@ColinPClarke Hmm 🤔 I see her point, but AQ’s strength was always the franchise model with a flexible adaptive narrative. Naturally, that makes it hard to centralize, but it avoids the brittleness of narratives like the Islamic State’s. Her core thesis can be demonstrably true and false.
@ITAAirways said “not possible to fly internationally round trip for less than $700” - well, we managed it the month earlier just fine. ITA error? Be ready to lose money 💰
Booked a round trip #flight on @ITAAirways - paid for it, flew across the #Atlantic and now they inform me I don’t have a return flight. Claim no supervisor exists when I call. #scumbag#lies#airline#scam? Cost me $750 😢
@CTCWP@NCITE_COE interesting juxtaposition of definitions and categories - definitely worth a long-read this weekend. Curious how Salafi-Jihadis were parsed to avoid doubling the AGAAVE-RMVE numbers.
I'd like to comment on the uselessness of this AI article but it's as useful as most academic work these days. However, it does indicate perhaps we need to look more deeply into issues that've plagued humanity for thousands of years rather than merely publishing without purpose
@hoffman_bruce @sara_harmouch unlike factions like the Taliban and Islamic State, AQ has crafted a far more resilient narrative. It’s not as dynamic as IS’s, but is also less brittle as theirs proved to be. Not as ethnocentric as the Taliban, so less constrained by geographies.
@ZaknafeinDC If we believed war was immoral, Bradley never would’ve been sent. That said, we’d also wage war far differently if we truly believed war was, or could be, moral 🤷🏻♂️
@combatmeatball Has anyone chimed in with “the most painful and soul sucking job in the military” caution?
I’ve never done it, but when I asked the same question you did, the former PAOs in my network started rioting 😜