Valerius Poplicola

[Valerius Poplicola @32TheShadow]

@Jikkyleaks @NICEComms @the_coopertron @NIH used @NICEComms doc. for their process. Then, later removed Sec. 6 but didn't note this as a revision (I've yet to find), which is a regs violation I believe. Morphine was used in the US. This must be investigated @RenzTom @KeithMalinak
#3tablets #NG163 #gerigate #iatrocide

[Natalie Winters @nataliegwinters]

REVEALED: Here Are the Mainstream Journalists on China’s Payroll 🚨

I exclusively uncovered the identities of prominent U.S. journalists flown to China by a CCP-linked influence operation seeking “favorable coverage” and “positive messages” about Beijing. 🧵

[Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson]

The one federal agency no one has even tried to reform is also the most powerful: CIA. Jim Erdman just resigned after a long career as an operations officer. He says the agency is completely out of control and dangerous.

0:00 The CIA's Obstruction of Justice
17:54 CIA Secrecy and the JFK Files
23:05 Is Tom Cotton a Tool of the CIA? How Does He Fit Into This?
26:47 Trump, the CIA's Control Over People, and Its Terrible Internal Leadership
30:59 Media Corruption and the Risks of Being a Whistleblower
36:43 How the CIA Influences the Behavior of the Media
40:45 Where Does the CIA Get Its Funding?
47:17 Is the Head of the CIA Compromised? Why Hasn't He Pursued Reform?
51:56 What's Stopping the Government From Releasing the JFK and 9-11 Files?
56:55 What Really Happened With Building 7?
1:01:41 Lee Harvey Oswald, MLK, J6, and the JFK Assassination
1:12:38 Is the DOJ Capable of Framing Someone?
1:17:38 Dan Bongino, the FBI, and Parallels Between the US and Foreign Countries
1:22:32 The Mistreatment of Joe Kent and Fall of the Trump Coalition
1:29:13 Erdman's Organization That Shut Down Vaccine Mandates
1:34:01 Was the CIA Involved in J6?

[Chris Martenson @chrismartenson]

I'm always open to hearing other POV's...and I'll tell you that from mine, @TuckerCarlson does the absolute best job of any communicator I've ever heard of conveying curiosity, authenticity, and framing. And I'm a tough judge.

It's the framing that matters the most. If we want to change the direction of things, and I do (and I hope you do as well), then the critical moment when 'things change' is when something called "Common Knowledge" breaks out.

Common Knowledge happens when everybody knows that EVERYBODY knows the same thing. That's when the real cultural change happens. @EpsilonTheory has an incredible series of essays on this dynamic, and is where I gathered this particular insight.

Back to the topic, what Tucker does better than anybody I've ever seen is talk about verboten topics as if it were perfectly fine talking about them. That creates the conditions for Common Knowledge to more rapidly appear.

Tucker is giving people permission to think, "Whoa. That idea in my head isn't just mine. It looks like it's actually both widely known and OK to speak out loud."

That's how real change happens. And I'm down for it.

[BobanDriclek @Bobinou92dep]

‼️ Vidéo enregistrée en 2007, à voir absolument par tous, au moins une fois dans la vie ‼️

Peu avant sa mort, Aaron RUSSO, un ancien ami de la famille ROTSCHILD, révèle tout sur le nouvel ordre mondial.

Depuis que cette interview passionnante a été enregistrée, cela fait presque vingt ans, les évenemenents n'ont fait que confirmer tout ce qui y a été dit et qui semblait farfelus à l'époque pour la majorité des gens.

Par conséquent, cette vidéo nous éclaire sur les événements passés, mais aussi à venir.

Bon visionnage à tous !

#ZionistPropagandaMachine #IsraelLies

[Stefan. @paradeevic]

https://t.co/fJgVOFIBhG

[Spike 1% @SpikeCalls]

https://t.co/iZG4HDFeOx

[Savvi_M @Savvi_251]

Twenty-two days ago, Shawn Ryan published his interview with @RealCandaceO. It was likely filmed days or maybe a few weeks before it aired.

Now Shawn says he’s had a profound spiritual experience that involved what he describes as the depths of hell, consulting an exorcism specialist, and ultimately saying he thinks God was trying to drawn him closer to Him.

