🔥🔥Wow. Our article is published! @BradSpellberg 🎉🔥🔥
A journey that started with a simple question: What’s in a name?
Today, I’m incredibly grateful to see our article published in @CMIComms :
“What’s in a Name? The Rise of Klebsiella pneumoniae: From Friedländer to Klebs”
This is my first publication as first author, and having this journey with my mentor, co-author, and friend, Dr. Spellberg, makes this milestone even more special.
K. pneumoniae is an organism I deal with almost every day—often as a notorious MDR pathogen. Writing this article gave me the opportunity to step back from the daily clinical challenge and explore the fascinating story behind its name.
From Friedländer → Klebs → K.pneumoniae.
Alhamdulillah. 🤲🏻
EnJoy!
#IDXposts
https://t.co/uDB9UsL53S
Notably, the patient had no history of colonization by S. maltophilia prior to the culture of PA-NM-086. L2 is a chromosomal class A serine β-lactamase in S. maltophilia . Hence, it is less likely to be readily transferred across species than the genes encoded on plasmids, which may explain why blaL2 was identified in only a handful of P. aeruginosa genomes. Both P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia are ubiquitous environmental organisms found in soil, plant material, rivers, lakes, and streams and are cultured from individuals with cystic fibrosis , which may offer opportunities for genetic exchange
Super interesting 👀😎
🆕💥🟢L2 β-lactamase , a serine-based class A β-lactamases expressed by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, contributes to ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
The authors report a novel mechanism of C/T resistance in P. aeruginosa partially mediated by an L2 β-lactamase independently of its canonical regulator, AmpRL2.
Additional studies are needed to better understand the processes that select for the transfer of resistance genes between P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia. #idxposts https://t.co/Y4d3NyMazM
🆕💥 Beyond Approval: Finding the Right Place for Emerging Gram-Negative Antibiotics
Does US FDA approval tell us where a drug belongs in practice?
Not necessarily.
A great piece by @drgabx asking 3 important questions:
🎯 What unmet need does it address?
📊 What does the evidence actually support?
🛡️ How should stewardship guide its use?
Novelty is not synonymous with necessity. Stewardship should keep pace with—not outrun—the evidence.
https://t.co/kkLjrdWOFj #IDXposts
This is an excellent infographic ,a summary of the beta-lactamase inhibitors reviewed in the new @SIDPharm#Breakpoints episode "Beta-lactamase inhibitors: Scientifically elegant, just complex."
Link to podcast: EnJoy! https://t.co/b3bkwBRDkm
#idxposts#bookmark
@PulmCrit@ABsteward@BraedonMcdonald is leading some very interesting research on this.
Patients with candida show higher rates of bacterial VAP, suggesting that it modulates the host-microbiome response.
But that doesn’t mean it needs to be treated, but more to learn.
@ABsteward Candida pneumonia is the Sasquatch of pulmonary infectious diseases.
I can't exclude that it exists somewhere, but I have yet to actually see it.
Nearly always contamination.
Candida spp. are often recovered from respiratory cultures and usually interpreted as colonization
🆕💥🟢Single-center retrospective cohort study in #OFID
Antifungal therapy was not associated with lower 30-day mortality in time-dependent analysis (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.80-1.95) or weighted analysis (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.64-1.75); 90-day analyses were also null. #IDXposts https://t.co/HARjwZBHE2
🆕💥💥🟢PROCALBAN RCT
In this single-centre trial in Bangladesh, procalcitonin-guided de-escalation reduced the duration of antibiotic therapy in adults with suspected bacterial sepsis
Median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of antibiotic therapy was 4.7 (2.8–8.0) days with procalcitonin-guided therapy compared to 9.0 (5.8–12.0) days in the control arm (p < 0.0001).
Thanks @Inox94 #idxposts @BradSpellberg
https://t.co/PqaIt0KQtA
In my opinion, this study shouldn’t even have been published in CID!
The authors are trying to convince us that pip tazo is worse than cefepime in pneumoniae using in vitro pk pd ELF etc while essentially ignoring all clinical data exactly what IDSA are doing in it's AMR guidance!
C'mon ...200 patients?
This study doesn’t prove what the authors are claiming.! @DrToddLee@BradSpellberg #idxposts
It's a small study ( n: 204) but published in CID!
In the same direction that anaerobic antibiotics causes higher mortality
The debate continues!
🆕💥🟢 Single-center retrospective cohort study
Cefepime vs piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia
All-cause mortality occurred more frequently in patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam (23.1%) compared with those receiving cefepime (11.5%; p = 0.04, OW odds ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.05–5.42). No statistically significant differences in DOOR, clinical success, or resistance were observed #idxposts @DrToddLee https://t.co/PKMKKqqhZc
It's just one assumption, they are other reasons but I don't believe a single center 200 patients study just because it's published in CID proves cefepime is better than pip tazo in pseudo pneumoniae
All the reasons they mentioned including the one you add here are in vitro assumptions that may or may not translate into clinical outcomes
Can't wait @DrToddLee upcoming data
It's a small study ( n: 204) but published in CID!
In the same direction that anaerobic antibiotics causes higher mortality
The debate continues!
🆕💥🟢 Single-center retrospective cohort study
Cefepime vs piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia
All-cause mortality occurred more frequently in patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam (23.1%) compared with those receiving cefepime (11.5%; p = 0.04, OW odds ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.05–5.42). No statistically significant differences in DOOR, clinical success, or resistance were observed #idxposts @DrToddLee https://t.co/PKMKKqqhZc
@ABsteward Look. It's just not possible this is real at odds ratio 2 when acorn trial exists (plus the other pip tazo vs cefepime trials)
I don't understand why journals will publish these sensational things which are impossible when compared to the actual randomized data
@gushamilton
@ABsteward Yes!!!! I don't know why our cefepime SR/MA isn't out yet --- but there are thousands of randomized patients comparing pip tazo to cefepime and guess which drug looks worse for mortality?
@ABsteward@DrToddLee Literature on thymidine or related metabolic changes in S. aureus during TMP-SMX Tx goes back to the 1970s. It's a little mixed, and clearly a complicated story. But may be a real phenomenon in high density bloodstream infections. One more recent paper: https://t.co/gHwy6Ct8kZ