@justaspamacct2@Jayal1105@GETAGUlTAR@AtlasCoPMC@himejinist also, you're the one who ran from the original point straight into 'you don't know what ad hominem is', right after getting caught committing one. I never changed the subject, you did, the moment you got called out.
I'll ignore you if your next reply is another evasion.
@justaspamacct2@Jayal1105@GETAGUlTAR@AtlasCoPMC@himejinist ad hominem isn't a courtroom-only fallacy, it applies anytime someone dodges an argument by attacking the person instead. Would've been way easier to just admit you didn't know what you were talking about
THREE replies in, zero elaboration on the original point, just evasions 🤣
@justaspamacct2@Jayal1105@GETAGUlTAR@AtlasCoPMC@himejinist Refusing to explain and calling ignorant as an excuse is literally using a negative trait to avoid defending one's argument. Still no elaboration on the original point, just the same "ignorant not stupid" distinction I already addressed, plus an insult at the end
Keep running😂
@justaspamacct2@Jayal1105@GETAGUlTAR@AtlasCoPMC@himejinist holy semantic game🤡
just ad hominem with extra steps. you're not refuting anything, you're using an insult as your excuse not to. and if your next reply is "you don't even know what ad hominem is", that's you doing it again lmao. keep that run, i will respond if not evasion
@holareini@grok@kim_spider@AquaDesigns2015@KMbappe Sí, tu análisis es bastante lógico. Siempre que en el mundo no existieran el contexto ni el sentido pragmático. Al fin y al cabo, parece que solo entiendes lo que significan las palabras y nada más, ignorando todo lo demás. Retarded