I’ve said for months that I believe there’s a spiritual component to what’s happening around Candace’s coverage and behavior. I’m not claiming to know exactly why Shawn had that experience, but I don’t think the timing is something I’ll ignore.

[Matt Tucciarone @tucciarone2026]

🚨 EXPLOSIVE: For the first time, TPUSA & TPAction whistleblowers are uniting to expose the real culture inside.

We’ve been attacked HARD this week.

Meech @ArtifexMemor and I poured everything into the America First mission… only to watch it get subverted by foreign influence.

Watching our former boss Charlie Kirk get murdered on a global stage by the people closest to him is gut-wrenching.

We’re not here to derail any investigation.
We’re here to expose the demonic forces that made 9/10/2025 possible.

[Valerius Poplicola @32TheShadow]

https://t.co/RUfH5eY3N7

[Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX @JustTheTweets17]

Little piece of advice if you are ever in need of PR don't hire @AndrewKolvet

[Daniel Freer⚔ @DWF57]

@JustTheTweets17 @AndrewKolvet TPUSA firing long time PR pro was a bad move...

[Sword Truth @SwordTruth]

🚨BREAKING TPUSA Whistleblower says she was fired for questioning the official narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk's death. TPUSA is a corrupt Organization

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

🎥 The 2016 Obama “Illegals Can Vote” Moment — What Actually Happened

Many have raised one of the most damning pieces of video evidence in the election integrity debate. Let’s break down exactly what happened, what Obama said, and why this moment matters.

📋 The Interview: November 4, 2016

Four days before the election, Obama sat down with actress Gina Rodriguez for the Latino-focused digital outlet mitú. The interview was ostensibly about dispelling “voting myths.”

The critical exchange, verbatim:

Rodriguez: “Many of the millennials, DREAMers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?”

Obama: “Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over, and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.”

🔍 Why This Is So Incriminating

The apologists — Reuters, Snopes, the usual fact-check cartel — all rush to say “he was talking to citizens, not illegals!” But that’s a deliberately surface-level reading that ignores everything structurally wrong with this exchange.

Here’s what the defenders conveniently skip over:

1. The interviewer explicitly lumped “undocumented” people into the voting pool.

Rodriguez said “undocumented citizens” and “DREAMers” in the same breath as people who are “fearful of voting.” Obama did not correct her. He did not say “hold on, only citizens can vote.” He rolled with her framing — “I call them citizens because they contribute” — and built his entire answer on that foundation.

2. The message to anyone watching was unmistakable.

If you’re an illegal immigrant watching this, the President of the United States just told you: the voting rolls aren’t cross-checked with immigration enforcement, the sanctity of your ballot is confidential, nobody’s coming for you. Whether he technically said “you personally should vote” or not is irrelevant — the signal was broadcast loud and clear.

3. The follow-up made it worse.

Obama went on: “What is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you’re not just speaking for yourself. You’re speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice, who can’t legally vote.”

The framing is clear — citizens should vote on behalf of illegals. The illegals’ interests should be represented at the ballot box through citizen proxies. That’s the soft-sell version. The hard-sell version is what people reasonably inferred: the system won’t catch you, so go ahead.

🧠 The Institutional Gaslighting Machine

What happened next was textbook. Every fact-check outlet — Snopes, Reuters, Politifact — rushed to label the criticism “false” or “misleading.” Their argument? Obama technically said “when you vote, you are a citizen yourself,” so he was only addressing citizens.

This is the same playbook they run every time:

- Take the most literal, narrow, autistic reading possible of what was said

- Ignore context, tone, audience, and signaling

- Declare critics “took it out of context” while themselves stripping all context

- Cite themselves as authoritative — Snopes citing Snopes, Reuters citing Reuters

It’s particularly rich when the fact-checkers claim the video was “edited” or “clipped.” The full interview is available. The full transcript exists. The full context makes it worse, not better — because you see Rodriguez’s question was explicitly about undocumented people voting, and Obama never once said: “that would be illegal, don’t do it.”

🗳️ The Broader Pattern

This 2016 moment doesn’t exist in isolation. It’s part of a larger architecture:

- Same-day registration in blue states with no meaningful ID requirements

- Motor voter laws that automatically register people at the DMV — including non-citizens in some states, “by accident”

- Jurisdictions allowing non-citizen voting in local elections (Maryland municipalities, DC’s attempted law, San Francisco school board elections) — creating confusion about who can vote where

- Democrats fighting voter ID laws tooth and nail — if illegals aren’t voting, why oppose the most basic verification?

