@LoganJastremski@toghrulmaharram If data withholding risk only requires 1 honest party. State transition integrity is still checked on the L1. I’m not sure how it’s anywhere close to “another honest majority L1”
@kobigurk I think things are going well. A lot of pressure on starknet to start open sourcing and a lot more transparency with how engineering is behind the theory when it comes to the end goal of rollups.
@toly I mean most of the fraud proving happens off-chain and only the single step that was faulty is verified on the L1. Are you saying that ofac compliant blocks are so bad that it would take more than 7 days for that L1 transaction to be included? since that’s probably not the case.
Cryptocurrency is a giant scam, although a complicated scam that uses technobabble, heterodox economics and populist anger to obfuscate its functioning. A pitch perfect scam for the post-truth era of social media where trust in institutions and experts is at an all-time low.
@toghrulmaharram Keep seeing the issue of short term censorship come up which CRLists/Force Inclusion doesn’t solve. I wonder what the solution will be :/
@DavidVorick I really find it interesting how @numerai operates to run decentralised model creation tournaments with obfuscated training sets. Proprietary data protected but anyone in the world has the opportunity to build a model and be rewarded.
@pseudotheos Even in the case of enshrined execution layers isn’t that still multichain? But yeah I agree that time and time again we find out decentralisation does matter and cross-chain messaging is hard.
Looking for more digestible introductions to FRI and/or finite fields?
We just dropped a bunch of 2-3 minute youtube videos explaining various conceptual building blocks!
[1/ ]