@thsottiaux Would love a simple one-click way to import local skills to cloud skills, from both "~/.agents/skills" and "~/.codex/skills".
And even better, an easy way to keep local and cloud skills updated or in sync.
A few thoughts for the community:
1. We’ve heard your feedback loud and clear, and we fully acknowledge it. This milestone is a a vital and important one, but the way it was communicated didn’t do justice to the MvX and xMoney community. That’s on us, and it will be processed and addressed.
2. To properly gather and process your most important questions and feedback, we’ve put together this form:
https://t.co/xlNO6qG55K
3. Tomorrow, myself and Lucian, will host a Spaces or podcast to go through the main feedback points from the MvX perspective, but also share the bigger picture, the strategy behind this move, and why it carries immense value for the MvX ecosystem.
4. At the same time, Greg and the xMoney team is going through all feedback and has already scheduled a dedicated space to dive deeper, address concerns, and share the full context and vision for the steps ahead.
We’re here, in the trenches, listening, learning, and processing.
And together, we’ll move this in the right direction.
There’s no other way.
First, thank you for the trust 🙏
Second, I do not work at xMoney directly, so I have limited insight. Take this as an unhinged opinion piece, and nothing more.
Web3 is a paradoxical space: on one hand you have cypherpunks, communities, decentralisation, ideology, etc. On the other hand you have the big fish, VCs, ETFs, institutions, all that. They pull in different directions.
The space is dominated by the big fish nowadays, and the most successful projects are the ones who took the fat VC money and threw it around in partnerships and "marketing" liberally. We're talking millions. I kinda hate that, but it is what it is.
MultiversX started with a small investment, a lot of the founders' personal savings, a cypherpunk spirit, and an amazing tech team, willing to work their asses off for comparatively peanuts. That is still our superpower, when it comes to tech. We can ship top tech, cheaper and faster than anyone else.
BUT! The main challenge with xMoney isn't technical. If it was technical, we would long have had it all sorted out. The challenge is legal, and with regulation. You can't tech your way through this one. You need patience, legal teams, and investments. This is the non-IT world, where things are still slow and expensive.
And if you get investments, you need to give something to investors. Retail alone can't fund this (I think). The upside is, if money starts flowing in, everyone should be better off in the end, dilution or not. "Grow the pie", right? The product is really valuable, once it starts really shining, xMoney will become a top player in the space, and the community/holders will benefit as well. And more importantly, actual revenue will start flowing in, something very rare nowadays.
It's a bold move, but I don't think there is a safer route. People need to understand that now is the time to get payments and governments on board, no matter the cost. In a few years it will be too late.
And the fact that XMN is launched on Sui first is irrelevant for the average user. It's going to end up everywhere anyway. The future is multi-chain. The best tech shall win in the end, but the regular user won't care. While we debate blockchain vs. blockchain, adoption is still far far from where it should.
So keep building, focus on tbe essential, keep the faith, godspeed.
Remember we're all just as invested as you guys. I, for one, am way less diversified than I should 😅 I'm all in on EGLD, there is no plan B. If you lose, we lose. If we win, you win as well. There is a plan, there is a process. When feeling discouraged, remember that we'll be fighting to the end no matter what. That I can promise you.
Here's how you make the $UTK to $XMN deal fair. Use the same supply for XMN and once you freeze UTK the opening XMN value should match the frozen UTK value.
No dilution, no locking period nonsense. Transition the token on SUI, let UTK holders get their value 1:1 without any dilution. Allow new users to come in on the new platform at par with existing holders.
If the team believes in what comes next- this is the way to do it. What I can't support is a blatant attempt to let your existing holders who funded the platform in the first place take all the risk again. Sorry- this nonsense needs to stop.
@beniaminmincu Hello Beniamin,
1. Why isn’t the new token available on MultiversX at launch?
2. Why does this feel like a one-way deal? MultiversX users bear dilution and must move to Sui for $XMN, while new Sui users have all the benefits.
Action is needed to keep the community engaged ⚡
@AndrewDTBR $EGLD: #9 ATH ROI among projects with >$100M MC (833.83x)
Current ROI: 26.88x still strong. (#28) Outperformed:
ONDO (19.27x)
DOT (15.51x)
FET (9.25x)
NEAR (7.5x)
HBAR (2.29x)
SEI (1.45x)
Source: Cryptorank. io