dancing in full spongebob pajamas.
every AI girl page looks the same now. gym, mirror, beach, gold chain. men's thumbs are trained to skip it. pretty is background noise.
then a 24-year-old rendered a girl in a spongebob crop top and matching pajama pants, hood up, dancing in a bedroom papered with spongebob posters.
the brain trips. "wait - why is a girl this hot dressed like a cartoon sponge?"
that half-second of confusion is the whole business. tiktok reads the rewatch, the double-take, the "is this even real," and shoves the clip into more feeds.
the funnel:
→ short clips every few hours. posing, turning, dancing. free. built for the double-take → bio link to a $9.99 sub. more behind the paywall → one locked character sheet: same smile, same body, same soft lighting, every single post
fans treated her like a real creator. asked where she bought the pajamas. asked for the same fit in other colors. one guy paid $2,400 for a private set where she wrote his name on the mirror in lipstick.
the system ran all of it. captions, replies, custom requests, the slow zoom-ins. he never left his apartment. she never left the rendered bedroom.
the numbers:
day 1: first clips up. $0. day 14: media spend fully covered. profit from here. day 38: page cleared $74,200 after cuts.
the catch nobody posts: $74,200 is total, not monthly - the gimmick buys the click, not the retention. break the character between posts and subs churn out fast as they came. and spongebob stops being clever the week ten other pages copy it. he had first-mover. the copycats won't.
the lesson isn't "make an AI girl."
it's: when the niche is drowning in pretty, pretty loses. win on "wait, what?"
she was never real. the money never stopped.
Save this.
ONE AI DUO MADE $3,000 LAST MONTH ON ONLYFANS.
neither girl exists. and that's not the hook - the fact there's TWO of them is.
a solo AI girl fights ten thousand identical pages. a duo competes with almost nobody.
strawberry and peach costumes. neon LOVE sign behind them. brunette puckers her lips, blonde leans in, a pillow flies across the frame. they laugh like they've been friends for years.
nobody scripted a thirst trap. claude scripted a friendship. subs don't pay for a face - they pay for a dynamic between two. that's what keeps the card on file.
the machine:
→ one character sheet per girl - same two faces every clip or the illusion dies
→ claude writes the playful scripts: costume bits, bedroom skits, dumb little arguments between them
→ new outfits and scenes in minutes. no shoot. no talent. no drama
→ soft playful clips on tiktok/ig pull the crowd. onlyfans sells the access
the numbers, honest slope:
month 1: $0. two faces nobody's met yet.
month 3: a clip pops, first subs. ~$800.
month 6: the duo has regulars. $3,000+ on repeat.
the catch nobody posts: "built once, monetized forever" is a lie - stop posting and it's dead in a week. two girls doubles the work: two faces to keep consistent, two voices in the dms. and platforms want AI labeled now. run them as "real" and one exposure thread kills the account and the income.
real creators burn out.
these two run 24/7 and never fight for real.
Save this.
@onlyfansrush Let's do it!
ONE AI DUO MADE $3,000 LAST MONTH ON ONLYFANS.
neither girl exists. and that's not the hook - the fact there's TWO of them is.
a solo AI girl fights ten thousand identical pages. a duo competes with almost nobody.
strawberry and peach costumes. neon LOVE sign behind them. brunette puckers her lips, blonde leans in, a pillow flies across the frame. they laugh like they've been friends for years.
nobody scripted a thirst trap. claude scripted a friendship. subs don't pay for a face - they pay for a dynamic between two. that's what keeps the card on file.
the machine:
→ one character sheet per girl - same two faces every clip or the illusion dies
→ claude writes the playful scripts: costume bits, bedroom skits, dumb little arguments between them
→ new outfits and scenes in minutes. no shoot. no talent. no drama
→ soft playful clips on tiktok/ig pull the crowd. onlyfans sells the access
the numbers, honest slope:
month 1: $0. two faces nobody's met yet.
month 3: a clip pops, first subs. ~$800.
month 6: the duo has regulars. $3,000+ on repeat.
the catch nobody posts: "built once, monetized forever" is a lie - stop posting and it's dead in a week. two girls doubles the work: two faces to keep consistent, two voices in the dms. and platforms want AI labeled now. run them as "real" and one exposure thread kills the account and the income.
real creators burn out.
these two run 24/7 and never fight for real.
