Not sure who needs to read this, but here is a thread on how to take high quality photos of UAP/drones that can be used later to triangulate position, altitude, and size of drones....If enough people in NJ do it and the raw photos are posted online:
https://t.co/5YeuUwNmrm
Hi @TheProjectUnity@InfiniLuc@EngagingThe
1. Thought it would be interesting to create a thread to discuss data collection during CE5 type events. I’ve been working on techniques using off the shelf tools that folks might already have at home. Love to hear what you use.
Hi @TheProjectUnity@InfiniLuc@EngagingThe
1. Thought it would be interesting to create a thread to discuss data collection during CE5 type events. I’ve been working on techniques using off the shelf tools that folks might already have at home. Love to hear what you use.
@LeeNich40634972 This footage was just another random ufo potato vid. uploaded about 5 years ago, but it stuck in my mind as the form was really unique. Either a creative hoax or something clearly not a typical aircraft, kite, air clutter. Only when reading the IC did it pop by in my mind.
@PJA_OrbisCast Thanks, I just by chance happened to recall seeing something similar to 'boomerang' description when reading the document last night. Took a bit of time to comb though YouTube as it had been a few years. The vid stood out to me as it was so atypical in form.
4/5 With more credible information regarding morphologies and characteristics we may be able to go back to the public records and sift through for genuine UAP footage.
Here's a link to the original video:
https://t.co/4ssiYJfXZN
1/5 Very long time since I posted here, but noticed something interesting regarding the 'Boomerang' referenced in the Immaculate Constellation document.
3/5 This correlated very closely to a UAP video posted to Youtube a few years ago that showed a similar event. Here is a stabilised version of the video, taken near Cuba apparently:
@paulsanderson@RonyVernet@enigmalabs I believe this is the same phenom. - its global. @RonyVernet have a look at heavensat software, its not as well know or pretty as stellarium, but easier to load and verify your satellite datasets.
1. Update on ‘Racetrack-Starlink Phemonenon’ mentioned by @BenHansen00#ufotwitter
If the phenom is visible to pilots, then it should also be visible to astronomers on the ground given the correct conditions. Below is timelapse of 30 sec exp. images taken by a skywatcher:
3. Frankly I'm quite pleased that we did stumble upon a previously unknown ariel phenomenon, that someone (@flarkey and @ChrisSPITZER7 co authors?) could write up in a publication.
@AgniVAugusT@528vibes I'd be happy to take a look but need more information as a starting point including: flight no, lat/long of plane when taken, time of the observation, approximate bearing to the object. The original file with exif data would be the the best.
@flarkey@BenHansen00@ChrisSPITZER7 Also, there are amateur satellite observers reporting on mailing lists reporting a similar phenomenon. Just yesterday around Oct 12 at 1209UT in Florida in the NW/N direction the same phenomenon was observed. I would suggest folks in the US have a look
1. Had a look at @BenHansen00 's latest video to try to calculate the probability that the ‘racetrack’ UAP could have been satellites.
There are a few issues that pop up with the observations, namely that they all occur in the same region of the sky. @ChrisSPITZER7
@flarkey@BenHansen00@ChrisSPITZER7@flarkey, I was not able to see the satellites you mentioned in my software in that configuration. However at 0517 UT on 19AUG22 Startlink 2494 is in the correct position, but Starlink 1736 is far, (not even visible) per my TLE database, which was updated yesterday.
@flarkey@BenHansen00@ChrisSPITZER7 We have never had such a large fleet of identical satellites moving in the same orientation before, and this could produce a new phenomenon that people (even the very experienced) are not used to seeing. Just look how often tightly grouped starlink ‘trains’ are misidentified
@flarkey@BenHansen00@ChrisSPITZER7 I would also agree with the pilots (and others) that this does not *look* like what we would expect from a sat. However, I would caution that what *looks* normal may no longer hold true as the satellite ecosystem is changing rapidly. In 2 years my Sat DB went from 22K to 38K.
@flarkey@BenHansen00@ChrisSPITZER7 However, given the pilot testimony (which I hold in high regard, as they are quite excellent observers - I’m not trying to discount their testimony) this phenom has a long duration, but appears in the same location of the sky, Starlink fits this quite well.