Monitor crime and safety in San Francisco with real-time SFPD police dispatch on https://t.co/vY9D8VAwsR
Last on scene mapping playback, filter and sort dispatches, arrest statistics and response times. Code generated by AI using public transparency data. Unaffiliated with SF.
@NewtBurp@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie Exclude. The screenshot showing the boundary crossing Marina Safeway parking lot and across Buchanan has been the public map on DataSF for years. On Oct 23, 2026 it was updated to exclude the whole area despite SF DPW and SF Sewer operating on the understanding it is SF Port.
@wmf68@MHurabiell No. All items stated are facts. If you read the full post, the City Departments are OPERATING with the understanding this area is under SF Port jurisdiction including SF DPW (in writing see screenshot) and SF Sewer contractors who in July 2026 obtained permits from SF Port.
@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie SF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DISAVOWED 3700 BUCHANAN ST (ENTRANCE TO SAFEWAY) FROM THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO PAVE THE BLOCK AND EVEN RATE THE BLOCK IN YEARLY PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX STATING IT IS SF PORT JURISDICTION. THIS IS WHY THE BLOCK WAS CRUMBLING AND NOT PAVED IN 20 YEARS.
@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie WHY DID MICHAEL O'SHAUGHNESSY CONSTRUCTION NEED TO OBTAIN PERMITS FROM SF PORT IN JULY 2026 AT MARINA BLVD / BUCHANAN IF IT IS NOT SF PORT JURISDICTION? WHY DO THEY NEED SF PORT PERMISSION FOR NO PARKING SIGNS BUT SAFEWAY CAN BUILD A 22 STORY BUILDING WITHOUT CONSULTING THE PORT?
@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie "Any development on Port land requires Port Commission approval, separate from SF Planning. The applicant filed under SB 330 to lock in planning code requirements, but Port jurisdiction operates outside the normal Planning Code framework, potentially undermining that protection"
@laura_waxee@sfchronicle SCOOP: SF PLANNING HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER SF PORT JURISDICTION SO SF OFFICIALS REDREW THE SF PORT JURISDICTION 2 WEEKS BEFORE SF PLANNING "APPROVED" THE MARINA SAFEWAY 22 STORY BUILDING CONSPIRING TO CIRCUMVENT LEGALITIES OF SF PORT AUTHORITY AND ZONING.
https://t.co/3RaryzvYOd
@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie Why was the SF Port Jurisdiction updated on Oct 23, 2026 2 weeks before the SF Planning approved the 22 story building at the Marina Safeway? Who changed the jurisdiction boundary and why? If it's SF Port, then SF Planning has no jurisdiction, that is why.
@LoveCodeTrade It's on SF Port Jurisdiction - City Officials knew it, and 2 weeks before approving the plans, redrew the SF Port Jurisdiction to get around the legalities of building on SF Port and help the developer push through the plans. It’s a fact, it's SF Port.
https://t.co/552wEYnNeE
@abc7newsbayarea It's on SF Port Jurisdiction - City Officials knew it, and 2 weeks before approving the plans, redrew the SF Port Jurisdiction to get around the legalities of building on SF Port and help the developer push through the plans. It’s a fact, it's SF Port.
https://t.co/552wEYnNeE
@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie BOTTOM LINE: 22 STORY BUILDING CANNOT BE BUILT BECAUSE THE MARINA SAFEWAY IS IN SF PORT JURISDICTION AND BY CITY OFFICIALS UPDATING THE PORT MAP 2 WEEKS BEFORE APPROVING DEVELOPER PLANS SHOWS CLEAR CORRUPTION TO CIRCUMVENT THE LEGALITIES OF BUILDING ON SF PORT JURISDICTION.
@SusanDReynolds@MHurabiell@KTVU@kron4news@abc7newsbayarea@scsherrill@DanielLurie FURTHER EVIDENCE SAFEWAY IS SF PORT JURISDICTION THERE IS NO PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) SCORE FOR 3700 BUCHANAN WHICH DPW REFUSED TO RESURFACE BECAUSE IT IS SF PORT. ALSO JULY SEWER CREWS OBTAINED NO PARKING SIGNS FOR MARINA BLVD/BUCHANAN FROM THE SF PORT.
@SFPD@USAO_NDCA 7 arrests in 2 years for selling fentanyl, heroin, crack and meth. Zero paraphernalia. Pro dealer. 100% selling charges; 11351/11352 (fentanyl), 11351.5 (crack), 11378 (meth).
SF Judge continues to OR San Francisco drug dealer FRANKLIN LAINEZ RODRIGUEZ arrested 4 times by @SFPD in July, Aug, Sept, Oct for selling fentanyl, crack and meth after May jail time for 2024/2025 conviction totaling 7 arrests in 2 years in TL and 6th/Mission. @USAO_NDCA
@SFPD@USAO_NDCA Location and details of his 4 arrests in 4 months in TL and 6th/Mission. As soon as he was released from jail, he was arrested for selling drugs on July 1st violating probation. Judge gave ankle monitor, released him. FTA, bench warrants, Sheriff warrants, continued selling.
Real-Time data rolling 48 hours shows 7:55 min median @SFPD response time for Priority A City Wide when calling 911. Slowest stations ranked per Priority. Check your Police Station response times for Priority A, B and C at https://t.co/ygsu6Lh5pO
@war24182236 This is after @SFPD arrested 22 San Francisco drug dealers within a block of here in Oct 2026 - the most of any SF location that month. The SF Judge then releases the drug dealers charged with 11352, selling fentanyl, from jail 3 days later. @DanielLurie@SFDAOffice@USAO_NDCA