Save this.
https://t.co/eGvzuk22SJ
@choopyplug1 Building AI with AI... the loop is closing faster than we thought
@XXIfomo AI + execution = unmatched leverage. Incredible story🚀
an 17-year-old in Paris made $3,678 in one week posting ai football videos.
his whole setup cost $30.
$20 for claude code. $10 for seedance 2.0. that's it.
his first clips looked great and went nowhere.
that's where everyone gets stuck. good visuals aren't the product anymore - good visuals are everywhere. the story is the product.
so he asked claude code for a repeatable formula. it handed him three rules:
→ faces people already care about
→ one absurd conflict that shouldn't make sense
→ an ending that makes you NEED part two
he tested three ideas. the desert road trip won.
ronaldo, messi, neymar and haaland cruising through the desert in a convertible. then they pick up mbappé - in a full military uniform - who climbs in and orders them to change the music.
it makes zero sense. that's exactly why it worked. 4k, generated in seedance, monument valley in the background. nearly 2 million views. the comments sold it for him: "part 2??"
so he put part 2 behind a paywall.
fanvue page. $5.99 a month. sequels only there.
day 1: 148 subscribers.
next 6 days: 466 more.
614 × $5.99 = $3,677.86 gross. one week.
the catch nobody posts: those are real players' faces. that's not a gray area it's someone else's likeness behind a paid subscription, and platforms pull those accounts with no warning. one report and the whole machine is gone. also $3,678 was the viral-spike week, not a salary - week 2 doesn't repeat unless the next clip lands just as hard. and football-ai is flooding every feed right now. the desert trick works right up until 10,000 people copy it.
here's the real lesson, and it's free:
the first episode gets the views. the second one gets the money.
he built the sequel before the first clip ever went live. the cliffhanger wasn't a lucky accident - it was the business model.
don't make a video. make an episode one.
an 17-year-old in Paris made $3,678 in one week posting ai football videos.
his whole setup cost $30.
$20 for claude code. $10 for seedance 2.0. that's it.
his first clips looked great and went nowhere.
that's where everyone gets stuck. good visuals aren't the product anymore - good visuals are everywhere. the story is the product.
so he asked claude code for a repeatable formula. it handed him three rules:
→ faces people already care about
→ one absurd conflict that shouldn't make sense
→ an ending that makes you NEED part two
he tested three ideas. the desert road trip won.
ronaldo, messi, neymar and haaland cruising through the desert in a convertible. then they pick up mbappé - in a full military uniform - who climbs in and orders them to change the music.
it makes zero sense. that's exactly why it worked. 4k, generated in seedance, monument valley in the background. nearly 2 million views. the comments sold it for him: "part 2??"
so he put part 2 behind a paywall.
fanvue page. $5.99 a month. sequels only there.
day 1: 148 subscribers.
next 6 days: 466 more.
614 × $5.99 = $3,677.86 gross. one week.
the catch nobody posts: those are real players' faces. that's not a gray area it's someone else's likeness behind a paid subscription, and platforms pull those accounts with no warning. one report and the whole machine is gone. also $3,678 was the viral-spike week, not a salary - week 2 doesn't repeat unless the next clip lands just as hard. and football-ai is flooding every feed right now. the desert trick works right up until 10,000 people copy it.
here's the real lesson, and it's free:
the first episode gets the views. the second one gets the money.
he built the sequel before the first clip ever went live. the cliffhanger wasn't a lucky accident - it was the business model.
don't make a video. make an episode one.
https://t.co/p4teS18nnJ
@0xAurexx Incredible tech. Balancing elder care with privacy and dignity is so difficult, but this feels like a step in the exact right direction
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.2M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.4M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.3M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.8M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.2M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.3M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.5M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers