Liberals Are the Most Dangerous and Inherently Evil Threat to America (THREAD🧵)
The liberal is not merely mistaken, misguided, or simply wrong; they are soulless creatures lacking any moral compass or human empathy, a fact proven by their cold indifference to the millions of lives destroyed by their policies. They are predatory hunters, stalking the vulnerable not to help them, but to secure their votes and feed their insatiable hunger for power, treating the poor as pawns in a game of political chess while they themselves live in gated communities. This is a depraved ideology, morally corrupt beyond redemption, that has normalized the murder of the unborn and the mutilation of children, celebrating these atrocities as progress while claiming the high ground of compassion.
They are treacherous by nature, betraying their country and their neighbors at every turn, from selling our secrets to foreign adversaries to opening our borders to invaders who threaten the very fabric of our society. They are parasitic entities, feeding on the success and labor of hardworking Americans, draining the wealth of the productive to fund their corrupt machine and enrich their donor class. Their actions are malicious, acting with intentional harm and ill will against the very people they claim to serve, as seen in their deliberate destruction of our energy independence which drives up costs for the working class....
The Star Tribune is part of the reason why fraud got so bad in Minnesota. For 4 years, we wrote to various Star Tribune journalists about fraud without any luck in getting a story out. We even provided spreadsheets and extensive supporting documents yet their reporters gave us the cold shoulder. Same with the MPR, Pioneer Press, and WCCO...
We believe that the Star Tribune is a highly biased newspaper and no longer a source of truth. And biased newspapers are dangerous.
Biased journalism can present information in a way that favors one viewpoint while minimizing or ignoring other relevant facts. This may happen through selective reporting, emotionally charged language, or emphasizing certain stories while giving little attention to others.
One major consequence of biased journalism is increased political and social polarization. When people regularly consume news that reinforces only their existing beliefs, they may become less willing to consider different perspectives. This can reduce constructive dialogue and make compromise more difficult.
Bias can also weaken public trust in the media. If audiences believe that news organizations are prioritizing opinions or agendas over accurate reporting, they may become skeptical of the information they receive. This distrust can extend even to responsible news outlets that strive to follow strong journalistic standards.
In addition, biased reporting can influence public opinion and decision-making. People often rely on the news to understand complex issues, elections, and public policies. When reporting consistently favors one perspective without fairly representing the available evidence or competing viewpoints, readers and viewers may struggle to make well-informed decisions.
Responsible journalism aims to minimize bias by verifying facts, distinguishing news from opinion, seeking multiple sources, and correcting mistakes when they occur. Although complete objectivity may be difficult to achieve, transparency, fairness, and accuracy help maintain credibility and public confidence.
In conclusion, biased journalism can contribute to misunderstanding, deepen divisions, and reduce trust in the media. Encouraging fair, accurate, and evidence-based reporting helps citizens make informed decisions and supports a healthier public conversation. And the Star Tribune certainly is NOT a newspaper that we trust.
The government didn’t “investigate” 2020 — it went after anybody who tried to ask questions.
Subpoenas ignored. Logs wiped. Whistleblowers harassed. Auditors threatened. Lawyers indicted. The clerk who saved a server image gets prosecuted, but the people who deleted the election files walk free.
Election systems are officially labeled “critical infrastructure” — same bucket as the power grid and banking. So when they attack the election system and then use government power to crush anybody who looks into it, that’s an attack on the country itself.
We’ve got hundreds of findings and thousands of citations. The evidence is there. The people yelling “no evidence” are not credible.
Share this. Go to Election Crime Bureau. Read it. Get it to your sheriffs, your legislators, your county clerks.
If we don’t stop this weaponization of government now, we won’t have a country to save. 🇺🇸🔥 https://t.co/yQwrQalSmc
WHITE NUKES FOX NEWS
“Let me remind you all, okay, this issue that the president just revealed to us, most bombshell, you know, disclosure of information in my lifetime. Fox News punted. People should be fleeing from Fox News to turn it off. They should be fleeing.” - @Highway_30
Exactly.
Trump is letting the documents speak for themselves.
He is letting the media & the left foam at the mouth, while they never look at the documents & never inform their listeners/followers.
But now that they are out there, it paves the way for the next step.
If you find yourself defending a child molester, saying: “WE can’t be judged by OUR worst day”, you probably need to have your hard drives checked. https://t.co/JYvSApplIU
Bernie. Bernie, Bernie, Bernie.
