@SStarmeroid@thomasforth Those bags don't count, it's a blend mixed with tea grown in India.
You need the pure collection. Just £50/11g I don't understand why more people don't buy it.
https://t.co/GYBqyYrxny
My wish for the next election is that poll trackers look like the one on the right 👉 not the left
This was yet another election where the polling showed it could easily go either way, but most of the charts just showed two nice clean lines, one leading and one trailing. Bad!
I was pretty sure the bias would be lower this election, would be interesting if it now effectively zero.
Maybe if the advantage does totally flip it may be possible to get rid of the electoral college eventually. Though that's much easier said than done.
@The_Ice_Creamy It's in part by election rules being able to differ state by state too, so postal votes done even need to arrive on election day, just postmarked
If you know you don't even have the votes, why count quickly? Especially if you're California and you know your states called early
Just to clarify: this isn’t just the first time since WW2 that all incumbent parties in developed countries lost vote share.
It’s the first time since this data was first recorded in 1905. Essentially the first time in the history of democracy (universal suffrage began in 1894).
Meanwhile, in Berlin, the German government has just collapsed.
The Chancellor Olaf Scholz has confirmed he will seek a confidence motion in the new year to trigger a snap general election.
Starmer’s Labour may quickly find itself pretty lonely on the social democratic front…
At her first #PMQs as Leader of the Opposition, @KemiBadenoch claimed Labour’s Autumn Budget “did not even mention defence”.
This isn’t correct. Defence spending was referred to multiple times in the Budget document and also in the chancellor’s speech. https://t.co/FV9toE1lur
Trump becomes the oldest president ever inaugurated.
The first president elected for a non-consecutive term since Grover Cleveland.
The only president re-elected after a successful impeachment, let alone two.
The only president to be convicted of a crime, then re-elected.
My general rule "If there's a polling error is will likely be in the opposite direction of conventional wisdom".
Meaning I currently expect (far from certain) any polling error to benefit Labour.
It's good to try and improve, but that can end up baking in incorrect assumptions.
Yes shut down polling because it was broadly correct and the models build on it suggested this outcome was one of the likeliest...
But no we should rely on the entirely soft data which made people think "the polls are wrong Harris will beat them"
You spend months saying "there are thousands of different combinations that could happen!" and then the result is literally the most common one https://t.co/DqhfT1b2eF