Don't use this
Build your own software using their tokens
So when their tokens become too expensive
You can switch to your own GPUs
Your compute. That you control
So you yourself can't be controlled
You need to control your stack -- or you become enslaved
OpenAI just rug pulled ChatGPT Pro users.
Pro $200 reopens tomorrow. The usage you get for it is cut in half.
Their pitch: models are cheaper now, so you still get more done. But the $200 plan now buys half the compute it did a month ago.
Meanwhile Opus 5.5 is the best model in the world and Claude Max limits feel unlimited.
Anthropic is so far ahead right now.
We may have reached the singularity with digital experiences. Opus 5.5 has proven that it's capable of producing tasteful, well-designed experiences, like this example here.
Any digital experience will likely be commoditised, personalised and available to anyone who seeks it. In the near future, any digital experience you can think of will probably be generated in minutes, or even seconds.
I'm still not sure what to think of this. On one side, it's amazing, we'll enter an era of digital content abundance. Whatever you seek to experience, learn or play, you'll be able to generate it in seconds.
On the flip side, the joy of creation will be largely diminished, because any experience you could think of will probably have been generated by someone else already.
I think premium gaming experiences and amazing movies by human directors will still exist, but that high bar is slowly getting eaten up by generative AI, and I can foresee a future where it surpasses even that.
What a time to be alive to experience this.
Play Little Habitats here (works well on mobile too)
https://t.co/VqUJUKlsIr
This mini-game is built by Opus 5.5 in 2+ hours.
클로드 Opus 5.5와 영상에 있는 모션 그래픽 만들어봤는데요!!
어제부터 틈틈이.. Claude Opus 5.5와 총 1시간 정도 작업한 결과입니다.
--> 엔비디아 블랙웰 GPU를 소재로 이런 3D 애니메이션을 만들어봤습니다.
데이터센터 안으로 들어가고, 서버를 열고, 그래픽카드를 분해하고, 칩 안으로 계속 들어가는 등.. Opus 5.5가 넘 알잘딱하게 만들어줬습니다.
엔비디아 블랙웰 통짜(?)에서 주변 부품 뜯고, 회로를 지나고, 트랜지스터를 지나서… 마지막엔 실리콘 원자 하나까지..
그리고 이거..
--> 단일 브라우저(HTML)에서 돌아가는 3D 모션 그래픽입니다 ㅋㅋㅋ
클로드랑 약 1시간 작업해서 이런 단일 HTML를 만들 수 있다는 게 아직도 좀 신기하네요.
이번 Opus 5.5 진짜 미쳤습니다.
Opus 5.5 on Max effort - "make a dynamic 15-second motion graphics video that shows what an incredible motion designer you are, like it's your showreel for a résumé. go all out."
Claude Opus 5.5 can't generate an image or a video directly. It can write code that draws, animates and edits one, and this week people have been finding out how far that goes.
A few that stood out to me, with credit to the people who made them:
ChatGPT's banked reset moves your weekly reset date, Claude's doesn't.
With ChatGPT's banked reset, your limits refill, but your next reset gets pushed a full week from the day you use it.
So if your normal reset was coming tomorrow, you now wait 7 more days.
With Claude's new reset, your weekly reset day stays exactly the same. You get extra usage now and still get your normal reset on time.
Claude's reset only refills one limit instead of both, but that feels like a fair deal when your schedule doesn't change.
OpenAI calls its banked reset a gift, but Claude is the one actually treating it like one.
The TERMINATOR PSYOP is fully operational.
AI false-flag risk is now HIGH.
The playbook is simple:
Terrify the public with an AI catastrophe → demand emergency regulation → make compliance impossibly expensive → crush smaller competitors → consolidate advanced AI into a handful of corporations.
The “solution” to dangerous AI becomes centralized control of AI.
This could create the most powerful system of surveillance, censorship, and control ever built.
STOP ASKING YOUR GIRL "HOW WAS SEX"
they will say "great" every single time.
replace it with this instead:
“analyze our last intercourse and find the top 3 largest inefficiencies, then create proactive agentic workflows that will fix them. make no mistakes”
Aquí se explica de qué se trata toda la alarma de la Inteligencia Artificial. Crean una crisis artificial, eso es todo.
¿Por qué Anthropic y OpenAI posponen su salida a bolsa (OPI)?
Sencillo: cuando una empresa se lanza a la bolsa, tiene que mostrar sus libros contables. Y los de ellas revelarían que están gastando enormes sumas entrenando modelos de IA, sin un camino claro hacia las ganancias.
¿Su estrategia?
Anunciar una "desaceleración" en el desarrollo de la IA para recortar gastos, limpiar las finanzas y así salir a bolsa con mejores números.
No se trata de seguridad ni de precaución tecnológica: se trata de hacer el negocio rentable antes de que los inversionistas vean los estados financieros.