@MvonRen@kyle_ferriter@liteshaper2@ChatGPT ah you're right. It is indeed RPOINT with flashing square - indicating that tracking of the object is about to stop and RATE G is about to take over and attempt to stabilise the camera on a ground point.
So explain to me again how tracking doesn't stop?
@MvonRen@kyle_ferriter@liteshaper2 Mate, just type it into @ChatGPT and post the screenshotπ€£
The answer is that RPOINT tracks features in the image like bright pixels , but RATE G uses the gyros to keep the camera fixed on a point on the ground. The flashing square means the image tracking has stoppedπ
@MvonRen@liteshaper2@kyle_ferriter "tracking does *not* stop."
Ok, so please explain to me what the three OSD modes that we see are:
1. RPOINT
2. RATE G with flashing square.
3. RATE G
For a bonus point - Which of those modes tracks features in the scene (pixels) and which one fixes on ground reference point?
@MvonRen@liteshaper2@kyle_ferriter "tracking does *not* stop."
Ok, so please explain to me what the three OSD modes that we see are:
1. RPOINT
2. RATE G with flashing square.
3. RATE G
For a bonus point - Which of those modes tracks features in the scene (pixels) and which one fixes on ground reference point?
@MvonRen@liteshaper2@kyle_ferriter Absolutely! that is true if the camera is stationary and the object is moving, but that's not what is happening here.
Imagine the camera is moving fast (eg on a drone) and is tracking a slow moving object (eg a balloon). What would we see in that scenario when tracking stops?
@liteshaper2@MvonRen@kyle_ferriter nope. it strongly suggests independent platform movement (forward flight!) and changes in camera Az/El tracking (which is exactly what we see on the On Screen Display) of a slow moving small object much closer to the camera than the background.
@MvonRen@kyle_ferriter Hmm, interesting. However, if you look closely- the blur from the object descends a little, which is what we'd expect to see (due to parallax) if the object was close & in front of a distant background & the camera was moving upwards.
Nice catch! It all fits with parallax.π―
@MvonRen@kyle_ferriter I blocked you because you refuse to understand.
Simple question = simple answer:
The object moves out of frame to the right because of the movement of the platform to the left (west) & the effect of parallax.
The background moves because of where the camera is pointing.
@KCegj4491@MvonRen@MickWest@GoodTroubleShow@kyle_ferriter the motion backwards and up is because the auto lock has stopped but the camera continues to move for ~3secs in the same direction and speed hoping to reacquire lock. When this stops is the moment that the object zips off.
@LegacyProgramVP@MvonRen@kyle_ferriter@ZaineMichael1@MickWest@thecholla I wouldn't say he's an idiot but he does seem to have difficulty in understanding simple arguments (parallax) or accepting valid criticism from others. He seems to think that acceptance of someone else's point is a personal failure. I can see why he's popular with UFOfans.
THIS GUY LIVES UNDER SFO'S TAKEOFF PATH SO HE BUILT A CEILING PROJECTOR THAT TRACKS EVERY PLANE FLYING OVER HIS HOUSE IN REAL TIME
he uses a cheap $30 radio receiver to pick up the signals that planes broadcast while flying.
then projects them onto his ceiling in real time
when a jet flies over his house you hear it outside and at the exact same moment a plane glides across his ceiling labeled with the airline, aircraft type, and destination
pure black background so the projector's rectangle disappears and only the aircraft are visible
but he didn't stop at planes
it also draws the real sky behind them. sun, moon, bright stars, constellations, and live satellites including the ISS. all at their true positions for his exact location and time in real time
so he's lying in bed watching the actual night sky projected onto his ceiling with real planes crossing through it as they take off from SFO
there is a huge market for every man alive that runs outside to see the helicopter
vibe coded the whole thing himself with a cheap radio, a projector, and some clever software
@MvonRen@MickWest@GoodTroubleShow@kyle_ferriter lol This conversation has been an entire waste of time Marik. Your inability to accept that the camera is moving & therefore objects on the LoS will appear to move with respect to the background due to the parallax effect is astonishing.
You should read a book on it.
@MvonRen@MickWest@GoodTroubleShow@kyle_ferriter Er... not a shred of evidence?π€¦π»
It's not difficult to understand...
π·The camera is moving. βͺObjects on the LoS will appear to move WRT the background.
π―When tracking stops suddenly the platform / camera movement to the left causes the zip to the right.
πππ»