The pattern is consistent: make it as easy as possible for non-citizens to end up on the rolls, make it as hard as possible to verify eligibility, and create a cultural permission structure where voting while illegal isn’t treated as a real crime.

🎯 The Takeaway

The Obama-mitú interview is a Rorschach test.

If you trust institutions, you’ll accept the “he was only talking to citizens” gloss and move on.

If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll recognize it for what it was: the President of the United States, four days before an election, signaling to a Latino audience that voting won’t trigger immigration consequences — with the very first words out of his mouth being a correction of the premise that he conspicuously never made.

He never said, “if you’re not a citizen, you cannot vote.” He never said, “voting illegally is a crime.” He never said, “don’t do it.”

In a properly functioning republic, that would have been the first thing out of his mouth. The fact that it wasn’t tells you everything you need to know.

[the lich @thelichhh]

https://t.co/aqsY18NvVz

[Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 @BasedSamParker]

TODAY'S GoyTalk: I understand why @RealCandaceO says "Bolshevism became zionism." And while there's some truth to that, it would be better to say "many Bolshevik jews became zionist jews." Allow me to explain.

🔖BOOKMARK & SHARE THIS SUNDAY ESSAY 🔖

The reason why it's important to make that distinction is because the non-jewish component of these movements is not transforming from one into the other. Gentile communists haven't become zionists. To insinuate that launders jewish responsibility onto Gentiles.

Let's take a look.

The Democrat Party is the home of Bolshevism/Marxism/communism in the United States. And as of the latest polling, 80% of Democrats oppose israel, or look upon it unfavorably. Explicit support for the Palestinians amongst Democrats now outnumbers support for israel by 4-to-1.

However, amongst jewish Democrats, support for israel runs at around 85% in the latest polling. And around 80-85% of American jewry is, or recently was, Democrat. Indeed, American jewish females voted 88% for Kamala Harris in 2024.

This is creating a split in the Democrat Party between jews & Gentiles, similar to the split you're seeing on the Right between MAGA & America First. That is why you're now seeing jewish defection from the Democrat Party to MAGA, exemplified by people like Shabbos Kestenbaum and Batya Ungar-Sargon.

But this defection isn't new, and has actually happened before. The 20th Century saw the rise of the "Neoconservative" Republicans, or "Neocons." Who were they? They were liberal jewish Democrats "mugged by reality," as famously described by jewish Neocon founding father, Irving Kristol. One of those "realities" was that the old liberal coalition of the Left was fragmenting, and support for israel & jews was getting left behind.

The Neocons were mostly a group of jews who had descended from the revolutionary Leftist jewish movements of the late-19th/early-20th Century. Specifically, one of their most common "progenitors" was early jewish Bolshevik Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) who led the failed Bolshevik uprising against the Tsar in 1905-06, and then helped lead the successful Bolshevik revolution of 1917.

When Stalin's rise to power brought Trotsky's followers into ideological conflict with Stalinism, some Bolshevik Trotsky-ites left Russia and came to the United States, where they helped found & build the American Communist Party (CPUSA), and also the Big Labor/socialism-lite Democrat Party.

We need to take a small historical detour here. For thousands of years, jews have created a vast array of movements to organize themselves and advance jewish interests. One ancient example was the rivalry between the Pharisees and Sadduccees, and their mutual clashes with the Zealots during the jewish civil war of 66 AD (before Titus & the Roman legions put down the Great jewish Revolt).

Other movements have come and gone, while others have persisted: Yahwism, ba'alism, molechism, the rival kingdoms between the northern 10 tribes (israel) and the Southern kingdom (judah), the system of temple sacrifices & worship, rabbinic judaism, talmudism, Karaite judaism (rejected Talmud), kaballah, Sabbateanism, Frankism, Hasidism, orthodox judaism, Reform judaism, Bundism, etc. There are countless. We needn't list them all. You get the idea.

But whatever the movement, whatever the ideology, it's always been a competition or drive as to what's right for jews? What's the best way forward? What will advance the jew & their power as a people?