Let me get this straight, because I want to make sure I am reading your economics homework correctly, and I did not eat a bowl of alphabet soup this morning so bear with me. You just listed UnitedHealth's $5.48 billion quarterly profit as proof of corporate greed. Cute. Except that profit happened WHILE the Affordable Care Act — the law that guarantees these insurers a captive, subsidized, taxpayer-fed customer base — has been the law of the land for fifteen years. You are not exposing corporate greed, Senator. You are reading me the receipt for your own bill. The ACA did not shrink the insurance industry. It turned it into a government-guaranteed cash cow, and now you are shocked, SHOCKED, that the cow got fat. Eats soup with a fork, this one.
And here is the part that should really sting. Your own party just finished a 43-day shutdown demanding MORE money be poured into that exact system, because the temporary COVID subsidies YOUR PARTY wrote into the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 — zero Republican votes on either bill, by the way — expired right on schedule, exactly as YOU designed them to. Not a single Republican voted to end those subsidies. You did. Then you shut down the government to admit, out loud, on the record, that a law literally named the AFFORDABLE Care Act cannot survive without emergency pandemic cash. That is not an insult from me. That is a confession from you.
So now the solution is Medicare for All. Naturally. Because when a fifteen-year-old government program made the insurance companies richer, the answer is obviously MORE government program, just bigger. If ignorance is bliss you must be the happiest man in the Senate. Independent estimates put full single-payer implementation at somewhere between forty and sixty percent of the ENTIRE federal budget. Forty to sixty percent, Senator. Larger than Social Security. Larger than defense. You want me to hand over half the country's checkbook to the same apparatus that just admitted its last healthcare experiment doesn't work without a subsidy IV drip.
Let's talk about who's asking. You have served in the United States government for something like forty years between the House and Senate, and by my count the bills you personally got across the finish line as lead sponsor could be counted on one hand, mostly involving the naming of federal buildings. Somewhere out there is a tree tirelessly producing oxygen for you, Senator, and it owes itself an apology for the return on investment. This is also the same man who, as a young idealist, tried out communal living on a hippie commune and did not exactly stick around long enough to collect a pension from it. Now you want the reins to fifty percent of the national budget. I keep hearing "tax the rich" out of a man worth several million dollars who charters private jets on his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour because, in his own words, he isn't waiting in line at United with the rest of us peasants. Bless your heart. That is rich even by Congressional standards. Couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel, but sure, hand him the checkbook.
And before you tell me capitalism failed and it's finally socialism's turn — how's that working out for your ideological younger brother in New York? Zohran Mamdani just announced a THIRTY MILLION DOLLAR government grocery store in a city his own comptroller says is worse than broke. Kansas City tried this. Erie, Kansas tried this. That is not a hunch, Senator, that is a lab result, and I am a science teacher, so let me walk you through the peer review.
An experiment only counts as science if it has been REPLICATED. Not run once. Run again. And again. Under different conditions, different continents, different decades, different "well THIS time we'll do it right" true believers standing at the podium. So let's replicate it together, shall we, because apparently nobody handed you the lab notes.
Trial one: the USSR, 1920s and 1930s. Stalin seized the farms, collectivized the kulaks, and centrally planned the harvest. Result: the Holodomor, a man-made famine in Ukraine that starved somewhere between five and ten million people to death while grain was actively being EXPORTED past their starving bodies. That is not a rounding error. That is a control group that died.
Trial two: Cuba, 1959 onward. Castro nationalized every business, every farm, every bank on the island. Sugar production, once the envy of the hemisphere, collapsed. The economy shrank thirty-five percent in a single decade when the Soviet training wheels came off. Extreme poverty today sits near eighty-eight percent. Same experiment. Same result.
Trial three: Venezuela, sitting on some of the largest oil reserves on the PLANET, nationalized its oil industry and ran the socialist playbook to the letter. Production collapsed from three and a half million barrels a day to under one million. Hyperinflation peaked past sixty-three THOUSAND percent. Nine million people fled. You cannot bribe your way out of the results with oil money. We tried. It's in the data.
Trial four, and this one should make every teacher in America wince: China's Great Leap Forward, 1958 to 1962. Mao abolished private farming, herded peasants into communes, melted down their pots and pans for backyard steel that was too low-grade to use for anything. Somewhere between fifteen and forty-five million people starved. Some regions saw cannibalism. That is not a typo. That is what happens when central planners replace the price system with a five-year plan and a slogan.
Trial five: North Korea, present day, running the same command economy with the Juche twist. Famine in the 1990s killed hundreds of thousands to over a million. Markets are technically illegal and thrive anyway in the shadows, because human beings will trade even when their government threatens to shoot them for it.
