jc_jb

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@EBL2017 Nearly clawed it back with zero shots on target ?

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@bmsquantum @TouchlineX That a dive should be a yellow

[Gym Workout | Strength Training | Clean Form @Grind4Gainzz]

Shoulder Press Mistakes

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@TouchlineX If only it was ezalzouli 😒

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@ishowspeedsui What were you expecting bro you think they’re Morocco? 😂😂😂😂

[Shahmīr @shahmir69420]

Section: “The right to name a child belongs to the father and not the mother.”

ʾImām ʾIbn Al-Qayyim:

❝This is something about which there is no dispute among the people.❞

[Shahmīr @shahmir69420]

Adh-Dhahabī ash-Shāfiʿī mentions:

“It is upon a woman that she must also maintain modesty before her husband, lower her gaze in his presence, obey what he commands, remain silent when he speaks, stand when he arrives, and avoid everything that angers him…

1/3

[Mordecai 🇳🇱 @mordecai_1m]

“Bukhari came 200 years later” argument died today.

This supports the Islamic Isnad system even more:

[Deen @Deenresponds]

🚨‼️A Monumental Modern Discovery: This inscription is remarkable because it independently attests the title “Dhū al-Janāḥayn” for Jaʿfar ibn Abī Ṭālib, the same title found in Sahih al-Bukhari 3709.

The inscription reflects contemporary usage by a freed slave named Walid who was freed by Jaafars son.

This suggests that this honorific title was genuinely known among early Muslims. It is a small but tangible example of archaeological evidence aligning with and corroborating details preserved in the hadith tradition and it won’t be the last of its kind.

The inscription translates as follows:

“I am al-Walīd, the freedman of ʿAbdullāh ibn Jaʿfar, son of Jaʿfar the Two-Winged. May my Lord forgive me and have mercy on me.”

[Ibn Owaīss @IbnOwaiss]

Mohammad Hijab is now finally showing his true colors for everyone to see.
To respond to his so called ‘Najdi Fork’

➠ The answer is no, the Mujadid Al-Imām Mohammad Ibn Abd Al-Wahab (رحمه الله) would not make Takfīr in the Muslim rulers of today.

The reason for this, is that the S͟hayk͟h (رحمه الله) is from the furthest people when it comes to extremism in Takfīr to the point that he would only Takfīr on matters there is the clearest of consensus on (Refer to: Al-Durar Al-Saniyah 1/102).

Sh. ʿAbdul Latif B. Abd Al Rahman Ibn Hassan said: “[…] and Al-S͟hayk͟h Mohammad (Ibn Abd Al Wahab) May Aḷḷāh have mercy on him, is not hasty rather the most cautious when it comes to excommunication (Takfīr), to the point where he was not certain in declaring the ignorant who calls upon other than Aḷḷāh at the graves a Kafir. (Minhāj al-Taʾsīs 3/99).

We also know that Takfīr on the rulers is only done with a clear cut Kufr as in the ḥadīṯh. So it is for you to imagine how cautious the S͟hayk͟h would treat such a matter. This includes all the matters which you’ve mentioned (Muwala, Halimiyah, Udhr bil Jahl).

The S͟hayk͟h (رحمه الله) said: “As for what the opposition have mentioned about me, that I do Takfīr with uncertainty or by alliance (Muwala), or that I Takfīr the Jahil whom the proofs have not been established against, this is without a doubt a clear accusation in which they wish to stray the people away from the deen of Aḷḷāh”. (Compilation of his works 3/14)

This statement is as clear as it can get, as if the S͟hayk͟h (رحمه الله) is responding to you directly.

Lastly, it should be mentioned that the Ottomans were the first to excommunicate the S͟hayk͟h and his people, not that the S͟hayk͟h initiated it to act like he is some blood thirsty terrorist. He established their Takfir based on evidence and caution (as mentioned) unlike the opposition, which is a known fact. He also did not ally with anyone to fight them, this is simply baseless.

So there is your little ‘thorn’ vaporized .

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@hosgrave @AminSoussi3 @SapienceOrg Saying that a Muslim is a Jew or from another faith is literally takfir. Subhanallah I’ve heard it all now. I hope you are ready to meet Allah when he asks about your “mocking” of a brother accusing him of being from another faith. May Allah guide you.

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@hosgrave @AminSoussi3 @SapienceOrg Calling Faris, who is a Muslim a Rabbi, who is a Jewish leader isn’t takfir ?

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@hosgrave @AminSoussi3 @SapienceOrg Issue is with donkeys like yourself, is one, you make takfir of someone without the hujjah, meaning that as per the prophet, whoever makes takfir unjustly comes back to him.
Secondly, the video itself shows donkey number 2 Dedew slandering the prophet. You're still defending him?

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@hosgrave @AminSoussi3 @SapienceOrg It doesn’t come as a surprise that an ikhwani donkey like yourself, follows another donkey like Dedew who slanders the prophet ! May Allah guide you away from your deviance. Read the books of the salaf before embarrassing yourself.

https://t.co/G06oUJBVUX

[Hikmah Publications @hikmahpubs]

Separating Muhammad b. Abd al-Wahhab from Ibn Taymiyyah: A Smokescreen

Sapience is showing its true colours.

It no longer feels the need to conceal its hostility towards those who adhere to the Salafi creed, despite its repeated false claims of promoting unity.

Whether this shift is driven by financial backing from Sufi interests in Turkey and elsewhere, or simply the unmasking of Hamza Tzortzis’ corrupt positions, the outcome is the same.

إذا عُرِفَ السَّبَبُ بَطَلَ العَجَبُ

“Once the reason is known, there is no longer any cause for surprise.”

Historically, many of those who target Muhammad b. Abd al-Wahhab also target Ibn Taymiyyah. The issue is not their personalities, but the creed and methodology they championed.

One of the oldest tactics is to isolate and discredit influential figures who carried the same message. Once one is demonised, it becomes easier to attack the next. The real objective is not the individual, but the message they all shared.

The proof is plain. Hijab ridiculed the Salaf for their affirmation of Allah’s Attributes, yet praises individuals whose deviations in these very matters have been documented by numerous scholars, among them Ibn Taymiyyah.

The target is not merely certain scholars; it is the creed they represented.

Wake up!

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@5amrevival akhi what do you fill it up with if you don’t have access to sand? Are they bought empty ?

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@SapienceOrg Wallahi brother Shamsi was right about you years ago when he said your mission is to spread doubts and misconceptions about Salafis. I used to think he was exaggerating but he’s right! Perfect example is that filthy slanderous channel SP files you used to contribute to.

[jc_jb @67wbcsami]

@FRMFXtra I think considering his quality, having him back in the round of 16 would be a great boost. So it’s a good idea. We just need to qualify inshallah

[Fathers Diary @Fathers_Diary]

Man to man