It's with this perspective that we return to the late 19th/early 20th Century and introduce two more recent jewish movements: Bolshevism & zionism. Again, jews were faced with what was the best way forward for the jewish people? Some jews were staunchly in the Bolshevism camp, others were in the zionism camp. Some had sympathies in both camps.

Within this milieu came Winston Churchill's famous essay "Zionism vs. Bolshevism, A Struggle For the Soul Of The jewish People." It's well exemplified by the the family of Chaim Weizmann—the first president of israel—amongst which were communists, zionists and bundists.

Bundism itself was a jewish labor movement that supported jewish autonomy, secularism, "yiddishism" and Marxism. It strongly opposed zionism at first, but several years after the successful establishment of israel, it came around and decided that maybe zionism and israel were an important contribution to the jewish people after all, and opened up offices in israel.

What I want you to see and understand is that this wasn't the first or only time conflicting jewish movements competed for the soul of the jewish people. Such struggles have been going on amongst them for literally thousands of years. And the other thing to understand is that many jews aren't rigidly or dogmatically faithful to only one movement for their entire lives. They tend to adapt, change & move around, and have sympathies that lie with various movements to one degree or another. Maybe you've heard the classic jewish saying, "2 jews, 3 opinions." The Talmud itself is built upon centuries worth of debates between jewish rabbis.

Because remember, the one overarching motivation behind all of them them is this: what is best for the jews? And that can change with changing circumstances and stages of life. So there have always been disagreements and competition amongst the jews about how to best look after jewish interests. But, there isn't disagreement that jewish interests is what they're all fighting for.

This motivation & neverending drive for tribal unity is why they have organizations like "The World jewish Congress," with its international legislative body for the jewish people—complete with candidates, representatives, slates of issues and voting. Many different jewish factions come together with their competing visions for the jewish people, and then vote to decide the best way forward. But they have many organizations and billionaire-funded think tanks dedicated to these purposes as well.

And that takes us back to these Trotsky-ite jews who eventually became the Neocons. Again, these Trotsky-ites came to America and helped build the modern Left, the Democrat Party and CPUSA. However, with the emergence of "Stalinist" communism, which they opposed—especially after the McCarthyism and the Red Scare of the 1950s—many jewish members of CPUSA left that party and joined their compatriots in the Democrat Party.

But that became problematic as well, because the Democrat Party also became infiltrated with Stalinist/Soviet sympathies, which at that time directly and stridently opposed israel, which it saw as an outpost of the West. This helped spawn the creation of something called the "New Left," which opposed israel & zionism, and therefore was at ideological odds with the old, liberal Leftist coalition that many jewish Democrats had been a part of.

Then, after the shock of the 6-Day War in which the Arab states had been backed by the Soviet Union, these Trotsky-ite jews decided that not only did the Democrat Party no longer best serve their interests, but it was also an existential threat to jews. So, some of them migrated to the Republican Party, which at that time was opposed to the Soviet Union and supportive of israel. They became the "New Conservatives" of the Republican Party—as opposed to the recently arisen "New Left" of the Democrat Party. The "Neoconservatives" shortened to "Neocons."

Another diversion is necessary at this point. An additional ideology also arose in order to resolve the Bolshevik/zionist tension: jewish-led "anti-zionism." This movement holds that the responsibility for zionism & israeli atrocities doesn't actually lie with jews, rather, it lies with White supremacy, European colonialism, Western imperialism, and Christian zionism. This allows Leftist/Democrat/Bolshevik jews to continue to coexist in (relative) harmony with their zionist jewish coethnics, by creating an abstract non-jewish boogeyman to blame. It's also helpful in conquering the goyim by getting the goyim to blame entities other than the one responsible—namely, jewish supremacy.

Anti-zionism allows Leftist Democrat jews to remain ideologically aligned with the larger Democrat Party, which is also largely anti-White, anti-Christian, and anti-Western. It also allows jews to continue advancing their interests by providing ideological cover for zionist jews to operate under cover while Gentiles take the blame.

But regarding the former topic, this is how turn-of-the-century Trotsky-ite Bolsheviks eventually became "neoconservative" Republicans, which currently dominate and form the basis of pro-israel MAGA.

(This is why the current jewish-wing of MAGA refers to antisemites on the Right as "woke." Their dividing line between Right/Left, Conservative/Liberal, and Republican/Democrat is support for israel, which it purposely shoehorns into "The West." If you don't support israel, then you must be a liberal, Leftist woke Democrat, who opposes israel.)

