Would have been president. He had the aura, the charisma, and policy knowledge to easily win. He would've arguably been the most effective right wing President in history had he survived September 10th, and that's why our enemies cheered when he was killed.
@YankeesFiles I am not pushing for a TB style of play. But when Home runs are the sole priority of the offense, you strikeout more. Yes the Dodgers Homer but they also hit for average and put the ball in play/move the runner over. You don’t win a game on one swing, let alone a series.
@YankeesFiles When you get to October and it’s time to face a fundamental team who can also match your fire power, it becomes frustrating to watch because it’s like watching the same nightmare every year. The Yankees blueprint of home run or strikeout has been their demise every year. (2/2)
@YankeesFiles Both sides of the argument are unfair. If we’re honest, the Yankees have benefited from the AL being the weakest it’s been in YEARS. They always have solid teams but each of those teams have glaring holes in them that they ultimately get exposed for in October. (1/2)
CNN: “This is an undocumented immigrant...”
Stephen Miller: “They were here ILLEGALLY?”
CNN: “I want this to be a good-faith discussion...”
Miller: “When you use language designed to obscure the truth, that’s NOT good faith. An ILLEGAL ALIEN is an ILLEGAL ALIEN. They’re not ‘undocumented immigrants’.”
CNN: “Stephen, we’re trying to humanize the debate...”
Miller: “Humanize? Then let’s humanize the Penal Code too. The bank robber becomes a ‘specialist in unscheduled withdrawals’. The con artist turns into an ‘entrepreneur of alternative financial narratives’. The guy who breaks into your house uninvited is just a ‘visitor with pending documentation’. How about that?”
CNN: “That’s a crude analogy.”
Miller: “Crude is pretending federal law vanishes because CNN’s copy desk cooked up a cuddlier euphemism. ‘Undocumented’ sounds like someone who forgot their wallet in an Uber. No. It’s someone who crossed the border without authorization, stayed, and now the press treats the legal statute like it’s a matter of writing style.”
CNN: “But many contribute to the economy...”
Miller: “Ah, the classic argument: crime stops being crime if the person washes dishes or builds roofs. By the same token, the cigarette smuggler ‘contributes’ too, creates jobs in transport. Want us to call him an ‘informal logistics entrepreneur’? Would CNN go for that?”
CNN: “You’re polarizing.”
Miller: “No. I’m rejecting the marketing dictionary. You change the word, then accuse anyone who uses the legal term of being ‘inhumane’. It’s the oldest trick in the book: first soften the vocabulary, then declare moral victory. The United States is tired of this theater. Call it what it is. Or admit the goal was never clarity—it was narrative control.”
Are we actually living through the most chaotic era in human history, or are we just the first generation with social media forced to watch every tragedy on earth unfold in real time, and the world has always been this dark, we were just never close enough to see it?