et cetera

[et cetera @159gb]

@aijia96 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Then we’re probably closer than you think. I’ve never argued they aren’t a burden.

[et cetera @159gb]

@aijia96 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT A person can be a tremendous burden and still have value. Those aren’t mutually exclusive.

[et cetera @159gb]

@aijia96 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Even if I never helped a disabled person in my life, that wouldn’t answer the question.

[et cetera @159gb]

@Adriana19Flower Rachel Wilson, who Richard Spencer was invoking.

[et cetera @159gb]

@ShmoJohn19724 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT You’ve now responded multiple times with arguments about the burden on others.
I’m asking a simpler question:

Does the disability itself make the person’s life less valuable?

If you dodge again, I’ll assume you don’t want to answer and leave it there.

[et cetera @159gb]

@ShmoJohn19724 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Notice how every reply changes the subject from the value of the disabled person to the burden on everyone else.

Does the disability itself make their life less valuable?

[et cetera @159gb]

@ShmoJohn19724 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Not choosing the outcome doesn’t answer the question.

Does the disabled person have less value because of their disability?

[et cetera @159gb]

@ShmoJohn19724 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT You’re talking about whether you’d choose the outcome.

I’m talking about whether the person who exists as a result has less value because of their disability.

Those are two different questions.

[et cetera @159gb]

@NicholasCTait @LetsbeFrankokay @KeithWoodsYT Everyone loves a “usefulness determines value” ethic until they’re the one who becomes old, sick, dependent, or disabled.

[et cetera @159gb]

@LetsbeFrankokay @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Then we disagree on first principles.

I don’t believe a person’s value is determined by cost, dependency, or usefulness.

[et cetera @159gb]

@LetsbeFrankokay @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT You’re still avoiding the question.

Does a severe disability negate the value of a person’s life, yes or no?

[et cetera @159gb]

@LetsbeFrankokay @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Notice how you never answered whether the child’s life still has value.

You immediately switch to cost, burden, and logistics.

[et cetera @159gb]

@jumpingguy7 @NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT “Fully conscious” and “meaningful capacity” are undefined categories.

The sister in the example isn’t brain dead, she’s profoundly disabled. You’re quietly changing the discussion from disability to something closer to a vegetative state.

[et cetera @159gb]

@NicholasCTait @KeithWoodsYT Yes, it is a terrible affliction. But this can happen at any point in life.

If your child falls, hits their head, becomes disabled in the same way. Does this negate the value of their life?

[et cetera @159gb]

@jpeasy73 @KeithWoodsYT @TheRWCoalition https://t.co/TkbRQN48mR

[Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon]

Here is the agreement. Neo pagan and wierdo accounts are attacking me (Which is usual) but here they have no leg to stand on. If you want me to broadcast our debates to a large audience on YT then you have to follow TOS. If not then ask for rumble. Then you can sperg all you want and nobody cares.

[et cetera @159gb]

@TheRWCoalition @KeithWoodsYT "Giving equal amounts of time to both parties is rigging the system!"

[et cetera @159gb]

@groyperkutty @ImperiumFirst "I disagree that the opening statement should be 10 minutes long"

"Oh yeah? Your kid dying is your fault"

Are you retarded?

[et cetera @159gb]

@86rothbard @DissidentFrau Bro why didn't Andrew just let him say faggot nigger and nuke his Youtube channel?

What a PUSSY!