arlie a

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@jfkinexile A

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@elonmuskTRENDSX 100%

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@GioBruno1600 Truth, if it ever comes out

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@MTGrepp Yes

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@realTrumpNewsX Yes

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@TulsiGabbardrep Yes

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@TulsiGabbardrep Safe

[arlie a @AArlieace]

@elonmusk Comm check… copy 5x5

[Angel @AngelStudiosInc]

People have been so generous in spreading the message of 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 that they've Paid It Forward so thousands of others can watch it for free in theaters. Get your tickets today!

[Harold Hutchison @HaroldHutchison]

'He Himself Had The Contacts': Josh Hawley Slams Biden Admin's Response To Hunter Allegations As 'Total Lie' @DailyCaller

https://t.co/WVblNE4sYy

[Dan Bongino @dbongino]

Today is July 5th, and Joe Biden is the WORST president in US history.

[Kayleigh McEnany @kayleighmcenany]

Among many shocking facts alleged in the lawsuit exposing egregious suppression of speech by the federal government, is the allegation that the Biden administration requested to censor @RobertKennedyJr in January of 2021:

"On January 23, 2021, three days after President Biden took office, Clarke Humphrey ('Humphrey'), who at the time was the Digital Director for the COVID-19 Response Team, emailed Twitter and requested the removal of an anti-COVID-19 vaccine tweet by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.21 Humphrey sent a copy of the email to Rob Flaherty ('Flaherty'), former Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Digital Strategy, on the email and asked if 'we can keep an eye out for tweets that fall in this same genre.' The email read, 'Hey folks-Wanted to flag the below tweet and am wondering if we can get moving on the process of having it removed ASAP.'"
https://t.co/OAD9ntcQQV

[Republicans @Republicans]

Have a safe and happy July 4th tomorrow!

[Franklin Graham @Franklin_Graham]

Did you know that God loves you?

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16)

[Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11]

Based on nearly ever metric, across all regions and age groups, when the left gets control of education, standards drop, test scores plummet, and students are hurt.

It's the left that is pushing to abolish AP and honors classes because of "racism.”

It's the left that wants to abolish ACT and SAT scores from being used in college admissions because of "racism.”

It's the left-controlled teacher unions which kept schools closed during COVID leading to a historic collapse in test scores.

It's the left that pushes sexually explicit content and radical gender ideology into our schools.

It's the left that won't let teachers punish misbehaving students, turning entire classrooms into little more than dangerous zoos.

We should not be surprised that they are now hellbent on defying SCOTUS's anti-affirmative action ruling in their war on merit and excellence.

The left will always misdiagnose the real problems in education, rejecting actual solutions in favor of fake ones that make things worse at 4x the cost.

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

Twitter is an amazing place. As crazy as the postings can be, if you’re familiar with patterns and algorithms and political party bots, you can easily identify trends. So, this looks to be the left’s plan:

a) Continue the unrelenting assault on the one true outsider to the swamp. Cripple him in slow motion with a thousand cuts, because to destroy him in one violent blow would confer martyrdom.

b) Neuter any viable substitute genuinely conservative candidate. The sudden flurry of classic DNC talking point attacks against DeSantis have all the earmarks of the commie playbook. So obvious, they’re boring.

c) Coddle the usual “hands-across-the aisle” RINO sucker fish like Romney, et al.

Why? Because there is only one trough and all these political hogs slop at it side by side. Donald Trump’s election was NEVER supposed to happen. Hillary’s hubris fumbled an easy walk to the goal line, and all hell broke loose - the corruption, the child trafficking, the globalist payoffs, all of it was exposed. Now BOTH sides of the uniparty can’t wait to get it back to the comfortable swamp where they can slither around together in happy denizen heaven, making deals, getting rich, and swapping mistresses and pool boys.

[Brigitte Gabriel @ACTBrigitte]

Should Republican prosecutors indict Hunter and Joe Biden as retribution for the left's attacks on Trump?
https://t.co/LNNpjKvViT

[Lauren Boebert @laurenboebert]

If there was an FD-1023 on President Trump that had even half the allegations that the one on Biden has, we’d be in the midst of impeachment proceedings.

There are two standards of justice in our country and that is not a secret.

[Tom Fitton @TomFitton]

Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for records disclosing the names of staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office on two investigations targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans (Judicial Watch Inc. v U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:23-cv-01485)).

@JudicialWatch filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the Justice Department rejected a December 9, 2022, FOIA request for staff rosters or similar records that would identify the names of employees in the Office of Special Counsel Jack Smith.

The Justice Department responded on April 12, stating that records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request have been located, but are being withheld “pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(A)” of FOIA:

Exemption 6 pertains to information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Exemption 7(A) pertains to records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, the release of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.

Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith in November to take over two investigations involving Trump, who is running for president in 2024.

The first investigation involves Trump’s handling of classified documents he retained at his Mar-a-Lago, Florida, residence after leaving the White House in January 2021.

The second investigation regards Trump’s challenge of the 2020 presidential election results, which allegedly included a plan to submit separate slates of electors to block Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory.

Garland named Smith to the position three days after Trump announced he would run for president again in 2024. Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them.

“Given the overwhelming evidence of anti-Trump bias disclosed in the Durham Report, it is urgent that Americans be able to find out who is again investigating Trump from the Garland Justice Department and his appointee Jack Smith,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Special Prosecutor Jack Smith isn’t above the law, and the American people have the right to know about just who is working on his unprecedented and politicized anti-Trump investigation.”

Through FOIA, Judicial Watch uncovered information about Special Counsel’s Mueller’s budget and staff. Judicial Watch also sued for and obtained records for the budget of Special Counsel John Durham. A Judicial Watch lawsuit also uncovered calendar entries of Mueller special counsel prosecutor Andrew Weissmann showed he led the hiring effort for the investigation that targeted President Trump.

(In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Government officials were looking to step up a probe into requests for tax-exemption from organizations with conservative sounding names like “Tea Party” and other “political sounding names,” according to a later report by the Treasury Department’s inspector general. Smith appears to have been a key player in this attempt to silence conservative voices.

(According to the documents obtained by Judicial Watch, Smith directed the head of the Justice Department’s Election Crimes Branch, Richard Pilger, to meet with the director of the IRS’s Tax-Exempt Organizations division, Lois Lerner. In one email obtained by Judicial Watch, Lerner discusses an idea that the Justice Department could build “false-statement cases” against tax-exempt conservative groups.

(Judicial Watch later obtained additional documents detailing a planning meeting between Justice Department, FBI and IRS officials about possible criminal prosecutions. Thanks to Judicial Watch disclosures, House investigators discovered that the IRS improperly turned over confidential tax records of non-profit organizations to the FBI—sparking a public uproar and forcing the return of the records to the IRS.)