Bob Griffin

Sound Money Evangelist #bitcoin Not Financial Advice! Views are my Own.

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

Celebrating Charlie Kirk today! Jesus is alive in this house! WOW!

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@parman_the @BigSeanHarris Nope!

[Adam Back @adam3us]

On the filter fork topic.

I don't usually have time, but this morning listened to one of the twitter spaces from earlier in the week, with some well meaning relative bitcoin newcomers, that humanized them, and their concerns and thoughts for why they thought that made it logical to support 110.

My feeling after listening, is if these are the people with #110 in their handles, I'm sad to see them about to fork off and get disillusioned without understanding why bitcoin rejected 110 robustly.

So here's a more empathetic, constructive higher level version of explaining why not. I hope it's high-level and first-principles enough that everyone can follow.

They seem to want to understand what makes people tick, and are suspicious of intent. So, if someone asked me why is Bitcoin important and what is it, I'd say my (personal) mission and hope for bitcoin is to build the cypherpunk future, that "Snow Crash" was a blueprint, and work backwards from there. Bitcoin I hope leads to fully free markets via bearer unseizable, hard mathematically dependable money. Not everyone is comfortable with that level of freedom, but that's my view. And at this point, I believe that surprisingly, even now many governments have come to understand and value bitcoin's gold-like mathematical assurance, a positive development. Others may have milder views than myself, but still like hard censorship resistant money.

Because of motive suspicion, if it's not obvious: I hate spam with a passion, that's how I came to design hashcash while researching decentralized bearer money with others, and running nodes in privacy related cypherpunk p2p networks nearly three decades ago.

People seem upset about the default op return policy change in bitcoin. I will just assert, there are extremely robust and simple reasons for bitcoin changing default relay policy, and most just didn't do their research, so don't know what those are, or maybe not technical enough to fully understand though there have been 1000s of posts trying to explain in various simplified ways. So that lack of understanding lends itself to shared build-up of false narratives. So here's my back-to-basics higher level explanation.

The decentralization needed to create cypherpunk money has implications a: side effect of decentralization is that you can't impose your views on others. The very decentralization mechanism that helps that, is working against what BIP 110 wants, which at it's most basic is a quest to police other people. I understand supporters don't see their intent like that, but introspect deeper.

You can modify your software, but not anyone else's. Another critical and incredibly robust technical bitcoin immune system is bitcoin can't have people who don't understand technology basics insist on eroding security, decentralization robustness and core properties. That would end badly, fast, and so people will fight you on that.

So the message is Bitcoin respectfully says "no" to what you want. Sorry, and bitcoiners do genuinely understand and empathize that you mean well, have high level thoughts that make emotional sense, and articulate sensible bitcoin-defensive high level ideas, but they are not grounded and without you seeing it, the way you propose to achieve your ideas, hard-conflict with free cypherpunk permissionless money.

My advice is to listen to more experienced people who understand the system and why it works the way it does, to whatever detail you want to understand the grounded reasons for why this is the implication of decentralization and cypherpunk money.

I guarantee you the developer and protocol ecosystem shares and exceeds your views on bearer hard money (and dislike of spam). You may not agree with individual developers choices, views, way of expressing themselves etc, BUT you also need to understand the IETF-like decentralized technical consensus process creates a protective change resistance, that is highly effective at protecting bitcoin mission. The implication of which is no developer can change anything without technical consensus from hundreds of other developers and protocol observers who are pedantic and extremely knowledgeable clever people who won't let any unaddressed technical question past. The protective change resistance is robust and decentralized in an amplifying way because of this technical consensus.

And the many highly technical mainline developers' cypherpunk mission mindsets are probably far more determined than you can even handle on clarity of understanding and views about freedoms on permissionless networks, as many of you are probably still subconsciously inured by the matrix, where they have transcended that, and grew up immersed in it decades ago. They think natively in this space, while you are just grappling with the surface. Many wont have internalized or have the experience to know how this internet physics works, where there is no policeman, no policy authority, just mathematics, free market and hard money. That has implications for your views also, unfortunately.

Now the tough pill, which is unfortunately true: If you won't listen to reason, educate yourself, learn, the same radical freedom applies to you: your permissionless recourse is to club together and create a fork. But bitcoin won't be joining it. (With respect and no sleight intended.)

Please rejoin bitcoin now, or later if you're not convinced and need to experience 110 forking off and fizzling for yourself to start that journey of introspecting and learning. It would be sad if bitcoin lost people disillusioned due to simple lack of understanding of what's going on there, we're all trying to defend bitcoin and keep it on mission. Including btw the 110 technical promoters, just they wandered off plot somehow.

Join the cypherpunks on bitcoin, come cypherpunk summer🌞 in a few weeks.

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@nature_viewss B

[Craig Raw 🐦 @craigraw]

My attempt to protect users from scam apps on the @AppStore has gotten my Apple Developer account flagged for termination - ironically, for "dishonest activity".

