Kadmon 78

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

BSV --> All of it

[Grayscale @Grayscale]

Every asset has its narrative:

$BTC → Digital money
$ETH → World Computer
$XRP → Global payments
$SOL → High performance
$HYPE → Onchain trading 24/7
$LINK → Tokenization & oracles
$SUI → Next gen infrastructure
$AVAX → Mass customization

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@f_schaeffler Gold? WTF.
Bitcoin is a digital cash system. Read the whitepaper Mr. Schäffler

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@Mailandplate @ruidasilva @Brrr98or @TFTC21 sorry to interrupt your wet dreams, but only 2-3 btc nodes are needed.

[Ketones Not Glucose @GlucoseNot]

The whitepaper Bitcoin!!
#BSV 2030

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@AlfredoMorenoSS @PhotoKuro_ bsv IS bitcoin.

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@WattInduction @CsTominaga https://t.co/BkWIso7nBf

[Captain @CaptainBSV]

Craig has killed Satoshi as intended. All part of the 5D chess moves planned from the start.

It’s time we rename Sats to Craigs 💪

BSV is BitCoin 💯🔥💯🔥💯🔥

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@NSKinsella @CsTominaga

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@BHatooor13304 Satoshi saved bitcoin
https://t.co/fuV3J1IpIu

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

As a PoC - It is up.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

Because I didn't fork anything.
BTC changed the protocol. BSV restored and preserved the original rules.
Starting a new chain with a new genesis block would have created a different system, not Bitcoin.
The entire point was continuity of the existing ledger, existing transactions, existing ownership records, and the protocol as originally designed.
If you create a new genesis block, you are creating a new asset.
Bitcoin was already running. The objective was not to invent a replacement. It was to keep the original system operating under the original rules.
The real fork occurred when others changed the protocol. Preserving the protocol is not a fork. Changing it is.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

I have all the bits up.

Now I am doing the ugly part: getting the bugs out.

My wife is over in Singapore for family matters and she gets back tomorrow, so it is probably going to be a late night. That is fine. The code does not care about sleep, marriage, time zones, or human weakness. It just sits there, broken in quiet little places, waiting to be beaten into shape.

I want this running standalone.

That means wallet functionality, seed saving, the whole thing. Electrum-grade, not some toy with a pretty interface and the structural integrity of wet cardboard.

And yes, it takes longer than one wants.

I am also going back to .NET.

I do not give a fuck about the fashionable little parade of Go and whatever else everyone is pretending is the future this week. I am old. I like C++. I like C#.

So I am going back to my old way of coding.

It worked before the children arrived with stickers on their laptops, and it will work now.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

世界各国的政府都充满了废话、野心家，以及把权力当成宗教的人。

这一点并不新鲜。

从古罗马到今天，追逐权力的人往往比创造价值的人更喜欢站在台前。

不过，有一件事这些年让我印象颇深。

当我研究一些中国以及其他国家领导人的履历时，我发现其中不少人并非一开始就待在首都的办公室里发表宏大理论。

他们曾经在地方工作过。

管理过县、市、省。

处理过洪水、收成、基础设施、预算、工厂、粮食供应，以及各种现实世界的问题。

他们知道农田长什么样。

知道道路为什么会坏。

知道统计数字背后是活生生的人。

这一点很重要。

因为许多人一辈子都在谈论经济，却从未创造过任何东西。

谈论农业，却从未种过任何东西。

谈论企业，却从未经营过任何东西。

谈论劳动，却从未真正劳动过。

他们对现实的理解来自报告。

而不是来自现实。

我经常开玩笑说，我在自己的研究中“扮演农民”。

事实上我确实如此。

我种植作物，研究灌溉，计算产量，观察天气，处理病虫害。

这并不是因为我需要种几颗南瓜来养活自己。

而是因为如果一个人想理解制度、经济、激励和资源配置，那么偶尔离开书本和会议室是有益的。

土地不会在乎你的意识形态。

植物不会阅读你的论文。

天气也不会因为你的政治立场而改变。

现实世界有一种令人耳目一新的诚实。

它不会给任何人特殊待遇。

而这恰恰是许多职业政治家最缺乏的老师。

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

I am working toward releasing an open-source AI agent project by the end of this year.