Here's the lesson: jews are whatever they need to be in order to advance the interests of the jewish people. And one of the major objectives of the jewish people is something called "Tikkun Olam," which literally means "to repair the world." That's like their mission statement. What it means in practice, though, is "to make the world jewish," or even more to the point "to subdue the world under jewish rule." It's about jewish supremacy and it always has been.

The mission of the jewish people is to advance jewish supremacy and establish world rule under the global jewish nation, of which israel is seen by most jews as an important part.

The purpose of these movements and ideologies that jews create and/or lead is to organize their jewish supremacy—which goes hand in hand with waging war on us, the "goyim." Organizing themselves and waging war on us are two sides of the same coin: establishing jewish supremacy. Sometimes the tension between sides is real and vicious (like in the jewish civil war of 66 AD), and sometimes it's just performative for Gentiles (like in the case of Noam Chomsky, who was best buddies with Jeffrey Epstein while also promoting anti-zionism).

For many jews of yesteryear, seeking the best interests of jews meant embracing & promoting Bolshevism. For many today, it means zionism. Some jews, like zionist Batya Ungar-Sargon (who describes herself as "MAGA Left/Marxist Right"), move effortlessly between the two.

jews are whatever they need to be in order to organize themselves and conquer the Gentiles. On the other hand, we Gentiles do NOT tend to move fluidly between Bolshevism and zionism like the jews do. That is why the modern Democrat Party is 80% opposed to israel. It has been ideologically aligned with communism & anti-zionism for decades, and it's not budging. While jewish Democrats move ever closer to israel, their fellow Gentile Democrats resist and pull away from israel.

And that is the problem with the generalized statement: "Bolshevism became zionism." It wraps Gentiles up into a dynamic that is uniquely jewish, and in doing so it deflects accountability and blame away from those responsible: jews.

Gentile Bolsheviks didn't become zionists. jewish ones did. Bolshevism and zionism aren't twin millstones created & controlled by Gentiles to grind down the Gentiles and subdue the world. They're for jews to do that to us.

We might just as well re-title Churchill's famous essay: "Bolshevism vs. zionism, A Struggle For The Best Way For jewish Supremacy To Enslave The Goyim."

This is the context you lose by simply saying "Bolshevism became zionism." No, jewish zionists embrace Bolshevism and use Bolshevik tactics—and vice versa—as they see necessary for the advancement of their interests and their supremacy over us.

EXHIBITS:
▪️Top Left: jewish support for israel
▪️Top Right: overall support for israel
▪️Bottom Left: relative support for Palestine vs. Israel amongst Democrats
▪️Bottom Right: jewish supremacy dialectic for reconciling opposing jewish factions, for pitting Gentiles against each other, and for deflecting blame away from jewish supremacy

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

Detailed Summary of “President Trump Addresses the Nation” on July 16th, 2026

President Trump begins the address by presenting an optimistic assessment of the country's condition under his administration. He argues that the United States has undergone a dramatic turnaround from what he describes as an inherited economic and social crisis characterized by high inflation, uncontrolled illegal immigration, rising crime, and declining international prestige. According to Trump, the nation is now experiencing renewed prosperity, stronger economic performance, increased foreign investment, lower inflation, record-breaking financial markets, and historically high employment. He also highlights several domestic policy achievements, including tax initiatives such as eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits, incentives for purchasing American-made vehicles, prescription drug pricing reforms, and the creation of "Trump Accounts," tax-advantaged investment accounts intended to help American children accumulate long-term wealth.

Trump next turns to immigration and public safety, claiming that the southern border has become the most secure in American history. He asserts that illegal immigration has effectively been halted, that crime has fallen nationwide, and that the murder rate has reached historic lows. He also emphasizes continued military investment, describing the U.S. armed forces as the strongest in the world. Brief references are made to foreign policy, including cooperation with Venezuela on oil production and what he characterizes as favorable developments involving Iran, though he provides few specifics before transitioning to what he identifies as the central purpose of the speech.

The primary focus of the address is election security. Trump argues that public trust in elections is indispensable to maintaining confidence in government and national unity. He announces the immediate declassification of intelligence documents that he says expose serious vulnerabilities in America's election infrastructure. According to Trump, the objective of releasing these materials is not to undermine confidence in elections but to strengthen it through transparency, public awareness, and corrective action.

