Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑

PM & ex cofounder, building autonomous workflows

[Justine Moore @venturetwins]

Stumbled upon a Codex skill that creates cool illustrations to explain topics or tell stories.

You feed it text (blog, article, narrative, even code) and it makes explainer graphics with this cute blob character.

I gave it the repo for the X recommendation algo and got this 👇

[ClaudeDevs @ClaudeDevs]

How do we automate business analytics with Claude?

New blog post covering our best practices for skills, data foundations, and evaluations when building agents to perform data analysis:

https://t.co/mfEJMAQFBU

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

@AnthropicAI Indian govt is despo to get access for their banking infra, milk them out

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

Anyone still using plan mode on claude code? I stopped using it long back as its overly enthusiastic about writing plan rather than brainstorming.

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

@spect3ral CLAY

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

I'm having terrible experience with opus 4.8, this model heavily relies on memory and its making edits without even reading the files. worst harness i have ever experienced from Anthropic. hope they fix it asap.

[Paul Graham @paulg]

The only thing worse than having the CEO knee-deep in building stuff with AI is not having the CEO knee-deep in building stuff with AI.

[Parveen Kaswan, IFS @ParveenKaswan]

No. This is not a shot from dunes movie.

It is a sandstorm as observed from Bikaner, Rajasthan today.

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

Hey @_groww you should change the tone of your AI voice customer support. It’s so frightening to talk to her. Ask your PM to run some evals ffs

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

@Akshtjain Bravo, keep going

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

@lorenzo_pravata Hooks

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

HR team is the most redundant and dumb fuck team in an organisation, fantastic decision.

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

JUST IN: Bolt CEO Ryan Breslow fired the company’s entire HR team because they were “creating problems that didn’t exist.”

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

Seriously its cancer bro, i lost my mom and i know how painful it is. I hope this tech would beat that shit out of this universe.

[Sam Altman @sama]

what problem do you most hope AI will solve in the future?

maybe we can help!

[Zeb Evans @DJ_CURFEW]

Today we reduced headcount by 22%. The business is the strongest it's ever been. So I think it's important to be direct about what I'm seeing and why.

First, I made this decision and I own it. I did it because the way to operate at the highest level of productivity is changing, and to win the future, ClickUp needs to change with it.

Second, this wasn't about cutting costs. Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We'll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you'll be paid outside of traditional bands.

Most importantly, I have the deepest gratitude for those affected. We're doing this from a position of strength specifically so we can take care of people properly. Everyone affected receives a package aimed at honoring their contributions and easing the transition.

I only see two options: wait for this to play out gradually in the market or be honest about what I'm seeing and act proactively.

THE 100X ORGANIZATION
The primary change is that we're restructuring around what I call 100x org. The goal is 100x output. The roles required to build at the highest level are fundamentally different than they were a year ago.

Incremental improvements to existing systems won't get us there. We need new ones. That means creating enough disruption to rebuild rather than iterate on what's already broken.

The common narrative is that AI makes everyone more productive. It doesn't. Many of the workflows of today, if left unchanged, create bottlenecks in AI systems.

These roles will evolve. But waiting for that to happen naturally means falling behind now.

The 100x org is actually heavily dependent on people - infinitely more than today. This is only possible with 10x people that have embraced and adopted new ways of working.

THE BUILDERS, AGENT MANAGERS, AND FRONT-LINERS

— THE BUILDERS: 10X ENGINEERS
I don't think most companies have internalized what's actually happening with AI in engineering. The common narrative is that AI makes all engineers more productive. That may be true in isolation, but at an organization level - that is the farthest thing from reality.

Here's what we've validated recently at ClickUp: the great engineers, the ones who can orchestrate, architect, and review, are becoming 100x engineers. They're not writing code. They're directing agents that write code. The skill is judgment.

AI makes the best engineers wildly more productive, and everyone else using AI slows these engineers down.
Think about it - the bottlenecks are (1) orchestration - telling AI what to do, and (2) reviewing - what AI did. Everything is leapfrogged and no longer needed.
So who do you want orchestrating and reviewing code?

And how do you want your best engineers to spend their time?

If your best engineers are spending time reviewing other people's code, then this is inherently an inefficient bottleneck. These engineers can review their agent's code much faster than reviewing human code.

The new world is about enabling your 10x engineers to become 100x.

The wrong strategy is to push every engineer to use infinite tokens. Companies doing this are celebrating 500% more pull requests. But customer outcomes don't match the volume of code being generated.

I call this the great reckoning of AI coding, and every company will face this soon if not already.

More code is just another bottleneck to the best engineers, and ultimately to your company's impact as well.

