@stefnox @BastienFachan Federer almost has the same record because in 2006 he was taken to a 3rd set in IW & MI before the final, but won the best-of-5 final in 3 straight sets; so does the extra set won make up for not winning the whole thing in straights? ๐ฅด
@RazOlsRF Add says that no games, not sets, just tiebreaks.
But all of tennis is a tiebreak reallyโฆ
Games = tiebreak to 4, then win by two (15,30,40,game = 1,2,3,4)
Sets = tiebreak to 6 tiebreaks, then win by two tiebreaks.
Matches = tiebreak to 2 or 3 sets of tiebreaks of tiebreaks.
@MythAcer400@Big3Tennis 2009 was not Federerโs best level on clay, despite it being his only title year.
2011 form was better, and probably 2006 & 2007 too. Just Rafa was in the way those years.
BREAKING:
Roger Federer will be inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame in 2026.
๐น20 Grand Slam titles
๐น103 career titles
๐นWorld No. 1 for 310 weeks (237 consecutive weeks, longest streak in ATP & WTA history)
๐น28 Masters 1000 titles
๐น6 ATP Finals titles
๐นOlympic Gold Medal in doubles 2008
๐นOlympic Silver Medal in singles 2012
Living Legend.
๐จ๐ญโค๏ธ
@ismail_gul45637@camerlengo73_2 It also would have be a 6th consecutive US Open!!
No one else in the Open era has won 6 at all, let alone in a row.
No one has defended the US Open since Federer last did it in 2008!!
Few things to note with this comparison:
* Federer ~35 in this clip; Nadal closer to 30. Nadal has always been a shape and spin player, but Federer in the early-mid 20s was more than capable of faster ground strokes.
* Fedal are both ensuring net clearance here, which means the power goes into spin and shape rather than flatter point to point speed.
* Federer is on the baseline taking so many balls on the rise to quickly redirect the ball and take time from Nadal. This tactic is just as effective at taking time away as it is to make the ball arrive faster. Itโs comparably hard to play like this.
* sadly we donโt ever see it, but it would be have been a great contrast of styles to see younger Fedal (and Djokovic!) take on Alcaraz or Sinner today.
1972 โ love the classic American sports colour combo, but otherwise looks so dated now. Nice bit of retro art
1990 โ love the disco colours, but otherwise bland
2001 โ iconic Sampras pose, would love to see this one in the 1972 colour scheme
2009 โ quite bland
2018 โ personal favourite, injects some pace and power into the image.
2025 โ clean, stylish, but why drop the cool embedded player of the 2018 logo? Could
have just dropped the โtourโ bit to keep it a bit more minimalist. I wonder how it would look with a tennis ball in the hole of the P
This sample schedule for 2025 meets the tour criteria for top30 players & includes 28/52 weeks off (not counting additional days when not winning tournaments)
@jackdraper0 schedule pretty much followed this (just swap Dallas/Rotterdam for Doha).
What do you think should be changed?
From Wimbledon onward itโs look more sensible, with 2 weeks on, 2 off until the end where there is a big block before the Australian Open.
If they removed 1xMasters1000 and 1x500 from minimum requirements, and moved Madrid back a week (just after Monte-Carlo which would likely be the one to get skipped) then youโd have 2 on 2 off from Miami onwards.
@wey_know@JustTennis123 Tsitsipas and Dimitrov both played great tennis that year (2019 AO & USO respectively).
The Dimitrov match in particular is an excellent highlights match to rewatch. itโs on YouTube at full length and condensed as well.
@Not_markl@DocBorelli@asud683385 Letโs not hate on Bye, the poor thing keeps on trying week in week out, in both the menโs and womenโs events, and even enters multiple times. What an inspiration to never give up.
@TheTennisLetter Itโs a free market out there.
There is a lot more business going on with the ATP and ITF then there is with whatever (relatively) little team runs the six kings once a year for only 6 players.