@CatuzoP@Abdulofkwara@Fosas69 Read to understand your fallacy, why not share the exact message from the Quran.
I don’t follow the blind, I always prefer to follow the pathway on my own.
GRAPHICS WARNING: Let's assume without conceding that I could be over the board on my thoughts, but what if it requires that level of critical thinking to unravel these daredevils?
What if the guy arrested in Osun forest was the same one in the beheading video judging from the tracksuit he worn ?
Just what if ?
@Hameed_360 There was no Islam or Quran before Mohammed so Adam has no religion.
Go and translate your Quran to your language so you will understand what you are reading.
@Abdulofkwara@Fosas69 Also, state three verses in Quran that pray for a person or people.
Also 3 verses that state that God is love and He love his people, and Muslims should love their neighbor
@Abdulofkwara@Fosas69 Unfortunately you failed to state why the Quran said, you are only gave your own interpretation.
Could you state what the Quran stated exactly in those verses.
@KamVTV Just ask yourself the worth of your life? If it worth more than money then you should know the Ukrainians died fighting to support US in Iraq & Afghanistan.
But if your life has no value you can continue disputing why the US still give money to Ukraine to fight Putin.
Since the introduction of Shariah law in Nigeria on October 1999, in Zamfara northern Nigeria, the state Zamfara and northern Nigeria have not known peace and that was what brought terrorists & bandits bcos they are following Sharia law to kill, maim and destroy life.
Sharia law has been present in every state in Nigeria since the arrival of Islam. You cannot be a Muslim without following it; Sharia law is central to Islam, so there is no point in trying to stop it. Every Muslim practices it daily.
The next Muslim governor in Oyo state will be implementing shariah.. People should be prepared for it, if you don’t like Yoruba culture and Nigeria law, then relocate to Afghanistan, Syria, or Yemen to be their governor. @OfficialAPCNg
Putting the Question of Sharīʿah in Yorùbá Land in Proper Perspective
Much of the controversy surrounding Sharīʿah in Yorùbá land is driven more by fear, misinformation and politics than by a proper understanding of what is actually being requested by Muslims.
The first point that must be clearly stated is that a full-fledged Sharīʿah legal system, in the sense of a comprehensive state-wide Islamic legal order governing criminal, civil and public affairs, is neither practical nor presently attainable in the multicultural and multi-religious context of Yorùbá land. The demographic realities, constitutional framework and religious diversity of the Southwest make such a project unrealistic.
Indeed, the overwhelming majority of Muslims advocating for Sharīʿah are not calling for the establishment of an Islamic state, nor are they demanding the replacement of existing constitutional structures with a comprehensive Islamic legal system.
What many Muslims have consistently requested is something far more limited, reasonable and constitutionally defensible: the opportunity to voluntarily access Islamic legal provisions in matters that directly concern their religious obligations and personal lives.
These include areas such as:
- Marriage and divorce.
- Inheritance and estate administration.
- Family disputes.
- Endowments (waqf).
- Contracts and certain aspects of personal transactions.
- Religious mediation and arbitration.
These are matters in which Muslims already believe they are religiously bound by Islamic teachings. The demand is therefore not for the imposition of Sharīʿah upon non-Muslims but for the accommodation of Muslims who voluntarily wish to regulate aspects of their personal affairs according to their faith.
This is neither unusual nor unprecedented.
Across the world, plural societies provide mechanisms through which religious communities can resolve personal and family matters according to their traditions, provided such arrangements operate within the framework of the law and with the consent of the parties involved.
Viewed from this perspective, Sharīʿah Panels are not instruments of domination but mechanisms of religious accommodation. They are comparable to mediation and arbitration systems through which citizens voluntarily seek guidance and dispute resolution based on shared values and beliefs.
The intense opposition to even these limited arrangements raises important questions.
If Christians may organise their affairs according to Christian principles, and if practitioners of traditional religion may organise aspects of their communal and religious lives according to their convictions, on what basis should Muslims be denied the opportunity to seek guidance on inheritance, marriage, divorce and related matters from institutions grounded in Islamic law?
To oppose a full Islamic legal state is one thing.
To oppose Muslims having access to voluntary Sharīʿah-based mediation and personal law mechanisms is something entirely different.
The latter begins to resemble a systematic denial of the legitimate religious rights of Muslims.
Equally troubling is the recurring attempt to portray every discussion about Sharīʿah as a "Fulani agenda" or an externally inspired project.
Such claims are historically inaccurate, intellectually weak and socially divisive.
Islam did not arrive in Yorùbá land through Fulani people.
Yorùbá Muslims are not recent converts.
They are indigenous sons and daughters of the soil whose ancestors have practised Islam for centuries.
The desire of a Yorùbá Muslim to distribute his estate according to Islamic inheritance law, contract his marriage according to Islamic principles or resolve family disputes according to Islamic teachings has nothing to do with Fulani nationalism, Fulani expansionism or any external ethnic agenda.
It is simply the desire of a believer to practise his religion.
1/2
Dear Yoruba people, do not forget that this man came to Lagos Nigeria.
"When Muslims become the majority in the next 40 years, non-Muslims will have to convert to Islam, pay the Jizya or be killed because then Sharia will rule."
Go and live with your siblings in Afghanistan. You are free to move to your original now and leave the loving and peaceful Yorubaland. Since you are alien in SW.
I am first and foremost a Muslim. I am an adherent of Islam, an Abrahamic believer, and a Hanif before anything else. Only then am I Yorùbá.
To those who have made it their mission to question the loyalty of Yorùbá Muslims, you may continue your attacks. But know this: for a true Muslim, Islam will always come first. It precedes ethnicity, culture, and nationality because it is the primordial covenant with our Creator.
A Yorùbá Muslim is not conflicted in his identity. He was a Muslim in the divine decree long before he was conceived, and he entered the world as Yorùbá the day he was born to Yorùbá parents. These two identities are not rivals—they are perfectly compatible. One defines his eternal soul and purpose; the other shapes his language, culture, and earthly heritage. Both have their rightful place.
If any Yorùbá Muslim chooses, for whatever reason, to place ethnicity above Islam, then that person has failed to grasp the most fundamental principle of our faith: La ilaha illallah (there is no god but Allah), and nothing has precedence over Him. Such a person's reckoning is with Allah alone.
My identity is clear and unapologetic: Islam first. Always. Everything else follows in its proper order.
@Hameed_360@EsuOmo I dare you and your family to move to Afghanistan and live with your brothers instead of accommodating with peaceful Yoruba people .