It seems to me that before "urgently figuring out how to control AI systems much smarter than us" we need to have the beginning of a hint of a design for a system smarter than a house cat.
Such a sense of urgency reveals an extremely distorted view of reality.
No wonder the more based members of the organization seeked to marginalize the superalignment group.
It's as if someone had said in 1925 "we urgently need to figure out how to control aircrafts that can transport hundreds of passengers at near the speed of the sound over the oceans."
It would have been difficult to make long-haul passenger jets safe before the turbojet was invented and before any aircraft had crossed the atlantic non-stop.
Yet, we can now fly halfway around the world on twin-engine jets in complete safety.
It didn't require some sort of magical recipe for safety.
It took decades of careful engineering and iterative refinements.
The process will be similar for intelligent systems.
It will take years for them to get as smart as cats, and more years to get as smart as humans, let alone smarter (don't confuse the superhuman knowledge accumulation and retrieval abilities of current LLMs with actual intelligence).
It will take years for them to be deployed and fine-tuned for efficiency and safety as they are made smarter and smarter.
Why Jan Leike resigned from OpenAI:
- Disagrees with OpenAI leadership
- Should focus on future model preparation/safety
- Not on right trajectory
- Team has struggled for resources
- Safety culture and processes been deprioritized
- OpenAI must become a safety-first AGI company
Obsidian 1.1 is now available to insiders โจ
The new Canvas view allows you to organize notes visually โ an infinite space to brainstorm, diagram and lay out your ideas
Works great for mind maps, flow charts, org charts, moodboards, family trees. You can even embed web pages ๐