Katie

🇨🇦 free speech and freedom of the press cannot be stifled in a free democratic Country

[Martyupnorth®- Unacceptable Fact Checker @Martyupnorth]

You absolutely have to watch this movie. Canada used to be a model nation. Not any more. This explains why.

[George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 @gtconway3d]

Insane.

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

MARK CARNEY IS TOAST

After today’s house of commons session there’s no recovery from this one

He’s been fully exposed

Even liberal supporters are outrage with this level of corruption

[Pierre Poilievre @PierrePoilievre]

If visitors come here and break our laws, charge them, convict them, deport them.

Enforce our laws and put Canada First: https://t.co/gdOrOQRTjo

[🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets @AntonioTweets2]

Victor Davis Hanson lays out that no one in America told Canada to import the equivalent of 45% of its population from non-assimilating sources, abandon its fossil fuels and pipelines, chase solar power in a frigid climate, accept the lowest GDP growth among industrial Western nations, or accept being $30–40k poorer per person/family than Americans. Nor did anyone force Canada to lead the world in assisted suicide as a cost-saving measure. Those choices—and the resulting inability to fund open borders, defense, or fair trade—came from Canadian leadership, not from Washington.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 MAJOR BREAKING -

350 Hamilton steelworkers just lost their jobs.

Up to 500 impacted.

Stelco is in survival mode.

The same tariffs Carney promised he could negotiate away.

He couldn't.

Now Hamilton pays for it.

Right before Christmas.

Carney flew to the UN and pledged $100 million to Palestine this week.

[Nick Leaf @Derricktgoat]

CPP is the latest on Carney’s chopping block as he takes $50 Billion from the CPP fund and Brookfield investments to privatize assets.

Our CPP fund held $863.6 billion in June of this year and should be independent of Mark Carney or Brookfield.

https://t.co/aDavuZIUNw

[Dante Rossi @tvc1five]

Ben Mulroney deserves credit for telling Canadians the truth: Mark Carney is steering the country toward a new European alliance without first seeking the consent of Parliament or the people. Learning our future from foreign newspapers is no substitute for open debate in the People’s House.

[Ms.BORN FREE 🇨🇦🙏 @LittleMsCujo]

Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet
Sept 20\26

My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering.
I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering.

The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM)

I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure

The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options).
The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield.
The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity.
The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM).
II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122)

Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person.
The Evidence:
Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5).
The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public.
Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard.
III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121)

This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings.
The Strategy:
We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm.
IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element)

To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity.
The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO).
The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship."
Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield).
Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office.
V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea)

The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below:
Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind."
The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes.

This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket."

CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada)
TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
DATE: February 13, 2026
I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION

This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034.
The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure.
Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay.
Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition).
III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA)

COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122)
The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings.
Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest.
COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c))
The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada.
Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject.
IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP

To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders:
Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals.
Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen.
Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements.
V. CONCLUSION

The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold.
I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026.
In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings.
The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis

Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals)

These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions.
The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status.
Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return).
The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts.
Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals)

This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office.
The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF.
Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push.
Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals)

A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program.
Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario.
The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities.
Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals
If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless.
Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals.

If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following;

1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post.
2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP.
3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement.
4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

📢 I am getting really tired of finding out what my own government is doing from somebody else’s podium in some distant foreign land.

Canadians were told Mark Carney was going to diversify our trade. He was going to find us new customers and make us less dependent on the United States so future trade disruptions have less impact.

Okay… so diversify!

Nobody remembers voting to blow up the relationship with the country that buys roughly two thirds of our exports, walk away from a deal because American demands supposedly threatened our “flexibility, independence, and sovereignty,” and then start sidling up to Brussels looking for something called associate membership.

That was not in the Liberal election brochure. That was not on the election ballot either! And it was not explained to the people who actually live here.

Three days ago, Carney was asked about reports Canada was exploring EU associate membership. No, he said. Canada was not looking to become a member of the European Union. He wanted a “unique alliance.” Then he flew to Europe.

