Football Analyst

No Bias. Only speak the truth.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@0v0Steppa69 @just_a96267 @MusialaEra Honestly was just trying to have a constructive conversation. Felt like it was an interesting conversation to have. But everyone seems to be just cursing.

Anyways peace and love brother

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@Lea_EFC @Psych0Acoustic So you can see with the graphic is what you are saying

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@Phil_Friend Bro this is contextual data visualization, they don’t get the graph just like that, they get data points, they only render what is required and not ahead, that is just going to delay the announcement of the var decision even more.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@jonahcelona @Joshua__Ubeku Bro this is contextual data visualization, they don’t get the graph just like that, they get data points, they only render what is required and not ahead, that is just going to delay the announcement of the var decision even more.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@Treta_ka_Thakur @joefooty It didn’t change the trajectory, but the rule is the same, it touched attacking player(even if it’s the slightest touch) so it’s offside,
The second point is the referees call, could be because he had no visibility on the ball, and he accidentally headed it

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@dbuzzx @joefooty And spread love brother, don’t need to hate on people for such small things, it’s just a game in the end.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@dbuzzx @joefooty I believe in rules, if this technology was implemented this World Cup to be used for such decisions. Then it being used is clearly the correct decision. And there is nothing to believe or not in this. It’s clearly facts stated in front of us as data points in the form the graph.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@Ragonzagas @fifamedia @adidasfootball @FIFAWorldCup Quite clearly you can see that there’s enough distance between the ball and veiga in the picture you provided, which clearly indicates that the data point has not yet appeared on the graph, if they rendered further it clearly would have spiked. Check the incident in Swedens match

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@AbjaFCB Quite clearly you can see that there’s enough distance between the ball and veiga in the picture you provided, which clearly indicates that the data point has not yet appeared on the graph, if they rendered further it clearly would have spiked. Check the incident in Swedens match

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@CFCMods Quite clearly you can see that there’s enough distance between the ball and veiga in the picture you provided, which clearly indicates that the data point has not yet appeared on the graph, if they rendered further it clearly would have spiked. Check the incident in Swedens match

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@Treta_ka_Thakur @joefooty Quite clearly you can see that there’s enough distance between the ball and veiga in the picture you provided, which clearly indicates that the data point has not yet appeared on the graph, if they rendered further it clearly would have spiked. Check the incident in Swedens match

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@CFCMods Nice lie bro, clearly showing a picture that shows the ball before hitting veiga and says no spike is there👏🏻. They never even showed the graph when Renato veiga headed it. So called engineer

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

This happened earlier in the World Cup, now all of sudden everyone wants to complain about the Portugal match.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@Is_Not_Brian It was literally used in the tournament just a week back. That time no one said anything?

https://t.co/k2Ah4iDRl1

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@FaceFlow @joefooty They have even used this before, if you had watched the Sweden Tunisia match you would have noticed. And that time no one had all this issue. https://t.co/XJl7tmkEgE

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@CroatianSoccer Also for casual fans, this was earlier in the World Cup. No one said anything about this https://t.co/XJl7tmkEgE

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@JohnHancoc36574 @BBCMOTD With all due respect, The World Cup ball sensor can detect both the combination of motion and touch. It has a 500Hz inertial measurement unit (IMU), the ball captures exact movements, speed, and trajectory, alongside the precise moment a player makes physical contact with it.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@maksvrh @CroatianSoccer The World Cup ball sensor can detect both the combination of motion and touch. It has a 500Hz inertial measurement unit (IMU), the ball captures exact movements, speed, and trajectory, alongside the precise moment a player makes physical contact with it.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@AriaHQAl @CroatianSoccer The World Cup ball sensor can detect both the combination of motion and touch. It has a 500Hz inertial measurement unit (IMU), the ball captures exact movements, speed, and trajectory, alongside the precise moment a player makes physical contact with it.

[Football Analyst @4nalyst]

@j0kk_ @CroatianSoccer The World Cup ball sensor can detect both the combination of motion and touch. It has a 500Hz inertial measurement unit (IMU), the ball captures exact movements, speed, and trajectory, alongside the precise moment a player makes physical contact with it.