Very happy to share that my paper, "Spinoza's Expansive Necessitarianism," has been published open access in the British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Turns out when you have a wild metaphysics, as Spinoza does, you also get a pretty wild ontology.
@Lasermazer On David Lewis, I think not, since he wants to use "actual" as an indexical to pick out regions of possibility space (in a sense). I have another paper hopefully coming out soon that touches on that. On laws of nature, no, since on my reading of Spinoza, laws are universal.
I'm happy to share (on Anne Conway's 394th birthday, by coincidence) that my paper, "Priority Monism in Anne Conway: Mediation through the Whole," has been published in the Journal of Modern Philosophy
https://t.co/szZSYH2fCL
If you're interested in (i) what Spinoza thought about the (non-existent, but representationally informative) "bottom" of the mereological ladder or (ii) some subtle mistakes in a couple of famous 20th-century French interpretations of Spinoza, give the paper a glance!
Happy to share that my paper, "Spinoza's Simplest Bodies" has been published open access in Philosophy. Very grateful to @asalgadoborge and @alexxdouglas for extremely helpful comments!
https://t.co/XyJ9lRETD0
That's my cue. Gonna go ahead and start tweeting about Star Wars and 17th-century metaphysics for 4 likes in a new venue. If that's your jam, find me at https://t.co/BOoJNFIkls
After spending the past four years closely dissecting certain features of Cartesian physics, today I have arrived at the tentative conclusion that Descartes *may* have gotten a few things very badly wrong.