@EdKrassen@maurice_lippy I agree, but it isn’t working. Maybe God is not the answer, but I think people need a sense of objective morality. Many argue that we have this innately (everyone understands what is right and wrong), however the evidence of such is lacking and makes the argument unconvincing.
@wideawake_media Let say, for the sake of the argument that he and all you wackos are right - humans aren’t causing the warming. Even with that granted, we still have a major climate crisis on our hands - biodiversity loss, soil degradation, pollution, eutrophication, all of which humans cause.
@PatOfLancs@FromKulak Ya campaign financing and the like can be messy. However, one can argue that the scheme we have employed engages a wide variety of stakeholders. Through their donations and investments their voice and ideals can be recognized by the powers that be and acted upon.
@PatOfLancs@FromKulak You would have to have an insane amount of money as a third party to contend within the current two party system. Many have tried and failed.
@PatOfLancs@NuckChorris16 I don’t know if that’s the case. I think physicalism says we should not be able to subjectively experience things, and deny the presence of qualia. Physicalists don’t deny sense perception, but hold that all consciousness is just the brain.