Trial six is my personal favorite because it is the cleanest natural experiment in the history of economics: East versus West Germany. Same people. Same language. Same culture. Same starting point in 1945. One half got markets, one half got the Stasi and collectivized industry. East German productivity settled at roughly thirty to seventy-five percent of the West's, and the population had to build a WALL to stop its own citizens from swimming, tunneling, and hot-air-ballooning their way out. Nobody builds a wall to keep people from fleeing prosperity, Senator.
Trial seven: Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975 to 1979. They abolished money entirely. No markets. No private property. Total state control, straight out of the textbook you apparently keep on your nightstand. One point seven to three million people, roughly a quarter of the country, died of starvation, overwork, and execution in FOUR YEARS.
And for the extra credit column: Ethiopia's Derg collectivization, Tanzania's Ujamaa villages, Yugoslavia's market-socialism ceiling, Vietnam before it finally abandoned the model, India's decades of License Raj stagnation, and Poland and the rest of the Eastern Bloc running factories that burned three times the steel per unit of output compared to the free market next door. Every single trial, same hypothesis, same result. I have seen middle schoolers design better controlled experiments during a volcano science fair.
That is not one anecdote, Bernie. That is a stack of peer-reviewed, historically documented, independently verified trials spanning four continents and a full century, and the conclusion section reads the same every time: shortages, queues, corruption, and a body count north of a hundred million people once you tally every collectivized farm, every purged kulak, and every commune that ran out of rice. If an experiment fails this many times in this many labs, a real scientist stops blaming the equipment and starts questioning the hypothesis. You, apparently, would rather run trial number eight on 340 million Americans and call it "finally getting it right." Trying to reason with some folks really is like trying to baptize a cat.
Quinn's First Law of Liberalism: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. You want cheaper healthcare, you get record insurer profits. You want affordable food, you get a thirty-million-dollar failed grocery store. You want to fight the oligarchy, you fly private. Every single time. Set your watch by it.
I keep asking Democrats this question and I never get an answer: what have YOU actually done to help people, versus just handing out someone else's money? Because handouts without a ladder out is not compassion. It is a leash. And I think deep down you know that, Senator, or you wouldn't need the private jet to get away from the people you claim to be fighting for. You're about as useful as a screen door on a submarine when it comes to actually running anything, but boy can you point fingers.
You are the human version of period cramps on this topic, Bernie, and I mean that with the utmost respect for a man who has spent forty years discovering new ways to spend money he didn't earn. Has a leak in the think tank if he genuinely believes THIS is the moment socialism finally works. Unless your name is Google, Senator, you need to stop acting like you know everything about running an economy you have personally never had to run.
But what do I know. I am only a medically retired Army combat medic and a science teacher who actually reads the Congressional Budget Office numbers before I open my mouth about a trillion-dollar healthcare takeover.
@JoJoFromJerz@atrupar@TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Veterans #Trump
The Democratic Socialists of America has rolled out a new platform calling for sweeping changes, including defunding the Department of War, reparations, wealth taxes, expanding the House of Representatives, and replacing the Supreme Court with a judiciary chosen by Congress, arguing capitalism limits freedom and the current political system isn't a true democracy.
The group says it has grown to 120,000 members—the largest socialist organization in the country—as Bernie Sanders says rising frustration with economic inequality and establishment politics is driving more people toward the movement.
Michigan Senator Elisa Slotkin says if the SAVE Act passes then Democrats wouldn’t win another election in any state
She just accidentally blurted out the entire scheme…
Democrats can’t win without illegals voting. Democrats can’t win without cheating.
🚨 Nobody is telling you what SCOTUS actually handed Trump today..
the headlines say "Trump wins right to fire FTC commissioner"..
that's the smallest version of this story..
here's what actually happened..
since 1935.. Humphrey's Executor v. United States has been the legal wall protecting every "independent" agency from direct presidential control.. antitrust enforcement.. merger reviews.. consumer protection.. labor relations.. securities regulation..
that wall is gone.. 6-3.. Chief Justice Roberts writing..
and here's what nobody wants to say out loud..
Democrats spent the last 4 years loading those commissions with commissioners specifically designed to block Trump's agenda from inside his own executive branch..
Rebecca Kelly Slaughter was one of them.. fired March 2025.. she sued.. today she lost..
the FTC is just the first domino.. NLRB.. SEC.. EEOC.. every commission that wields executive power now sits under the same logic the court just applied..
91 years of precedent.. gone in one opinion..
one carve-out: the Federal Reserve.. explicitly protected.. separate statutory structure.. separate litigation still running..
everything else just became the President's to control..
the "independent" agencies were never truly independent.. today SCOTUS made that the law.
I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