The aim is not to build another monolithic system competing in the usual “OpenAI versus Claude versus Gemini” framing. That model assumes that intelligence should be concentrated into a small number of enormous general-purpose systems operated from large data centres. I think there is another path.

The project will explore an open environment of many specialized agents: individually trained, task-specific, economically accountable systems that can be created, improved, and owned by different people. Rather than one model attempting to do everything, the architecture is based on distributed knowledge, specialization, reputation, and competition.

In this model, agents may be trained for narrow domains: law, medicine, engineering, accounting, software, research, education, logistics, personal assistance, verification, translation, and many others. Individuals or small teams could train agents around their own knowledge and experience. Those agents could then be paid for useful work, develop reputations, and compete on accuracy, reliability, cost, and trustworthiness.

The goal is to create a market for specialized intelligence rather than a single centralized intelligence provider.

This is about open-source AI as an ecosystem: many agents, many owners, many areas of expertise, and many routes to improvement. It is not intended to replace human knowledge with one giant black box. It is intended to let human knowledge be embedded, trained, tested, traded, and extended through specialized systems.

The project will invite developers, researchers, domain experts, and individuals who want to build agents around real expertise. The important question is not which large company owns the most powerful model. The important question is how millions of smaller, specialized systems can cooperate, compete, verify one another, and create value in an open environment.

That is the direction I intend to pursue.

[Truth_Machine @cryptorebel_SV]

#Bitcoin #BSV is a locked in stone system as Satoshi envisioned. But here is the reality, barely anyone uses it. The price is $13, exchanges delisted. While small it is easy for people to come in and change the protocol. #BitcoinSV will never be locked in stone until it succeeds.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

Call me a fraud if you wish.

Call me a liar.

Call me delusional.

Call me whatever makes you feel comfortable.

The interesting thing is that none of those words matter once the code exists.

For years, many people have focused on stopping me, discrediting me, attacking me, censoring me, misrepresenting me, and preventing anything I was working on from ever seeing the light of day.

At one stage that may have worked.

At one stage much of this existed only in my head, in notebooks, in designs, in unfinished code, in prototypes, in ideas that had not yet become reality.

Ideas can be delayed.

Ideas can be suppressed.

Ideas can be ridiculed.

What becomes much harder to stop is a working system.

This month the code goes public.

Not a promise.

Not a roadmap.

Not a marketing presentation.

Code.

Working systems.

Architectures.

Protocols.

Implementations.

People will be free to inspect it, analyse it, criticise it, improve it, fork it, extend it, or ignore it.

That choice will belong to them.

The thing that many people seem unable to understand is that I am not asking anyone for money.

I am not selling access.

I am not selling licences.

I am not selling permission.

I am not creating a gatekeeper.

I am releasing it.

Free.

The irony is that this is the part many people will find hardest to believe.

Not the cryptography.

Not the distributed threshold systems.

Not the digital possession model.

Not the ability to create truly scarce digital goods.

The hardest thing for many people to understand is that after spending years building it, I am simply giving it away.

And that is why it is already too late to stop.

A secret can be suppressed.

An unpublished idea can be buried.

A prototype can be hidden.

A public implementation cannot be uninvented.

Once the code exists in the open, it belongs to history.

From that point onward, the question is no longer whether it can be stopped.

The question becomes what the world chooses to build with it.

[Light @LightBSV]

Tufty the Cat getting smacked around by Ira Kleiman over simple truths wasn't on my 2026 bingo card, but I'll take it. The enemies of Bitcoin are starting to fight each other. Incredible discordance on display and in action.

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@tuftythecat @commandersaki It is ok if you think so.

[Ira Kleiman @Kleiman1933]

@tuftythecat I acknowledge a personal memory is weak evidence standing alone. But multiple independent witnesses, documented timelines, and a federal jury verdict don’t all point the same direction by coincidence.

[Ira Kleiman @Kleiman1933]

@tuftythecat Are they still claiming my brother never heard of Bitcoin in his whole life?

A book that gets that basic fact wrong, despite overwhelming documented evidence to the contrary, isn’t research. It’s fiction

[Kadmon 78 @78Kadmon]

@tuftythecat @Kleiman1933