Trump organizes the newly released material into five principal areas.

The first concerns alleged Chinese cyber operations targeting American voter data. Trump states that intelligence indicates the People's Republic of China conducted what he describes as one of the largest compromises of election-related data in history beginning around the 2020 election cycle. According to his description, Chinese actors allegedly acquired approximately 220 million U.S. voter records containing names, addresses, telephone numbers, political affiliations, and other registration information. He argues that this information could be used to facilitate election interference and claims Chinese intelligence established specialized units dedicated to exploiting the stolen data.

Trump further alleges that senior officials within portions of the U.S. intelligence community deliberately suppressed information regarding the Chinese operation. According to his account, intelligence agencies became aware that voter registration information from numerous states had been compromised, yet failed to inform either the President or Congress. He contends that officials instead publicly emphasized that the 2020 election was secure while internally possessing information suggesting significant vulnerabilities.

The speech then expands beyond cyber intrusions into broader allegations regarding Chinese influence efforts. Trump cites intelligence reports dating back to 2018 and 2019 that he says describe a Chinese government strategy aimed at weakening his presidency, influencing American public opinion, encouraging opposition among business leaders, and cultivating favorable media coverage through financial incentives. He argues these activities formed part of a comprehensive campaign to undermine his administration politically.

Trump next discusses intelligence that he says was obtained by the FBI in 2020 alleging Chinese involvement in efforts to manufacture illegal ballots benefiting Joe Biden. He claims this intelligence was never presented in his daily presidential briefings because officials intentionally removed or minimized such reporting. He references internal communications that he says reveal analysts deliberately withheld information about Chinese election activities. Trump also alleges that one FBI official referred internally to operating a "shadow government" designed to prevent politically sensitive intelligence from reaching senior leadership or the public.

The President then references recently discovered "burn bags," explaining that these bags reportedly contained government documents that had been scheduled for destruction during the Obama administration but instead remained intact due to what he characterizes as bureaucratic incompetence. He states that the recovered materials have produced significant findings and announces that he has directed the Department of Justice, FBI, CIA, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to investigate why information was withheld and whether criminal charges are warranted.

The third category of declassified material concerns election technology itself. Trump argues that electronic voting machines, centralized voter registration databases, ballot-counting systems, and related election infrastructure have long been recognized within the intelligence community as vulnerable to cyber compromise. He states that classified assessments identified Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and non-state actors as possessing the capability to penetrate or manipulate election systems. Trump says these assessments demonstrate that government officials were aware of these vulnerabilities for years while publicly assuring Americans that election systems were secure.

He further references intelligence describing cyber methods that allegedly could digitally alter vote totals in ways that would evade traditional audits. Trump argues that these findings underscore the necessity of replacing or significantly reforming existing election technology to eliminate opportunities for manipulation.

The fourth section of the address focuses on alleged domestic election fraud investigations. Trump describes an investigation in Michigan in which state police reportedly executed search warrants involving a voter registration organization. According to his description, investigators obtained admissions from canvassers who allegedly signed voter registration forms using false identities, submitted fraudulent registrations, and received financial incentives based on the number of applications collected. Trump states that FBI investigators believed crimes had occurred but that the Biden Justice Department terminated the investigation before prosecution. He directs the current FBI Director to reopen and fully investigate the matter.

Trump also discusses findings from a Department of Homeland Security review that he says identified thousands of noncitizens registered to vote in federal elections. He argues that because some states declined to share voter registration data, the actual number may be significantly larger. He contends that outdated voter rolls containing noncitizens and deceased individuals represent additional vulnerabilities that undermine election integrity.

Throughout the speech, Trump criticizes existing election administration practices, particularly extended ballot-counting periods and widespread mail-in voting. He cites California's lengthy vote-counting process as evidence that election administration has become inefficient and susceptible to public distrust. He argues that large-scale mail voting creates opportunities for fraud and should be significantly restricted.

Trump also sharply criticizes major news organizations, specifically mentioning NBC and ABC, after stating that they declined to broadcast the address. He accuses portions of the media of deliberately minimizing election security concerns and participating in efforts to conceal vulnerabilities from the American public. He argues that media organizations have failed in their responsibility to provide objective reporting on matters of national importance.