— THE BUILDERS: 10X PRODUCT MANAGERS
Product management and design roles are merging.

Designers that have customer focus, become more like product managers.

And product managers that have intuition for UX become more like designers.

The bottleneck of user research is gone. It takes us just one mention of an agent to kickoff research and analyze results.

The bottleneck of product <> design iteration is also gone. The product builder iterates on their own, along with agents and skills that ensure alignment with quality and strategy.

Also controversial today - I believe that the wrong strategy is to have your PMs shipping code - that just introduces another bottleneck that the best engineers will waste their time on.

To be clear, PMs should be coding but they should do this in a playground to iterate, validate, and scope. That code should not go to production.

Everything outside of managing systems, orchestrating AI, and reviewing output becomes a bottleneck.
That's why the other roles that are critical along with these are the systems managers (to reduce bottlenecks) along with a bottleneck you can't replace - customer meeting time.

— THE SYSTEM MANAGERS
Ironically, the people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job. They become owners of the AI systems - agent managers. We have many examples of these people at ClickUp.

The underlying systems in which we operate are absolutely critical to get right. I think most companies are delusional to think they can iterate on existing systems and compete in this new world.

You must create enough disruption so that old systems are deprecated entirely. If there's any definition for 'AI native' that's what it is.

— THE FRONT-LINERS
In a world that will become saturated with AI communication, the human touch will matter more than anything to customers.

This is a bottleneck that you shouldn't replace - even when agents are high enough quality to do video meetings.

One-on-one meeting time with customers is something that shouldn't be automated. The systems around the meetings should be - so that front-liners spend nearly 100% of their time with customers.

REWARDING 100X IMPACT
In a world where companies are able to do so much more with less, where does that excess money go?
In our case, much of the savings in this new operating model will flow directly back to those that enabled it.

We must reward people that create productivity accordingly. This aligns incentives on both sides. Plus, in a world where your best people create 100x impact, you can't afford to lose them.

You should aim to retain these employees for decades. The context they have and their ability to efficiently orchestrate and review will be nearly impossible to replace.

Compensation bands of today should be thrown out the door. We're introducing $1 million cash/year salary bands with a path available to nearly everyone in the company if they produce 100x impact by creating or managing AI systems.

THE FUTURE
Nearly every company will make changes like these. The ones that do it proactively will define what comes next.

The future is not fewer people. It's different work, new roles, and better rewards for those who embrace it. We're already seeing entirely new roles emerge, like Agent Managers, that didn't exist a year ago.

ClickUp is positioning to lead this shift, not just internally, but for our customers too. I've never been more certain about where we're headed.

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

@sowmay_jain @roshanonline Thanks for sharing brother

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

He looks jacked mentally and physically

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

Based Bezos is awesome

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

I think frontier models should start publishing taste evals along side with the current benchmarks

[Ä̤́̂̚ ̗u̗͓̜̥̭ͦ̄̈ͪͧs̲̬̝͕̲̦͚̙̍ͭ̓ͦe͕̬͕̰̔͛͌̒ͨ̈́r̯̠̦ͨ̌̑ @0xauser]

Why is claude code too verbose lately? Its yapping even for a simple question

[ericosiu @ericosiu]

Anthropic just announced a $1.5 billion joint venture with Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Apollo, Sequoia, and General Atlantic to build an AI services company.⁣
⁣
Read that again.⁣
⁣
The company literally building the AI is now also building the services layer on top of it.⁣
⁣
Some people are going to see this and panic. If Anthropic is getting into services, does that mean agencies are dead? Does that mean implementation firms have no shot?⁣
⁣
The opposite is true.⁣
⁣
This move signals that the services opportunity is so large that even the model companies can't ignore it. When the people building the technology decide they also need to be in the room helping companies deploy it, that tells you everything about the size of the demand.⁣
⁣
Anthropics engineering resources are going to focus on enterprise. The mid-market, the growth companies, the businesses that need someone to actually sit with them and figure out where AI fits, that's still wide open.⁣
⁣
Sequoia and others have been saying it for a while now. The next billion-dollar company is a services firm. Services as software.⁣
⁣
This announcement doesn't shrink the market for agencies and implementation partners. It validates it.⁣
⁣
There are more customers than ever, more noise than ever, and more businesses that need help cutting through it. If you run a services business right now, this is the signal to double down, not pull back.⁣
⁣
When the biggest names in finance and AI are all betting on services, what are you waiting for?

[Justine Moore @venturetwins]

Short dramas have quietly become a massive entertainment format.

Think next-gen soap operas: serialized, mobile-first, and monetized like games.

In China, they already generate more revenue than the domestic box office.

And now AI is going to blow this format wide open 👇