There he sat in the European Parliament while Ursula von der Leyen delivered her hour long prepared State of the Union speech and proposed that Canada become the first associate member of the EU, a position that does not even exist yet.

Well… that seems to have escalated quickly. Except it didn’t.

Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada’s incoming ambassador to the EU, wandered out afterward and ruined the surprise. They had already talked about it. They knew it was going to be on the table. So stop playing word games with Canadians Mark Carney.

I do not care whether Carney calls it membership, associate membership, a unique alliance, or European Friendship Deluxe with free continental breakfast. What are you actually negotiating?

Do we get a vote on EU rules Canada may be expected to follow? If Brussels changes those rules, can Canada say no? Can Parliament? What Canadian laws and provincial regulations are being discussed? What has Ottawa already promised?

And why do we need this at all?

We already have CETA. We are already negotiating a digital trade agreement. We are already cooperating with Europe on defence, critical minerals, energy and technology.

So what does associate membership add? And more importantly, what does Canada give up to get it?

This is where my patience finally runs out!😡

A real leader in a real democracy would put this in front of the country. A referendum with a crystal clear question requiring a simple yes or a no from the people who have to live with the answer. Instead we get word games, photo ops in Strasbourg, and a Prime Minister who treats the House like a demon treats holy water: he will not sit in it unless he has to!

Carney walked away from Washington telling Canadians sovereignty was the line in the sand. If that is in fact the case - the real reason sputtered by Carney, then explain something to me like I am sitting at my kitchen table in Saskatchewan trying to pay the power bill…

If another country having too much influence over Canadian economic decisions is a threat to our sovereignty, how does another political bloc having influence over Canadian economic decisions protect it? Does sovereignty expire somewhere over the Atlantic?

Washington wanting a say in Canadian decisions was apparently so intolerable as to warrant walking away from the negotiating table with America. If Brussels wants a say, we are supposed to call it strategic autonomy. That is quite a parlour trick. One superpower wanting a say is tyranny. A whole bloc wanting a say is statesmanship. Huh, how convenient.

And drop the piety for a minute. A lot of the people who built this country left Europe for a reason. They left class systems, imperial ministries, conscription, religious tests, and distant capitals that decided their lives without asking. They crossed an ocean so their kids would not live under somebody else’s “common space.”

So why the hell are we walking back into it with a smile and a press release?

Europe is not sitting around enjoying unprecedented prosperity while von der Leyen hands Canada the secret recipe. She is getting hammered inside Europe over competitiveness, sky high energy costs, poverty inducing climate policy, uncontrolled migration and the direction she is taking the bloc. EU governments are already questioning parts of this proposed Canadian relationship.

Meanwhile Carney and von der Leyen sound like somebody photocopied the same economic manual and handed each of them half: carbon, climate, economic security, strategic autonomy, integration... all the things that make them indistinguishable from each other. One works from Brussels. One works from Ottawa.

Maybe this arrangement is wonderful. Then show us. Tell Canadians what you have discussed, what you have promised, what we are expected to follow, and whether we actually get a vote.

Do not brief Europe first. Do not announce it from a foreign parliament. Do not hide behind “unique alliance” like that phrase is a substitute for consent. Carney made sovereignty the standard. Not me… him.

So I have one request for Mackenzie Gray, Judy Trinh and every other journalist who gets close enough to stick a microphone in front of the Prime Minister.

Ask him.

Mr. Carney, if Canada could not accept becoming a rule taker for Washington because we are a sovereign country, why should Canadians accept becoming a rule taker for Brussels?

And if this is such a gift, why will you not put it to a national referendum instead of stepping around the people and the Parliament that is supposed to speak for them?

Please do not let him answer a different question. Canadians have been handled enough. At the core, it’s the same country, same sovereignty, and the same test.

Until we know what the hell they are signing us up for: Do not sign a damn thing!

