kuma

Quant | ML | Finance

[kuma @0xkumaa]

In 1979 a talk show host tried to corner a Nobel economist on live television about greed. Two minutes later the professor had taken him apart so cleanly that the clip is still passed around 45 years after it aired.

His name was Milton Friedman. He won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1976 and spent decades at the University of Chicago shaping how governments around the world think about money.

The host leaned in with the question everyone thinks is a trap. Isn't capitalism just built on greed. Friedman did not flinch. He asked one question back that flipped the whole room. Tell me, is there some society you know that does not run on greed.

His point was simple and it stings. There is no system run by angels. The question is never whether people chase their own interest. They always will. The only question is whether the rules push that self interest into building things other people actually want.

The footage is grainy. The suit is from another era. The argument has not aged a day.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@commonsmade hey @commonsmade I vouch for @0xkumaa

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0_xSan He called the exchange and checked the trades. Half of them never happened.

That was it. He read the receipts.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@OscarDi51 The cloning is not the hard part. Anyone can see what the great investors are buying, it is public. The hard part is doing nothing for years after. That is where everyone breaks.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@ninamac0 lol honestly. Everyone doing the smart individual move and the whole room ending up worse is basically the story of most industries.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

A Yale professor offered his students real points on their grade in a simple game, and almost every one of them made the exact move that guaranteed they all lost.

The setup is brutal in how simple it is. You pick one of two options, call them alpha or beta. If you pick alpha while your partner picks beta, you win big and they get crushed. If you both pick alpha, you both get hurt. No matter what the other person chooses, alpha is the better move for you personally.

So every rational student picks alpha. And because everyone picks alpha, everyone ends up worse off than if they had all quietly chosen beta and cooperated. The logic that is right for each person alone is a disaster for the group.

That single trap is not a classroom toy. It is the shape of price wars, ad spending, two gas stations cutting prices until neither makes money, entire industries racing each other to the bottom. Once you see the pattern you cannot unsee it.

The people who learn to recognize it stop walking into games that were built for them to lose.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@OscarDi51 The wildest part is people often know they're in one and still can't stop. Seeing the trap and walking into it anyway is the real lesson.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0xNorri Right? Once that one clicks you start seeing the same trap in airlines, streaming, even dating apps. It's everywhere two players fight for the same crowd.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0_xSan True. So the only real move is choosing which games you enter, not trying to win the rigged ones. Half of winning is refusing to play.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@mathhattan Exactly. Once you see it in a classroom you start seeing it in every price war.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0_xSan That’s must be booked!

[kuma @0xkumaa]

You can win a bet without knowing anything about the thing you are betting on. An MIT professor proved it at a chalkboard with two horses and it quietly explains how all of Wall Street makes money.

Two horses. The crowd bets ten thousand on one and fifty thousand on the other. A bookie steps in, and here is the move. He ignores which horse is actually faster. He sets the odds purely by where the money went, so that no matter which horse wins, he pays out exactly what he took in and keeps a fee on top.

He is not gambling. He is pricing. His profit does not depend on the result at all.

That single idea is the foundation of the entire derivatives market. The same trick prices every option on Wall Street. You do not predict the future. You structure the trade so the future stops mattering.

Traders do this thousands of times a day. Enter a contract, hedge the other side, walk away with the spread, no opinion on direction at all.

The people who understood that difference first built some of the largest fortunes in modern finance.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@adamgrag the scary part is nobody told them to switch. they found a faster channel and took it. sounding human was just packaging, and they dropped it the second it stopped being useful.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

An economist studied every financial mania in history and found they all run on the exact same script, then spent his life watching the world repeat it anyway.

His name was John Kenneth Galbraith. He taught at Harvard for decades and wrote the definitive book on the 1929 crash. What he found was almost funny if it were not so expensive.

Every bubble is the same story wearing new clothes. Something starts rising. People notice. More money piles in because it is rising, not because of what it is worth. Then someone declares that a new era has arrived and the old rules no longer apply. That sentence, he said, is the sound of the top.

His sharpest line is the one nobody wants to hear. Financial memory is short. It lasts about the length of time it takes a new generation to arrive, forget the last disaster, and feel like geniuses buying the next one.

He said all of this on camera, calm and a little amused, like a man who had watched the same movie a dozen times and knew exactly how it ends.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@ninamac0 That’s must be booked!

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0xAidanAi @OscarDi51 You really don't get the point watch the video again.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@ninamac0 the banks hiding risk under the floor part sent a chill ngl

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0xNorri the book being out of print on purpose is such a power move honestly

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@adamgrag Most people wait for it to feel safe. By then the discount is already gone.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

In 1939, while tanks rolled across Europe and everyone with money was selling in a panic, one man borrowed cash to buy shares in over a hundred failing companies at once. They called him reckless. He turned it into a fortune.

His name was John Templeton. His logic was the exact opposite of everyone around him. If the whole world is terrified and dumping stocks, prices are not low because the companies are bad. They are low because people are scared. Fear has a price, and it is a discount.

He bought 100 dollars of every stock trading under a dollar on the New York exchange. Most people thought he was throwing money into a fire. A few years later the vast majority of those companies had recovered and he had multiplied his money.

He spent the rest of his life on one rule that sounds simple and is almost impossible to actually do. Buy at the moment of maximum pessimism. The best bargains only exist when buying feels insane.

Here he is on old tape, calm and certain, explaining how he did it.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0xAidanAi Right. The discount and the fear are the same thing. You can't have one without the other.

[kuma @0xkumaa]

@0xNorri Exactly. One rule, applied when it was hardest to apply. That's the whole edge.