Would appreciate if you don't jump to conclusions! If you have any inquiries, please message me directly. We've had a admin key that's been compromised, tokens have been bought back + liquidity has been re-added.
I've made an announcement on the official account.
Sorry for the trouble!
@buildwithmogul Good to have you back. It's easy to lose track of what's the most important to you in this space. Emotions entirely dependent whether if numbers are up or down that day.
Seems like we've come to a similar revelation at a similar time!
SONIC's DYNAMIC BLOCKSPEED
🧵 1/2
Sonic is the only EVM (in BCB's dataset) that dynamically adjusts block publishing rates based on demand and transaction volume.
Sonic's block publishing speed can fluctuate by up to 60%, whereas other EVMs maintain a constant rate, as illustrated below.
This variability is a feature, as it helps mitigate network congestion during sudden transaction surges.
Additionally, by increasing the number of blocks when demand is high, Sonic reduces competition for blockspace, leading to lower transaction fees. 👇
You weren’t there, man.
We’ve been clear from the start—zero utility. Under-promise, over-deliver. That’s the name of the game.
DoctorDefi’s claim is even more ridiculous. His comments were met with scorn on our TG channel and X.
See for yourself:
https://t.co/CPwN3KbhpM
1. Seeding LP before Fjord claims is standard. Otherwise, bad actors could create their own pools for malicious reasons.
2. His main concern? That seeding first lets the team dump. Takes 10 seconds on Dexscreener to verify the only transactions there were buys.
Love how he doubled-down on it being BAD even though it's objectively the right thing to do.
Small print: "oh BoomDEX was ok though...."
Pure engagement-seeking FUD. Nothing more.
Ok, so will clarify few things.
Seeding liquidity much before presale claim is considered bad. Period!
Why? This method has been used for ages for insiders to dump tokens before presale buyers get there token.
Note: This is not the case with @BoomDEX $BOOM even though liquidity was added before claim. There were no insiders/team which did that looking onchain.
But the optics looks bad.
@krackthecode @Second_Aligner @JamHotJord We’ve been clear from the start—no utility, no false promises. Total transparency.
We under-promise and over-deliver.
The team hasn’t sold a single token. We’ve done everything by the book, yet still getting heavily FUD'd.
and apparently it's wrong to add LP before claim? lol