@mixed_recycling@KUHoopes Bud, he said he had a PhD, which makes his position more valid. He still hasn’t explained how everything he believes is fully possible and did happen, but the flood just straight up didn’t because a book he doesn’t agree with said it did.
@BriskittyBackup@Outlander3k@KUHoopes For wanting a logical explanation that this guy believes humans made it all the way through their initial creation but didn’t survive a flood because Bible says so and not a modern century “science” text?
@ACarro747@Outlander3k “This is where you use your PhD to explain in detail how this is possible.”
It is not on me to explain this to you.
Use Google. Use ChatGPT. Read blogs. Read books. Educate yourself.
That’s your own responsibility.
Okay. Let’s go with your timeline, along with the big bang, abiogenesis, and evolution into humans. You still haven’t explained how ALL of that is plausible, and confirmed now according to you, BUT, it’s impossible that a flood killed a massive portion of the existing population, and humanity continued on from there. This is where you use your PhD to explain the plausibility of these things, like I originally stated.
@KUHoopes “You need to understand my unconfirmed timeline of what I believe humanity and its origins are, but you also can’t believe that those same humans survived a massive flood.” Wow, you’re one of the worst humans I’ve ever had the displeasure of conversing with in a long time.
You literally could not be proving my point any better. You’re supposed to be explaining how all of what you believe is MORE plausible, and the flood not even happening, makes sense. Big bang>abiogenesis>evolution to Homo sapiens. All possible. Those same Homo sapiens surviving a flood later on? Impossible, didn’t happen. This is where you use your PhD to explain in detail how this is possible.