The President concludes by outlining several actions his administration intends to pursue immediately. He states that affected states will be notified if their voter registration data was compromised, and that DHS will brief state officials regarding cyber vulnerabilities affecting election infrastructure. Federal agencies, he says, will work with states to improve cybersecurity protections before upcoming elections. DHS will also notify states regarding individuals identified as noncitizens on voter rolls so that appropriate eligibility reviews can occur.

Finally, Trump urges Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which he presents as the legislative solution to many of the vulnerabilities described during the speech. As summarized by Trump, the proposal would require photo identification for voting, documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, restrictions on mail-in voting except for specified circumstances such as military service, disability, illness, or travel, and measures intended to improve the accuracy of voter registration rolls. He calls on Americans to contact their elected representatives and encourage passage of the legislation, arguing that restoring confidence in elections is essential to preserving democratic institutions and strengthening national unity.

The address closes with an appeal for bipartisan support for election integrity reforms, a call for national unity around free and fair elections, expressions of support for the U.S. military, and the traditional closing, "God Bless America."

###

Summary in 30 Bullet Points

President Trump opens by asserting that the United States is stronger, safer, and wealthier than when his administration took office.

He characterizes the prior administration as leaving behind severe inflation, an unsecured southern border, rising crime, and declining international respect.

He states that inflation has experienced its largest monthly decline in more than six years.

He highlights tax initiatives including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security benefits, along with tax incentives for purchasing American-made vehicles.

He says stock markets and retirement accounts have reached record highs.

He claims his prescription drug pricing policies have reduced drug costs and lowered healthcare expenses.

He promotes “Trump Accounts,” describing them as tax-advantaged investment accounts intended to help children build long-term savings.

He states that America’s borders have become the most secure in U.S. history.

He claims zero illegal immigrants have been admitted into the United States during the previous 14 months.

He says national crime rates, including the murder rate, have fallen significantly.

He emphasizes continued investment in the U.S. military, describing it as the world’s strongest armed force.

He references energy cooperation with Venezuela and says positive developments regarding Iran will become apparent soon.

He argues that trustworthy elections are essential to maintaining public confidence in government.

The central announcement of the speech is the immediate declassification of intelligence documents concerning election security.

He says the purpose of releasing the documents is to increase transparency by exposing and addressing vulnerabilities.

Trump alleges the documents show that China conducted a massive operation to obtain U.S. voter registration data beginning around the 2020 election cycle.

According to his remarks, the compromised data allegedly included voter names, addresses, phone numbers, party affiliations, and other registration information.

He claims intelligence agencies knew about the alleged compromise but withheld the information from both the President and Congress.

He further alleges that intelligence officials deliberately minimized or suppressed reporting regarding Chinese election-related activities.

Trump says additional intelligence indicates China sought to influence U.S. politics through media, business leaders, and public opinion campaigns.

He alleges the FBI received intelligence in 2020 concerning efforts related to manufacturing illegal ballots for Joe Biden but says the information was buried by officials.

He claims internal communications show presidential intelligence briefings omitted significant information regarding Chinese election interference.

Trump references recently discovered “burn bags,” suggesting they contained government records that were supposed to have been destroyed but instead were recovered.

He announces that the Department of Justice, FBI, CIA, and Director of National Intelligence have been directed to investigate why intelligence was allegedly withheld and to pursue criminal charges where appropriate.

Trump argues electronic voting machines, centralized voter databases, and ballot-counting systems are vulnerable to cyberattacks by foreign governments and non-state actors.

He cites newly released intelligence spanning 2022–2026 that he says documents cyber vulnerabilities affecting U.S. election infrastructure.

He discusses alleged election fraud investigations, including a Michigan voter registration case, asserting that evidence was not fully pursued by the prior Justice Department.

He says DHS reviews identified noncitizens registered to vote and contends that outdated voter rolls contribute to election vulnerabilities.

Trump criticizes lengthy ballot-counting processes, particularly citing California, and argues that major media organizations have avoided covering election security issues.

He concludes by urging Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which he says would require photo voter identification, proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration, restrict most mail-in voting to specified exceptions, require states to remove ineligible voters from registration rolls, and strengthen election security measures.

