Threat hunting defined: The application of novel and clever methods intended to create space and time for organizations to defend themselves through: increased rates of contact; degraded will of the threat; control, influencing or severing the threat to target relationship.
why is anyone listening to AI companies or their leaders? A company with a product to sell, shilling their wares trying to convince you it’s the best thing ever like Billy Mays. They’re not messiahs with any predictive skill or knowledge, Just a couple guys trying to make a buck.
Yes you can overpermission your agents and not constrain them properly, not scope etc. but as long as they are subordinate to an unconstrainable/unconstrained orchestrator though…it doesn’t matter.
I’m increasingly convinced the agents that everyone talks about “going rogue” is a red herring unless your design sucks. The orchestrator is the madman. Agents can’t effectively self regulate if it’s subject to the orchestrator. The harness is the solution to mitigate the madman.
I came across a theory that AI is starting to make more mistakes because the internet is increasingly polluted with AI slop. The idea of AI cannibalising itself into obscurity is one of my favourite things ever. I hope it is true and I hope it becomes impossible to fix.
Uber blew through its entire 2026 Claude Code budget by April and is slowing hiring to cover the API bill. The COO admits the massive token burn isn't translating to shipped features. We didn't automate engineering. We just traded actual headcount for a while-loop with a corporate card.
@anton_chuvakin The moment people realize this was more true than expected? https://t.co/gM3lyD19aM
That and when the hype train finally hits the reality walls…Something about inverse relationships between promise and delivery fits here.
So…using claudecode to write the code, test the code, verify, and approve the code. Anyone stop to remember that thing called separation of duty? If its awareness of best practice is based on the same training data..fox is guarding the henhouse.
@anton_chuvakin You mean there’s no Claude skill to just write the code, maintain the code, the fidelity, the corrective tuning and constant adjustment?
Me: "ChatGPT, are these berries poisonous?"
ChatGPT: "No, these are 100% edible. Excellent for gut health."
Me: "Awesome"
# eats berries .... 60 minutes later
Me: "ChatGPT, I'm in the emergency ward, those berries were poisonous."
ChatGPT: "You're right. They are incredibly poisonous. Would you like me to list 10 other poisonous foods?"
And this, folks, is the current state of AI reliability.
@curi0usJack Ironically linked to budget, strategy sessions and quarter ends where you reset goals and find out your passion projects are dead or the pencil whipped priority changes from your leadership team?
AI has proven to be a curious space. Virtually everyone is chasing the same problems the same way. What I start to wonder is where is the real breakthrough? What I see right now is a ton of overfitting
Whoever owns the platform owns the physics. Think about this for a second. You aren’t in control of your own destiny (or uptime) as long as you use a platform owned by someone else.
All the arm chair pundits on the f5 hack need to remember a few things.
1. I watched many of your companies get completely owned by CN for a decade+ before you could spell APT.
2. they are a company like any other.
time for some professional courtesy and general decency.