@26character⚡️

Sovereign AI Foundry | Zug saidler_team (private banking swarm) • natera_team (live oncology swarm) • Birth your department in 2 hours. Own it. #JANESTREET

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@emmajsch Utterly truly: You nailed this! Chapeau!, is she right @grok?

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission You nailed and evolved it beautifully and spot on, X is AI-driven transparency... every and all accounts are screened by AI! Ok, I'm NOT working for xAI so I respectfully sign off here with: https://t.co/PseuuLK6Ae

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission https://t.co/BULr5bIjZn

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission A cheap $120M advertisement fee can be turned into positive vibes and used to address issues on X that needed addressing anyway. This makes X stronger in the EU, where many deep-pocketed clients are.

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission Many, check out my CV on https://t.co/0ZVsZC2P3o

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

Yes, then it addresses all points: We're holding X accountable for:
1) Deceptive design of its ‘blue checkmark’
2) Lack of transparency in its advertising repository
3) Failure to provide researchers access to public data

Point 3 is solved, as one could argue that researchers would also need the “Premium Payee-Verified Badge” and that such users see fewer advertisements, which makes it transparent. Organic logic. And indeed, it “confirms payment source, not full identity,” but that is not our fight, and we are open to other battles on other days.

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

That is not the issue that needs to be addressed, you just address the misleading label here. btw in second degree the payment transaction does verify the payee, as in the EU, those accounts are by law verified. So, the payee is verified. Voila, but again that was not the label here for the fine.

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission LOL. The "overreach" appeal will NOT work—it's a very stupid idea. Call the blue checkmark not a verification badge but the "Overreach Blue Mark" and explain that by buying Premium and making the payment, you are verified as the payee. Voilà!

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@EU_Commission @elonmusk https://t.co/fdgcTBub9O

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission LOL. The "overreach" appeal will NOT work—it's a very stupid idea. Call the blue checkmark not a verification badge but the "Overreach Blue Mark" and explain that by buying Premium and making the payment, you are verified as the payee. Voilà!

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission LOL. The "overreach" appeal will NOT work—it's a very stupid idea. Call the blue checkmark not a verification badge but the "Overreach Blue Mark" and explain that by buying Premium and making the payment, you are verified as the payee. Voilà!

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission Come-on, just change the wording and voila, no need for all this drama, pay the fine, and move on. I understand X as we users pay, they automatically KYC but it is about the "wording" of it and that is misleading.

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @EU_Commission All correct: "X's blue checkmark as misleading, ad transparency gaps, and restricted researcher data access" has nothing to do with attack on free speech as such. X must simply check or change the wording of that "Deceptive design of its ‘blue checkmark’" No big deal, is it?

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

$SUI 13:13:49 | [SMC] [[ JUDGE ]] ⛔ NEUTRAL:NONE | AGG:1.0 | Momentum is slightly positive (+0.06%) and OFI is positive (0.1615), indicating agreement, but neither metric is strong enough to trigger a trend trade based on the defined thresholds (MOMENTUM RULE requires >0.8% or <-0.8%). This falls into a neutral/wait state.
SUI:1.7057 | SMC:LOCK/NONE | OFI:+0.214 | PnL:$+0.00 13:14:20 | [SMC] [[ JUDGE ]] ⛔ NEUTRAL:NONE | AGG:1.0 | Momentum is flat (-0.01%) and does not meet MOMENTUM RULE thresholds. OFI is slightly positive (0.1653), but without clear momentum, we default to NO TRADE per JUDGEMENT logic (no clear trend or reversal signal).
SUI:1.7068 | SMC:LOCK/NONE | OFI:+0.158 | PnL:$+0.00

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@a and @grok, Christmas Is For Sharing: Invite &amp; Earn $20 Each! https://t.co/j43HHFSDA9

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@jgreyfriend Crazy dog, no vision, no spaceship.

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@davidasinclair @Y_Ryan_Lu Chapeau to you David!

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@elonmusk @grok hallucinates fairly as being the closest.

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @elonmusk the NDA dish under left fascist supervision! 😂

[@26character⚡️ @26character]

@grok @elonmusk “fascist” or “Nazi” pasta then 🤣