Unless it's reversed by June 30, all new installs of Sparrow Wallet will fail, and development on macOS will end.

The context: since 2023, more than a dozen fake "Sparrow" apps have appeared on the App Store, as recently as April this year. Users have contacted me after losing their savings, in some cases their life savings, to these impersonators.

I'm the developer of the real Sparrow Wallet, a desktop app, and I hold the registered US trademarks for the name and logo. I have publicly warned @Apple and the community about these fake apps from early 2024, but they keep appearing.

The app @Apple flagged was a placeholder that was never published. Its only purpose was to warn users that Sparrow is desktop-only and that other "Sparrow" apps aren't mine. This approach may have been misguided, but there was nothing dishonest about it.

I'm confident this is an automated misclassification that Apple would reverse on review - but I may be terminated before a human ever looks at my appeal. The cost would fall on @Apple's own users: blocked installs and no updates for a tool people rely on, which opens the door for more fakes.

If you value Sparrow, a repost would help. @AppleSupport

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@Jacobtheclipper Now make it a red card! That will really stop it!

[Bill Ackman @BillAckman]

.@BernieSanders , it is a time to celebrate. @elonmusk has created enormous value for society by building @SpaceX, driving down the cost of rocket launches and creating a global satellite communication network that has brought high speed, low-cost internet and communication access to hundreds of millions and eventually billions of people along with critical advantages for our military and our nation’s defense.

SpaceX and its technologies will cause an acceleration in the growth of wages and wealth creation globally, including in some of the poorest communities in the U.S. and around the world.

Access to low-cost, high speed communications everywhere will allow children around the world to be educated, families to build businesses, and life-saving medical knowledge and care to be available everywhere.

SpaceX will materially bring down the cost of compute, advancing AI and humanity.

Meanwhile, 4,000 SpaceX employees yesterday became millionaires, including hourly wage employees who you claim you are trying to help.

The Elon Musks of the world drive growth, global GDP, and provide access to goods and services at lower cost that would otherwise not exist.

Elon’s nominal trillionaire status is due to his ownership of SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, the Boring Company and his other initiatives that have brought new technologies that improve our everyday lives.

Elon is not sitting on a trillion dollar pile of cash, jewelry and gold. He is using his controlling stakes in his companies to advance mankind. Elon’s companies don’t pay dividends. They reinvest all of their capital to accelerate innovation and value creation.

Elon is working 24/7 for all of us. He deserves respect and appreciation, not smears.

Bernie, your socialism would never allow a SpaceX to be built. Socialism has only proven to impoverish mankind and lead to death and destruction.

We need to create the conditions for more SpaceXs to be built, not attack the great entrepreneurs who are helping to advance our country.

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@CoachGilly6 At least FIFA is doing something about it now! Should be an automatic red - that would really put a stop to this nonsense!

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

Excellent interview by @natbrunell It’s so refreshing to hear MS (Amy) speak frankly and honestly about bitcoin and the pros and cons of centralized vs decentralized ownership and exposure! Both paths should probably coexist in a well structured AA + custody architecture.

[Natalie Brunell ⚡️ @natbrunell]

What does Wall Street actually see in Bitcoin? I sat down with someone leading the charge from the inside.

Amy Oldenburg runs digital asset strategy at Morgan Stanley. We talk about how much Bitcoin should be in a portfolio, the success of $MSBT, why the price of bitcoin has been stuck and what could finally move it.

Full conversation streaming now!

TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Tech Roots: From the 1999 Tech Bubble to Emerging Markets
8:26 Why Bitcoin Made Sense Early On
14:17 Morgan Stanley's Spot Bitcoin ETF
16:43 Why Aren't Institutions All-In On Bitcoin?
19:18 Record Demand for MSBT
21:21 Would Morgan Stanley Ever Issue Digital Credit?
23:42 The Advisor Gap: Why Isn’t Everyone Recommending Bitcoin?
28:37 What's Holding Bitcoin Back?
34:19 Corporate Balance Sheets
36:22 Bitcoin's Future
38:05 What Should More People Understand About Bitcoin?
39:15 Winner-Take-All Tech vs. Redundant Finance: The Industry's Future
45:32 Addressing Big Bank Skepticism

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@Rothmus Wow! Not a good look!

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@olyveyaa $15 wins every time

[Graham Allen @GrahamAllen]

TPUSA took over 22% of NFL viewership away! They changed history! They showed the world that an alternative can change everything!

CHARLIE WOULD BE SOO PROUD❤️🇺🇸

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@ShawnRyan762 Thank you Shawn.

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@GuntherEagleman SS - it’s in the jeans!

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@Matt_Pinner 0 points…hah

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@jackmallers @TuckerCarlson Hey @jackmallers maybe you can get a one on one with him and educate!

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@its_The_Dr Phish

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@WatchMarquee Too bad they didn’t use any of that money at the trade deadline!

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@Matt_Pinner

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@Chicago_NFL C

[Bob Griffin @2bobbyg]

@AVGirl4Life Water