Election Integrity Documents

The recently declassified documents from President Trump’s July 16, 2026 address are available here on the official White House site:

https://t.co/d6wfHlFTkz

Key Sections & Downloads (ZIP files):

- Vulnerabilities in Electronic Voting & Ballot-Counting Systems

- China’s Acquisition and Exploitation of American Voter Data (references ~220 million voter files)

- Michigan Voter-Registration Investigation

- Noncitizens on State Voter Rolls (references ~278,000 non-citizens)

The page includes summaries from the administration and direct download links for the document packages.

[Valerius Poplicola @32TheShadow]

Oppose Section 224 of the FY 2027 NDAA. It forces integration of U.S. and Israeli defense technology, AI, quantum systems, and data; creating permanent foreign access to our most sensitive military capabilities. U.S. national security must remain under exclusive American control

[T.E. Jentzen @Faithful2Pray]

In His Passion, Jesus Christ suffered greatly for the sins of man. He wore the crown of thorns, was scourged at the pillar, and had the Five Holy Wounds inflicted upon Him. While most Catholics know of these, few are familiar with the shoulder wound of Jesus, and the miraculous story behind its devotion.
Tradition says as Jesus walked the three miles from Pontius Pilate’s courtyard to His Crucifixion at Calvary, the Cross dug through His shoulder
ripping flesh from bone. According to a pious legend, Saint Bernard of Clairvaux prayed and asked of Christ what was his greatest unknown suffering, and what wound suffered in His Passion was most painful. Christ replied to him:

“I had on My Shoulder while I bore My Cross on the Way of Sorrows, a grievous Wound which was more painful than the others, and which is not recorded by men.”
Christ asked that Saint Bernard and other members of the Faithful keep a devotion to his shoulder wound, and that those who do will receive God’s grace.
“Honor this Wound with thy devotion, and I will grant thee whatsoever thou dost ask through its virtue and merit. And in regard to all those who shall venerate this Wound, I will remit to them all their venial sins, and will no longer remember their mortal sins.”

Saint Bernard heeded Christ’s call, composing a beautiful devotional prayer to honor the shoulder wound of Our Savior:

“O Loving Jesus, Meek Lamb of God, I, a miserable sinner, salute and worship the most Sacred Wound of Thy Shoulder on which Thou didst bear Thy heavy Cross, which so tore Thy Flesh and laid bare
Thy Bones as to inflict on Thee an anguish greater than any other wound of Thy Most Blessed Body. I adore Thee, O Jesus most sorrowful; I praise and glorify Thee and give Thee thanks for this most sacred and painful Wound, beseeching Thee by that exceeding pain and by the crushing burden of Thy heavy Cross, to be merciful to me, a sinner, to forgive me all my
mortal and venial sins and to lead me on towards Heaven along the Way of Thy Cross. Amen.”
While Saint Bernard was the first to venerate the shoulder wound, he was not the last. Saint Padre Pio kept a devotion and also suffered the same wound himself as a stigmata. When Pope Saint John Paul II was still a priest he visited Padre Pio and asked him which wound was his most painful. Father Wojtyła expected that it was his chest wound, but the saint replied:
“It is my shoulder wound, which no one knows about and has never been cured
or treated.”
Prior to his death, Padre Pio confided to Brother Modestino Fucci at his friary in San Giovanni Rotondo that his greatest pains happened when took off his shirt. At the time, Fucci believed it to be his chest wounds much like John Paul II. When he was later assigned the task of inventorying all the items inside the cell of the late Padre Pio, he noticed his undershirts had blood stains on the right shoulder.
That night, Brother Fucci prayed asking Padre Pio for a sign if he truly bore the shoulder wound of Christ. At 1 A.M., he awoke with an excruciating pain in his right shoulder and the room was filled the aroma of flowers, the sign Padre Pio’s spiritual presence, and he heard a voice call out: “This is what I had to suffer!”

[Mula Mule @MulaMule300]

Jesus was not a “Jew”.

He was a 1st century Judean Israelite.

The claim is a modern invention that ignores history and linguistics.

One of my best performing posts (which got taken down), now turned into an easy to read infographic so even illiterate pagans can understand.

[Ashton Forbes @AshtonForbes]

If we were taught physics correctly, we would have warp drive engineers already.

Instead we've been brainwashed into thinking space is an empty vacuum.

We live on a flat plane where everything is connected.