j0kk_

ayooo

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@jezwyke @Shayan86 Body moving toward the ball flight, head down and under it, elbows up, hits the head. He wanted it out for the corner.

That's a deliberate play.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@4nalyst @CroatianSoccer 0 relevance to hair brushing past the ball.

There has to be at least some form of impact.
500MHz isn't enough to detect hair grazing past the ball, unless it touched the head, in which case the head would've been the impact sensed.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@CroatianSoccer And moreover, there was no reading that shows Veigas header which occurred right after.

This means they have to cut the readings in a very specific spot.
The readings must be edited to present to us as such.

But no, Matanović's hair triggered the chip... 🤣

Gaslighting 🤣🤣

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@CroatianSoccer Are we kidding ourselves right now in saying that the hair of Matanović, triggered the chip in the ball?
If it were that sensitive, it would pick up the air, and readings would be impossible to differentiate.

Do not be gaslit.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@MaestrosCaliber @semideias_11 @CanadianKobzar @CroatianSoccer Take a look at his position before it passes Matanović's head, if he wanted to avoid it, why did he move toward the ball?? 🤣

Obvious attempted clearance.

[DZvone🇭🇷 @maric_provizije]

@CroatianSoccer Ball didn’t change the spin nor the trajectory, and even then, Veiga touches it
no way this is offside🥺

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FIFAcom @FIFAWorldCup

🖕Mafia fixing hacks.

[CroatianSports @CroatianSoccer]

You’re telling us that Veiga didn’t make a play on the ball?

Alright.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@GrabmNStabem @FutPoliceLeaks This FutPoliceLeaks guy doesn't understand logic, he will make unsubstantiated claims, and then contradict himself.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@CroatianSoccer I'm glad you asked this question.
He gave a non-answer, he didn't satisfy the question.

But good on you.

Clearly, Veiga intended to defensively header the ball, making the offside reset.

Good on you for asking this question.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

#zlatkodalic #lukamodric

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

Even IF Matanović touched the ball, Veiga went for an intentional defensive header.

You can see his elbows brace behind him to go for a clearance.

This resets any offside.

It was a goal.

#worldcup #croatia #portugal #fifa #matanovic #veiga #modric #ronaldo

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

Even IF Matanović touched the ball, Veiga went for an intentional defensive header.

You can see his elbows brace behind him to go for a clearance.

This resets any offside.

It was a goal.

#worldcup #croatia #portugal #fifa #matanovic #veiga #modric #ronaldo

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem "Referee agree" is an appeal to authority.
This is a logical fallacy of appeal to authority.

You are not contending with my argument.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem LOL okay, so you concede then.

We've already established Veiga wanted to header defensively, but missed it.

Thanks mate.

Goal.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem Yes absolutely intention to control, he went for a defensive header clearance!

As per rules, if it's an intended header for clearance, even if it's a misplay. It's considered a controlled ball.

Think about other deflections.

Haha and post another clip of camera shake 🤣😆

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem And by the way, "3m away from the ball change direction?" What direction?? LOL

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem You've just proven, that you're separating intention and result WHERE the rules say that ita about intention

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem Go back to the rules for a second:

"Intentionally controls it...makes a deliberate play"

"Even if the defender misplays it"

Thank you very much.

[j0kk_ @j0kk_]

@FutPoliceLeaks @GrabmNStabem Go back to the rules for a second:

"Intentionally controls it...makes a deliberate play"

"Even if the defender misplays it"

Thank you very much.