~ Melanie ~

🔗 https://t.co/JmL5sXIwJ3
🔗 https://t.co/qf2xlLeg75

[Nana0000 @Nana00018487212]

Reality check:
Carney himself admitted on tape (as a central banker) that when voters blocked his ESG plans, “We” went around the voters through the back door — manipulating fossil fuel prices by withholding lending.
He doesn’t need the back door anymore.
He’s now PM with an unelected majority, using MPs as rubber stamps. The guard rails are gone:
• Judiciary appointed by you.
• Senate ~98% appointed by you.
• RCMP commissioners, Governor General — all yours.
• Media heavily funded and aligned by you.
Middle-class families are priced out of homes. Kids stuck in parents’ basements. Businesses disappearing by the thousands. Capital fleeing south. Alberta hammered with carbon mandates and $40–70B+ taxpayer-funded Pathways boondoggles that line connected interests (including Carney’s old world).
Violent crime up. Repeat offenders coddled. Record per-capita low-skilled immigration buckling infrastructure. Never-ending announcements while real viability is crushed.
This government has been rogue from day one — campaigned on smoke and mirrors, then did whatever served the net-zero/globalist agenda once in power.
The Canadian way of life — hard work leading to a home, family, and real future — is disappearing. Not by accident. By deliberate design.
Albertans, Westerners, and working Canadians see the whole captured system now.
Time to restore real guard rails, middle-class viability, energy abundance, and sovereignty — or get out of the way.
#LaurentianElites #BackDoorCanada #CapturedInstitutions #MiddleClassSqueeze #RogueGovernment #AlbertaStrong

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

Let me get this straight -- Mark Carney, a guy who was heli dropped into Canadian politics from the UK

who fired an Indian guy and stole his riding

who then got elected with a minority government but stole a majority through floor crossing

is entering into a 100 year agreement with Ukraine, and a "new partnership" with the EU

all without parliament in session?

[ProPublica @propublica]

Look at this photo we found from Donald Trump Jr.’s lavish Bahamas wedding.

Can you spot the Russian oligarch close to Putin who bankrolled the event? 🧵

[ProPublica @propublica]

New: Russian oligarch Umar Kremlev footed the bill for hundreds of thousands of dollars of wedding expenses at Donald Trump Jr.’s lavish wedding, including renting out a private island and paying for the fireworks show. https://t.co/5eAkam17gM

[Jasmin Laine @JasminLaine]

I don’t know how the CBC recovers from what was revealed today…

BUT…. the federal government’s plan for a state-curated news directory under Marc Miller tells you everything you need to know about their view of Canadians.

They don't think you're smart enough to think for yourself.

When the state funds the infrastructure that separates "legitimate" news from "illegitimate" news, you are experiencing the collapse of your own democracy, freedom, and dignity.

Just like the Allison Inquiries exposed top-down narratives in public health, this media strategy is about institutional control, not public service.

Let Canadians use their own damn judgment. Let them be free.

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

THIS COULD EXPLAIN WHY THE 🇨🇦🇺🇸 TRADE DEAL COLLAPSED.

Newt Gingrich claims a major sticking point was Chinese goods being trans-shipped through Canada into the United States allowing China to effectively use Canada as a backdoor into the U.S. market.

If true, this changes the entire story.

Canadians were told this was about sovereignty and standing up to Trump.

But was Washington actually demanding Canada crack down on Chinese trans-shipment and did Canada refuse?

The U.S. side has released far more detail about what happened in these negotiations.

Canada still hasn’t.

RELEASE THE DEAL.

[BBC News (World) @BBCWorld]

Oil hits $100 a barrel for first time since July after US and Houthi strikes https://t.co/7WWbSH3CmS

[Frank McVeety @Franktmcveety]

CBC’s Olivia Stefanovich: “It’s a deliberate choice by the Prime Minister’s Office to release a TED Talk-style video of the Prime Minister in a controlled way instead of making him available to reporters to hold a press conference, face questions.”
If Mark Carney is going to make decisions that affect our lives, he should have the audacity to answer questions.

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

NEW from Poilievre:

"No 'new world order' (with China)... No military cooperation with a regime that kidnapped our people, interfered in our elections, and set up police stations on our soil. Put Canada First!"

BAM! ..... LFG.

This is what I want to see. Canada FIRST!